Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stakeholders in the EIA Process: What is Important for them? The Case of Road Construction Cover

Stakeholders in the EIA Process: What is Important for them? The Case of Road Construction

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (February 2018)
By: Renata Dagiliute and  Gintare Juozapaitiene  
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. [1] Morgan R. K. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2012:30:5-14. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Polonen I., Hokkanen P., Jalava K. The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system - What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2011:31:120-128. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Zhang J., Kornov L., Christensen P. Critical factors for EIA implementation: Literature review and research options. Journal of Environmental Management 2013:114:148-157. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Glucker A. N., Driessen P. P. J., Kolhoff A., Runhaar H. A. C. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2013:43:104-111. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Soria-Lara J. A., Bertolini L., te Brommelstroet M. Environmental impact assessment in urban transport planning: Exploring process-related barriers in Spanish practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2015:50:95-104. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Chanchitpricha C., Bond A. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2013:43:65-72. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Antonson H. Public participation and written submissions: A transport infrastructure planning case study. Transportation Research 2014:70:59-66. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.015
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] O’Faircheallaigh C. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010:30:19-27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Soria-Lara J. A., Bertolini L., te Brommelstroet M. An experiential approach to improving the integration of knowledge during EIA in transport planning. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2016:56:188-199. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Reed M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 2008:141:2417 -2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] UN. Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context. Espoo; 1991.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Kruopiene J., Zidoniene S., Dvarioniene J. Current practice and shortcomings of EIA in Lithuania. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2009:29:305-309. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Woloszyn W. Evolution of environmental impact assessment in Poland: problems and prospects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2004:22(2):109-119. doi:10.3152/147154604781765950
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of European Union 2014:124:1-18.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Savan B., Gore C. Translating strong principles into effective practice: environmental assessment in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2014:58(3):404-422. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.859572
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Toro J., Requena I., Zamorano M. Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010:30:247-261. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC, as amended by Directives 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC). European Commission; 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Cuppen M., Broekhans B., Enserink B. Public participation in EIA and attitude formation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2012:30(2):63-74. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660348
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Luyet V., Schlaepfer R., Parlange M., Buttler A. A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 2012:111:213-219. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Kruopiene J., Zidoniene S., Dvarioniene J., Mikalauskas A. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Lithuania. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 2008:2(44):28-33.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Infraplanas. The EIA report of Vilnius Siaurine Street. Kaunas; 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Law on Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Economic Activity. The Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania; 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Zhang Y., Liu X., Yu Y., Bian G., Li Y., Long Y. Challenge of Public Participation in China’s EIA Practice. 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Portugal, 27 May-1 June 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Kittipongvises S. Assessment of Environmental Impacts of Limestone Quarrying Operations in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20:67-83. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-0011
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Lera-Lopez F., Sanchez M., Faulin J., Cacciolatti L. Rural environment stakeholders and policy making: Willingness to pay to reduce road transportation pollution impact in the Western Pyrenees. Transportation Research 2014:32:129-142. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Chi C. S. F., Xu J., Xue L. Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2014:57(9):1422-1440. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.810550
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Hourdequin M., Landres P., Hanson M. J., Craig D. R. Ethical implications of democratic theory for U.S. public participation in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2012:35:37-44. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 82
Published on: Oct 18, 2018
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Environmental impact assessment,
Participation,
Road construction,
Socio-economic environment,
Stakeholders
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2018 Renata Dagiliute, Gintare Juozapaitiene, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (February 2018)Next article