Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve for the Baltic States Cover

Analysis of the Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve for the Baltic States

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 12 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)
By: Giedrė Lapinskienė,  Manuela Tvaronavičienė and  Pranas Vaitkus  
Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. 1. Adom P., Bekoe W., Amuakwa-Mensah F., Mensah J.T., Botchway E. 2012. Carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, industrial structure, and technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Ghana, Senegal, and Morocco on the causal dynamics Energy, Volume 47, Issue 1, 314-325. doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.02510.1016/j.energy.2012.09.025
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Akbostanci, E.; Turut-Asik, S.; Tunc, G.I. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?, 2009. Energy Policy 37: 861-867.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Ansuategi, A.; Escapa, M. Economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions, Ecological Economics, 2002, 40, p. 23-37.10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00272-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Baodong L., Xiaokun W. 2011. Economic Structure and Intensity Influence Air Pollution Model Original Energy Procedia, Volume 5, 803-807 doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.141.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Buehn A.; Farzanegan M. Hold your breath: a new index of air pollution. Energy economics. 2013.37 p. 104-113.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.01.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Cole, M. A.; Rayner, A. J.; Bates, J. M. 1997. The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis, Environment and Development Economics 2(4): 401-16.10.1017/S1355770X97000211
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Culas, R. REDD and forest transition: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve , Ecological Economics 2012.79:44-51.School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 883, Orange NSW 2800, Australia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.01510.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.015
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Dinda, S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey, Ecological Economics, 2004, 49, p. 431-455. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.01110.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Esteve, V.; Tamarit, C. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Spain? Fresh evidence from old data, 2012. Economic Modelling 29: 2696-2703.10.1016/j.econmod.2012.08.016
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. [online], [cited 17 September 2012]. Available from Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Eurostat statistical book. 2010 Using official statistics to calculate greenhouse gas emissions. A statistical guide. [online], [cited 10November 2012] Available from Internet: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-31-09-272/EN/KS-31-09-272-EN.PDF
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Eurostat. [online], [cited 17 September 2012].Available from internet: <http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/>
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Eviews 4 Users guide. 2000. Irvine CA: Quantitative Micro Software, LLC.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Fosten, J.; Morley B.; Taylor, T. 2012. Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom, Ecological Economics 76: 25-33. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.02310.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.023
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Galeotti, M.; Lanza, A.; Pauli, F. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise, Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(1), p. 152-163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Gassebner M, Lamla M.J, Sturm J. Determinants of pollution: what do we really know? Oxf. Econ. Pap., 2011, 63, p. 568 - 595. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpq02910.1093/oep/gpq029
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Grossman, G. M.; Krueger, A. B. 1991. Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. Working Paper 3194.Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. [online], [cited 10 July 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf.10.3386/w3914
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Grossman, G. M.; Krueger, A. B. 1995. Economic growth and the environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:353-377. [online], [cited 15 July 2012]. Available from Internet: https://groups.nceas.ucsb.edu/sustainability-science/weeklysessions/ session-2-09.20.2010-sustainability-science-and-sustainabledevelopment/ supplemental-readings-from-umngroup/ Grossman1995.pdf/view10.2307/2118443
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Hamit-Haggar M. Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. 2012. Energy Economics 34:358-364.10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. He J.; Wang H. 2012. Economic struvture, development policy and environmental quality: An empirical analysis of environmental Kuznets curves with Chinese municipal data. Ecological Economics, Volume 76:49-59.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.014
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Holtz-Eakin, D.; Selden, T.M. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of public economics, 1995, 57, p. 85-101.10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Huang, W. M.; Lee, G. W. M.; Wu C. 2008. GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: A revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis, Energy Policy 36(1): 239-247. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.03510.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.035
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Kuznets, S. Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 1955, 4(1),p. 1-28. [online], [cited 1 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://web.undp.org/latinamerica/inequality/bibliography/ Economic%20Growth%20and%20Income%20Inequality.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Kyoto protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1997. [online], [cited 18 September 2012]. Available from Internet: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Lamla M.J., Long-run determinants of pollution: A robustness analysis, Ecological Economics, 2009., vol. 69, Issue 1, 15 November 9, p. 135-144, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.00210.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Lapinskienė G.; Tvaronavičienė M.; Vaitkus The emissions of greenhouse gases and economic growth - the evidence of the presence of the Environmental Kuznets curve in the European Union countries, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2013. Will be published.10.3846/20294913.2014.881434
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Lin, C.Y.; Liscow, Z. D.,. Endogeneity in the Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Instrumental Variables Approach, American J. of Agricultural Economics 2013. 95 (2): 268-274.10.1093/ajae/aas050
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Saboori, B.; Sulaiman’, J.; Mohd, S.. Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, 2012. Energy Policy 51:184-191.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Schmandt, J. 2010. George P. Mitchell and the Idea of Sustainability.Texas A&M University Press. 192 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Selden, T.M.; Song D. Environmental Quality and Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? Evironmental economics and management, 1994, 27 p. 147-16210.1006/jeem.1994.1031
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Stern, D. Rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 2004, 32(8), p. 1419-1439. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.00410.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Stern, D.; Ma, C. 2008. Biomass and China's carbon emissions: A missing piece of carbon decomposition, Energy Policy 36(7): 2517-2526. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.013.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. World Bank 1992. Development and the Environment. [online], [cited 8September 2012]. Available from Internet: http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&t heSitePK=469372&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=0 00178830_9810191106175
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. [online], [cited 16 September 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf>
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2013-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 46
Published on: Feb 14, 2014
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
greenhouse gases,
Environmental Kuznets Curve,
Baltic States,
climate change
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Giedrė Lapinskienė, Manuela Tvaronavičienė, Pranas Vaitkus, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 12 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)Next article