References
- 1. www.ASRO.ro (Asociatia de Standardizare din Romania) Standard SR EN ISO 15189:2013. 2013:37.
- 2. Statland BE. Medical decision level. Westgard QC Inc. Basic QC Practices, 4th Edition. Madison WI. 2016:112-6.
- 3. Westgard JO. Complying with CLIA QC Regulations. Westgard QC Inc. Basic QC Practices, 4th Edition, Madison WI. 2016:171-88.
- 4. Westgard JO. Analytical Performance Capability. West-gard QC Inc. Six Sigma Quality Design and Control, 2nd Editiond, Madison WI. 2016:45.
- 5. CLSI. User Verification of Precision and estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline-Third Edition CLSI document EP15-A3.Wayne, PA:Clinical and laboraty Standards Institute;2014.
- 6. Bull BS, Elashoff RM, Heilbron DC, Couperus J,A. Study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erytrocite indices. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974;61(4):473-81. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/61.4.47310.1093/ajcp/61.4.4734816793
- 7. Parvin CA. Assesing the impact of the frequency of quality control testing on the quality of reported patient results. Clin Chem. 2008;4(12):2049-54. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.11363910.1373/clinchem.2008.11363918927244
- 8. Yago M. Selecting Statistical Quality Control Procedures for Limiting the Impact of Increases in Analytical Random Error on Patient Safety. Clin Chem. 2017;63(5):1022-30. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.26768210.1373/clinchem.2016.26768228302731
- 9. Cembrowski GS, Westgard JO. Quality control of multichannel hematology analyzers: evaluation of Bull’s algorithm. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83(3):337-45. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/83.3.33710.1093/ajcp/83.3.3373976570
- 10. Westgard JO, Smith FA, Mountain PJ, Boss S. Design and assessment of average of normals patient data algorithms to maximize run lenghts for automatic process control. Clin Chem 1996;42(10):1683-88. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/42.10.168310.1093/clinchem/42.10.1683
- 11. van Rossum H. Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(6):773-82. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-079510.1515/cclm-2018-079530307894
- 12. Vis JY, Huisman A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol. 2016;38 (suppl 1):100-9. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.1250310.1111/ijlh.1250327161194
- 13. Lewis SM. Quality control: good laboratory practice - an overview of quality assurance. WHO/LAB/98.4 Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/ (last access 09/04/2019)
- 14. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory:types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2017; 53(7):1338-42. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.08834410.1373/clinchem.2007.08834417525103
- 15. Binzari E, Zaharia M, Barbu S, Oprea OR, Dobreanu M Hemolysis has no influence on routine coagulation tests without anticoagulant therapy-a referral Romanian emergency hospital laboratory experience. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2019; 27 (4):375-82. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2019-003410.2478/rrlm-2019-0034
- 16. Hawkins RC. Laboratory Turnaround Time. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007;28(4):179-94.