Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Co-governance, Social Responsibility and Economic Democracy Cover

Co-governance, Social Responsibility and Economic Democracy

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2022

Abstract

This article contributes to the justification of social responsibility and economic democracy, which can create a sustainable society through co-governancein companies. Each of these areas is specifically described as well as the contribution of each to a sustainable society. Importantly, the message that capital, which predominates in the current socio-economic system, does not allow the development of co-governance of stakeholders in companies. This severely curtails the making of socially responsible decisions in companies, which does not contribute to the development of economic democracy. By equating the rights of labour owners with the rights of capital, the conditions of co-governance of stakeholders would be met, which would give them the right to self-actualization based on the results of their work. This would lead to the development of economic democracy and further to a sustainable society. A sustainable society, supported by the co-governance, social responsibility and economic democracy is the ultimate goal of society.

The word co-governance is not the same as co-management, although it is also very often used in translations that do not distinguish between management and governance. Rozman explains: “Owners-shareholders have started to employ professionals called managers to manage their companies. The once unified function of governance (and management) has been divided into two organizational functions: governance, making decisions to protect owners’ interests, and management, coordinating business activities in a most efficient way while striving to attain goals and execute policies set by governance.” (, 95) Later he explains: “The goal remained profitability, and corporate governance was conducted on the basis of ownership but not necessarily by the owners themselves. This was the first form of ‘non-owners’ or ‘nonself-governance’. Corporate governance and management went separate.” (, 4) Rozman 2000 Rozman 2013

Clarke (1998, 182–194 as cited in, 6) recalls of different stakeholders’ governance similar processes in the past, like mutual funds, cooperatives, Mondragon cooperatives, Israeli kibbutzes and Yugoslav self-governance. Rozman 2013

Language: English
Page range: 140 - 149
Published online: Jan 31, 2022
Published in print: Dec 30, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Peter Zdravje, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.