Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in combination with computed tomography angiography for coronary slow flow Cover

Diagnostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in combination with computed tomography angiography for coronary slow flow

By: Xin Ge,  Ding Zhou,  Yanmin Zhou,  Jiahe Sun and  Rui Jing  
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Javadi DH, Sotudeh DS, Javadi DA, Rezaee DM, Hajikarimi DM. Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow Syndrome: A Comparative Study. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022;47(9):100925. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100925
  2. Carvalho FP, Azevedo CF. Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon - Adding Myocardial Fibrosis to the Equation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020;114(3):552-3. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20200187
  3. Türkoğlu C, Şeker T, Genç Ö, Yıldırım A, Topuz M. The Relationship Between H2FPEF Score and Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2022;50(4):242-9. DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2022.21291
  4. Martínez Pereyra V, Seitz A, Hubert A, Mahrholdt H, Bekeredjian R, Sechtem U, et al. Coronary Microvascular Spasm as the Underlying Cause of the Angiographic Slow Flow Phenomenon. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(1):35-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.059
  5. Wu J, Meng S, Wang H, Huang R, Yang Y. Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow by the Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. Curr Med Imaging. 2022;18(12):1302-10. DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220509121 758
  6. Sharma YP, Batta A, Makkar K, Hatwal J, A Gawalkar A, Kaur N, et al. Angiographic profile and outcomes in persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A study from tertiary care center in North India. Indian Heart J. 2022;74(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.12.010
  7. McMahon SR, Patel EK, Duvall WL. Stress-First Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Cardiol Clin. 2023;41(2):163-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2023.01.005
  8. Mann A, Williams J. Considerations for Stress Testing Performed in Conjunction with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2020;48(2):114-21. DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.245308
  9. Bengs S, Warnock GI, Portmann A, Mikail N, Rossi A, Ahmed H, et al. Rest/stress myocardial perfusion imaging by positron emission tomography with 18F-Flurpiridaz: A feasibility study in mice. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30(1):62-73. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-02968-9
  10. Camoni L, Dondi F. Time-efficient cardiac imaging: early post-injection stress-first protocol myocardial perfusion SPECT with a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30(6):2655-7. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03369-2
  11. De Bruyne B, Muller O. Computed tomography coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, and (S)low flow. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):644-5. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcin.2012.03.015
  12. Özde C, Aktüre G, Aytekin S, Sayin AE, Ay EK, Coçkun G, et al. Assessment of the relationship between coronary flow rates and myocardial perfusion abnormality in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: an observational study in cardiac syndrome X and coronary slow flow. Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(11):1122-9. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001080
  13. Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, et al. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(7):713-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019
  14. Sharedalal P, Gerard P, Jain D. Pharmacological stress myocardial perfusion imaging after an inadequate exercise stress test. J Nucl Cardiol 2022;29(4):1796-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02661-3
  15. Oruc V, Hage FG. Low-dose stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27(2):558-61. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1455-9
  16. Ipek G, Kamber T, Yilmaz H, Bolca O. Long-Term Change in Flow Rates in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow. Cardiology. 2023;148(6):500-5. DOI: 10.1159/000533802
  17. Rozanski A, Berman DS, Iskandrian AE. The imperative to assess physical function among all patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022;29(3):946-51. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02378-9
  18. Tong J, Bei GG, Zhang LB, Sun Y, Qi M, Yang BQ. Relationship between quantitative epicardial adipose tissue based on coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary slow flow. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):500. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03541-z
  19. Ogasawara S, Mukawa H, Sone T, Tsuboi H, Morishima I, Uesugi M, et al. Presence of myocardial hypoenhancement on multidetector computed tomography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction predicts poor prognosis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:101-7. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijcard.2015.01.085
  20. Li DL, Kronenberg MW. Myocardial Perfusion and Viability Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease: Clinical Value in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Guidance. Am J Med. 2021;134(8):968-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.03.011
  21. Lipkin I, Telluri A, Kim Y, Sidahmed A, Krepp JM, Choi BG, et al. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;219(3):407-19. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.27289
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2024-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2284-5623 | Journal ISSN: 1841-6624
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 148
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2024
Published on: May 2, 2024
Published by: Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Xin Ge, Ding Zhou, Yanmin Zhou, Jiahe Sun, Rui Jing, published by Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.