Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimisation of the quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell infiltrates in breast cancer /Optimizarea analizei cantitative a infiltratului celular inflamator în cancerul mamar Cover

Optimisation of the quantitative analysis of inflammatory cell infiltrates in breast cancer /Optimizarea analizei cantitative a infiltratului celular inflamator în cancerul mamar

Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator
Volume 22 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
By: Anca-Raluca Vrânceanu,  Cristina Claudia Tărniceriu,  Daniela Jitaru,  Cristina Terinte,  Florin Zugun-Eloae and  Eugen Carasevici  
Open Access
|Oct 2014

References

  1. 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. DOI: 10.3322/caac.2007310.3322/caac.2007320610543
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. DeNardo DG, Andreu P, Coussens LM. Interactions between lymphocytes and myeloid cells regulate pro- versus anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010 Jun;29(2):309-16. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-010-9223-610.1007/s10555-010-9223-6286563520405169
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Apr;120(2):293-308. DOI: 10.1007/ s10549-010-0746-x10.1007/s10549-010-0746-x20107892
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Jochems C, Schlom J. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognosis: the potential link between conventional cancer therapy and immunity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2011 May;236(5):567-79. DOI: 10.1258/ ebm.2011.01100710.1258/ebm.2011.011007322926121486861
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Fridman WH, Pagès F, Sautès-Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar;12(4):298-306. DOI: 10.1038/nrc324510.1038/nrc324522419253
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Gerner MY, Kastenmuller W, Ifrim I, Kabat J, Germain RN. Histo-cytometry: a method for highly multiplex quantitative tissue imaging analysis applied to dendritic cell subset microanatomy in lymph nodes. Immunity. 2012 Aug;37(2):364-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni. 2012.07.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Ascierto PA, Capone M, Urba WJ, Bifulco CB, Botti G, Lugli A, et al. The additional facet of immunoscore: immunoprofiling as a possible predictive tool for cancer treatment. J Transl Med. 2013 Mar;11:54. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-5410.1186/1479-5876-11-54360822523452415
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Galon J, Pages F, Marincola FM, Thurin M, Trinchieri G, Fox BA, et al. The immune scor as a new possible approach for the classification of cancer. J Transl Med 2012 Jan;10:1. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-110.1186/1479-5876-10-1326936822214470
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Al-Kofahi Y, Lassoued W, Grama K, Nath SK, Zhu J, Oueslati R, et al. Cell-based quantification of molecular biomarkers in histopathology specimens. Histopathology 2011 Jul;59(1):40-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03878.x10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03878.x314209521771025
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Eiró N, Pidal I, Fernandez-Garcia B, Junquera S, Lamelas ML, del Casar JM, et al. Impact of CD68/ (CD3+CD20) ratio at the invasive front of primary tumors on distant metastasis development in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e52796. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.005279610.1371/journal.pone.0052796353050823300781
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Chang H, Yang Q, Parvin B. Segmentation of heterogeneous blob objects through voting and level set for mulation. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2007;28(13):1781-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.05.00810.1016/j.patrec.2007.05.008274732519774202
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Lin G, Chawla MK, Olson K, Guzowski JF, Barnes CA, Roysam B. Hierarchical, model-based merging of multiple fragments for improved three-dimensional segmentation of nuclei. Cytometry A. 2005;63(1):20-33. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.2009910.1002/cyto.a.20099
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. De Solorzano CO, Malladi R, Lelievre SA, Lockett SJ. Segmentation of nuclei and cells using membrane related protein markers. J Microsc. 2001 Mar;201(Pt 3):404-1. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00854.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00854.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Ancin H, Roysam B, Dufresne TE, Chestnut MM, Ridder GM, Szarowski DH, et al. Advances in automated 3-D image analyses of cell populations imaged by confocal microscopy. Cytometry. 1996 Nov;25(3):221-34. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19961101)25:3<;221::AIDCYTO3> 3.3.CO;2-O DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19961101)25:3<;221::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19961101)25:3<;221::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-I
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Căruntu ID, Covic A. Renal corpuscle morphometry with increased reliability and high level of automation. Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203:9-20. DOI: 10.1016/j. prp.2006.06.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Galon J, Pagès F, Marincola FM, Thurin M, Trinchieri G, Fox BA, et al. The immune score as a new possible approach for the classification of cancer. J Transl Med. 2012 Jan;10:1. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-110.1186/1479-5876-10-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe DG, Macmillan RD, Grainge MJ, Lee AH, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May;29(15):1949-55. DOI: 10.1200/ JCO.2010.30.503710.1200/JCO.2010.30.5037
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Dutta S, Going JJ, Crumley AB, Mohammed Z, Orange C, Edwards J, et al. The relationship between tumour necrosis, tumour proliferation, local and systemic inflammation, microvessel density and survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb;106(4):702-10. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.61010.1038/bjc.2011.610
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Mahmoud SM, Lee AH, Paish EC, Macmillan RD, Ellis IO, Green AR. The prognostic significance of B lymphocytes in invasive carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(2):545-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1620-110.1007/s10549-011-1620-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Turbin DA, Leung S, Cheang MC, Kennecke HA, Montgomery KD, McKinney S, et al. Automated quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring: a tissue microarray study of 3,484 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Aug;110(3):417-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9736-z10.1007/s10549-007-9736-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Budczies J, Klauschen F, Sinn BV, Győrffy B, Schmitt WD, Darb-Esfahani S, et al. Cutoff Finder: a comprehensive and straightforward Web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51862. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0051862
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2014-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2284-5623 | Journal ISSN: 1841-6624
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 335 - 345
Submitted on: Apr 9, 2014
|
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2014
|
Published on: Oct 8, 2014
Published by: Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
the quantitative analysis,
cut-off,
inflammatory infiltrates,
breast cancer
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Biochemistry,
Human biology,
Microbiology and virology

© 2014 Anca-Raluca Vrânceanu, Cristina Claudia Tărniceriu, Daniela Jitaru, Cristina Terinte, Florin Zugun-Eloae, Eugen Carasevici, published by Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)Next article