The problematic of budget implementation in Nigeria: A study of Delta State Government

Kelly Bryan Ovie Ejumudo; Tobi Becky Ejumudo

doi:10.2478/rsc-2020-0003

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

The problematic of budget implementation in Nigeria: A study of Delta State Government

Research in Social Change

Volume 12 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)

By: Kelly Bryan Ovie Ejumudo and Tobi Becky Ejumudo

Open Access

|Jul 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Mean rating showing the extent to which politics of accommodation has affected budget implementation

S/N	A	SA	D	SD	X
1	192	170	54	200	1.79
2	154	358	195	96	2.33
3	179	154	207	80	1.79
4	179	172	75	220	1.87
5	179	154	222	60	1.78
Grand mean					1.91

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 Criterion Mean= 2.5

Table 2

Chi-square analysis of questionnaire for the relationship between politics of accommodation and budget implementation

Items	SA/A	SD/D	Total	Df	X²-cal.	X²-cri.	Decision
1	80	20	345	3	161.19	7.82	Ho₁ is Rejected
2	74	26	345
3	74	26	345
4	76	24	345
5	74	26	345

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 P>0.05

Table 3

Mean rating showing the extent to which poor commitment has affected budget implementation

S/N	A	SA	D	SD	X
1	150	240	180	60	1.83
2	160	280	180	60	1.97
3	150	300	90	60	1.74
4	130	280	180	60	1.88
5	100	300	210	100	2.06
Grand mean					1.89

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 Criterion Mean= 2.5

Table 5

Chi-square analysis of questionnaire for the relationship between poor commitment and budget implementation

Items	SA/A	SD/D	Total	Df	X²-cal.	X²-cri.	Decision
1	78	22	345	3	145.99	7.82	Ho₂ is Rejected
2	87	13	345
3	87	13	345
4	78	22	345
5	72	28	345

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 P>0.05

Table 6

Mean rating of the response of sampled staff on the relationship between compromised budget monitoring and budget implementation

S/N	A	SA	D	SD	X
1	100	240	240	180	2.20
2	130	300	150	60	1.86
3	110	200	210	260	2.26
4	90	280	150	260	2.26
5	120	230	240	120	2.06
Grand mean					2.13

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 Criterion Mean= 2.5

Table 7

Chi-square analysis of questionnaire for the relationship between compromised budget monitoring and budget implementation

Items	SA/A	SD/D	Total	Df	X²-cal.	X²-cri.	Decision
1	63	37	345	3	62.95	7.82	Ho₃ is Rejected
2	81	19	345
3	61	39	345
4	67	33	345
5	68	32	345

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 P>0.05

Table 8

Mean rating of the response of sampled staff on the relationship between culture of corruption and budget implementation

S/N	SA	D	SD	X
1	230	195	280	2.32
2	200	252	144	2.09
3	260	225	140	2.12
4	190	210	260	2.25
Grand mean				2.22

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 Criterion Mean= 2.5

Table 9

Chi-square analysis of questionnaire for the relationship between culture of corruption and budget implementation

Items	SA/A	SD/D	Total	Df	X²-cal.	X²-cri.	Decision
1	61	39	345	3	216.42	7.82	Ho₄ Rejected
2	65	35	345
3	68	32	345
4	60	40	345
5	65	35	345

[i] Source: Field Work 2018 P>0.05

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rsc-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2463-8226

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 38 - 56

Published on: Jul 21, 2021

Published by: Sciendo

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

problematic,

budget,

implementation,

Nigeria and Delta State

Related subjects:

Culture,

© 2021 Kelly Bryan Ovie Ejumudo, Tobi Becky Ejumudo, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 12 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)