References
- 1. Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149856 DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0149856
- 2.Jensen AL, Kjelgaard-Hansen M. Method comparison in the clinical laboratory. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006 Sep;35(3):276-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2006. tb00131.x
- 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved guideline - Third Edition. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013. CLSI Document EP09-A3.
- 4. Statland BE. Clinical Decision Levels for Laboratory Tests, Second Edition. Oradell NJ, Medical Economics Books, 1987.
- 5. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs: laboratory requirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final Rule. Fed Regist 2003;16:3650-714.
- 6. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:491-500 DOI: 10.1080/0036551995018522910.1080/0036551995018522910667686
- 7. White GH, Farrance I; AACB Uncertainty of Measurement Working Group. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(4):S1-S24.
- 8. Smolcic VS, Bilic-Zulle L. Normalized MEDx chart as a useful tool for evaluation of analytical quality achievements. A picture is worth a thousand words. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(5):e99-e101. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-062910.1515/cclm-2012-062923241594
- 9. Sikaris K. Analytical quality - what should we be aiming for?. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(Suppl 1):S5-S10.
- 10. Westgard S, Bayat H, Westgard JO. Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28(2):020502. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2018.02050210.11613/BM.2018.020502603916130022879
- 11. Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, Nordin G, Sandberg S, Streichert T, et al. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Feb;55(2):189-194. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-009110.1515/cclm-2016-009127506603
- 12. Friedecky B, Kratochvila J, Budina M. Why do different EQA schemes have apparently different limits of acceptability? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Apr;49(4):743-5. DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.10510.1515/CCLM.2011.10521235390
- 13. Hens K, Berth M, Armbruster D, Westgard S. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):973-80. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-109010.1515/cclm-2013-109024615486
- 14. Fasano T, Bedini JL, Fle PA, Jlaiel M, Hubbert K, Datta H, et al. Multi-site performance evaluation and Sigma metrics of 20 assays on the Atellica chemistry and immunoassay analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Dec;58(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-069910.1515/cclm-2019-069931639101
- 15. Skendzel LP, Barnett RN, Platt R. Medically useful criteria for analytic performance of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Feb;83(2):200-5. DOI: 10.1093/ ajcp/83.2.20010.1093/ajcp/83.2.2003969959
- 16. Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 May;53(6):833-5. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-006710.1515/cclm-2015-006725719329