Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Suggestions and Recommendations on Statistical Analysis and Research Methodology Cover

Suggestions and Recommendations on Statistical Analysis and Research Methodology

Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. 1. Adrian Man, Cosmin Moldovan, Minodora Dobreanu, Major editorial changes of Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2013;21(4):377-80. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2013 0047
  2. 2. Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine/Versita [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 10]. Available from: http:// versita.com/serial/romanian-review-of-laboratory- medicine/
  3. 3. Revista română de medicină de laborator [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 1]. Available from: http://rrml.ro/instructiuni_ autori.php
  4. 4. license_to_publish.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 23]. Available from: http://rrml.ro/instr_autori/license_ to_publish.pdf
  5. 5. Dienes Z. Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: which side are you on? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:274-290. DOI: 10.1177/174569161140692010.1177/174569161140692026168518
  6. 6. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. DOI: 10.1177/095679761141763210.1177/095679761141763222006061
  7. 7. Straus S, Richardson S, Glasziou P, Haynes B. Evidence based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd Edition, Elsevier 2005, p.115.
  8. 8. http://www.consort-statement.org
  9. 9. http://www.stard-statement.org
  10. 10. http://www.strobe-statement.org
  11. 11. http://www.medicine.uottawa.ca
  12. 12. http://www.prisma-statement.org
  13. 13. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100041210.1371/journal.pbio.1000412289395120613859
  14. 14. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.002012410.1371/journal.pmed.0020124118232716060722
  15. 15. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, Bradley EW et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature1155610.1038/nature11556351184523060188
  16. 16. Sena E, van der Worp HB, Howells D, Macleod M. How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:433-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.00910.1016/j.tins.2007.06.00917765332
  17. 17. Festing MF, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR J. 2002;43(4):244-58. DOI: 10.1093/ ilar.43.4.24410.1093/ilar.43.4.24412391400
  18. 18. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 1988.
  19. 19. Nakagawa S, Foster TM. The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethologica. 2004;7(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10211-004-0095z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2014-0046 | Journal eISSN: 2284-5623 | Journal ISSN: 1841-6624
Language: English
Page range: 413 - 418
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 Septimiu Voidăzan, Cosmin Moldovan, Minodora Dobreanu, published by Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.