Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors Cover

The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors

Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. 1. Kaur G, Kaur P. Syphilis testing in blood donors: an update. Blood Transfusion. 2015;13(2):197. (PMID: 25545876).
  2. 2. Organization WH. Screening donated blood for transfusion-transmissible infections: recommendations: World Health Organization; 2010.http://www.who.int/blood-safety/ScreeningTTI.pdf
  3. 3. Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. Point-Counterpoint: It is time to use treponemal-specific antibody screening tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011:JCM. 06347-11. (PMID: 22090405).
  4. 4. Sommese L, De Pascale MR, Capuano M, Napoli C. Efforts in blood safety: Integrated approach for serological diagnosis of syphilis. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016;10(1):22. (PMID: 27011666). DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.16426710.4103/0973-6247.164267478248827011666
  5. 5. Binder SR, Theel ES. Syphilis testing algorithms: A review. World Journal of Immunology. 2016;6(1):1-8. DOI: 10.5411/wji.v6.i1.110.5411/wji.v6.i1.1
  6. 6. Karaca Y, Çöplü N, Gözalan A, Öncül Ö, Akin L, Esen B. Sifiliz Tanısında Kullanılan Serolojik Testler İçin Akış Şemasının Oluşturulması. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2010;44:35-45. (PMID: 20455397).
  7. 7. Li L, Cai B, Tao C, Wang L. Performance evaluation of CLIA for Treponema pallidum specific antibodies detection in comparison with ELISA. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016;30(3):216-22. (PMID: 25716172). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2183910.1002/jcla.21839680708225716172
  8. 8. Wang X, Chen L, Yu Q, Sun A. Evaluation of specific antibodies of blood receiver sera to Treponema pall-idum by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Zhonghua shi yan he lin chuang bing du xue za zhi= Zhonghua shiyan he linchuang bingduxue zazhi= Chinese journal of experimental and clinical virology. 2013;27(1):70-2. (PMID: 23855137).
  9. 9. Marangoni A, Moroni A, Accardo S, Cevenini R. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(1):1-6. (PMID: 19140205). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2026810.1002/jcla.20268664904919140205
  10. 10. Ortiz DA, Loeffelholz MJ. Evaluation of the Lumi-pulse® G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test. J Clin Microbiol. 2017:JCM. 00966-17. (PMID: 28878003).
  11. 11. Liu L, Xie Y, Dai Z, Zhuo C, Wu Y. Establishment and Evaluation of a One-Step Microplate Chemiluminescence Immunoassay to Detect IgG Antibody Against Treponema Pallidum. J Clin Lab Anal. 2015;29(6):493-7. (PMID: 25277551). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2179910.1002/jcla.21799680718925277551
  12. 12. Tiwari AK, Acharya DP, Dara RC, Arora D, Aggarwal G, Rawat GS. Evaluation of nonspecific treponemal test rapid plasma reagin in comparison with specific treponemal test immunochromatographic assay for screening healthy blood donors. Global J Transfusion Med. 2017;2(1):29. DOI: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_46_1610.4103/GJTM.GJTM_46_16
  13. 13. Naidu NK, Bharucha Z, Sonawane V, Ahmed I. Comparative study of Treponemal and non-Treponemal test for screening of blood donated at a blood center. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012;6(1):32. (PMID: 22623840). DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.9504810.4103/0973-6247.95048335362722623840
  14. 14. Wang LN, Li JM. Evaluation of immunoglobulin M and G Western blot and ELISA for screening antibodies to Treponema pallidum in blood donors. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(7):413-6. (PMID: 19387420). DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31819db59410.1097/OLQ.0b013e31819db59419387420
  15. 15. Baião A, Kupek E, Petry A. Reverse algorithm for syphilis screening more than halved false positive test results in Brazilian blood donors. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):64-6. (PMID: 24329733). DOI: 10.1111/tme.1209510.1111/tme.1209524329733
  16. 16. Sandes V, Silva S, Motta I, Velarde L, de Castilho S. Evaluation of positive and false-positive results in syphilis screening of blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Transfus Med. 2017;27(3):200-6. (PMID: 28230309). DOI: 10.1111/tme.1239510.1111/tme.1239528230309
  17. 17. Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic Testing for Syphilis: Benefits and Challenges of a Reverse Algorithm. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2014;36(24):195. (PMID: 28845073). DOI: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2014.12.00110.1016/j.clinmicnews.2014.12.001556856928845073
  18. 18. Binnicker M. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(1):79. (PMID: 22156894). DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e-32834e9a3c10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834e9a3c
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2019-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2284-5623 | Journal ISSN: 1841-6624
Language: English
Page range: 383 - 388
Submitted on: Apr 11, 2019
|
Accepted on: Sep 30, 2019
|
Published on: Nov 4, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Rukiye Berkem, Ayşe Esra Karakoç, published by Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.