Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of the Internal Structure Density in the Process of Fabrication of Orthodontic Master Models by Fused Deposition Modeling Cover

Impact of the Internal Structure Density in the Process of Fabrication of Orthodontic Master Models by Fused Deposition Modeling

Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology
Volume 30 (2022): Issue 50 (June 2022)
By: Jan Milde,  Dimitrios Papagiannopoulos and  Andrej Thurzo  
Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. [1] SOO-YEON, K., YOO-SEOK, S., HWI-DONG, J., CHUNG-JU, H., HYOUNG-SEON, B., JUNG-YUL, C. 2018. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Volume 153, Issue 1, 144-153. January 2018. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088954061730647910.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.02529287640
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] TANEVA, E., KUSNOTO, B., EVANS, C., A. 2015. 3D Scanning, Imaging, and Printing in Orthodontics. In: Issues in Contemporary Orthodontics. 147-181. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/issues-in-contemporary-orthodontics/3d-scanning-imaging-and-printing-in-orthodontics10.5772/60010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Raphael, R., et al. 2017. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 1-9. 10.1155/2017/8427595.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] CAMPBELL T., WILLIAMS C., IVANOVA O., GARRETT B. 2011. Generalized Additive Manufacturing Process. [online] Image. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257942754_Could_3D_Printing_Change_the_World_Technologies_Potential_and_Implications_of_Additive_Manufacturing
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] KONTA, A., GARCÍA, M., SERRANO, D. 2017. Personalised 3D Printed Medicines: Which Techniques and Polymers Are More Successful? Bioengineering, 4. 1-16. 10.3390/bioengineering404007910.3390/bioengineering4040079574674628952558
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] XYZPrinting. Tlačiareň Zortrax M200. Available at:https://xyzprint.eu/ihned-k-pouzitiu/612-3dtlaciaren-zortrax-m200-zortrax-.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] KEUN-YOUNG, L., JIN-WOO, C., NA-YOUNG, CH., JONG-MOON, CH., KYUNG-HWA, K., SANG-CHEOL, K., JIN-HYOUNG, C. 2015. Accuracy of three-dimensional printing for manufacturing replica teeth In: The Korean Association of Orthodontists, pp. 217-224 pISSN 2234-7518. eISSN 2005-372X http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.21710.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.217459386626445716
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] HEMANT, S. and ANJU, ANU J. 2018. 3D Printing in Dentistry - Sculpting the Way It Is. Journal of Scientific and Technical Research. Available at: http://www.publishingindia.com/jstr
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] British Standards Institute. Glossary of Dental Terms (BS4492). London: BSI, 1983.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] DOĞRAMACI, E. J., ROSSI-FEDELE, G., JONES, A.G. 2015. Multi - disciplinary management of a patient with a post-traumatised incisor presenting concurrent replacement and inflammatory resorption: a case report. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:216-225.10.21307/aoj-2020-158
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] RENKEMA, A. M., BRONKHORST, E., KUIJPERS –JAGTMAN, A. M. 2009. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in the Netherlands. Eur J Orthod, 2009;31:432-437.10.1093/ejo/cjn13119401355
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] VALIATHAN, M., HUGHES, E. 2010. Results of a survey - based study to identify common retention practices in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:170-177.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.02320152670
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Zendura. 2020. Clear aligner & retainer material. Online: https://www.zenduradental.com/products/125mm-round
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] SINGH, P., GRAMMATI, S., KIRSCHEN, R. 2009. Orthodontic retention patterns in the United Kingdom. J Orthod 2009;36:115-121.10.1179/1465312072304019487742
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] HICHENS L., ROWLAND H., WILLIAMS A. 2007. Cost -effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum -formed retainers. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:372-378.10.1093/ejo/cjm03917702797
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] PRATT, M.C., KLUEMPER, G. T., HARTSFIELD, J. K. JR., FARDO, D., NASH, D. A. 2011. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:520-52610.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.023516145721967939
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] RAWLS, H.R. 2013. Dental Polymers. In: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR, eds. Philips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th edn. St Louis: Elsevier; 2013:92-110.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] RYOKAWA H., MIYAZAKI Y., FUJISHIMA A., MIYAZAKI T., MAKI K. 2006. The mechanical properties of dental thermoplastic materials in a simulated intraoral environment. Orthod Waves 2006;65:64-72.10.1016/j.odw.2006.03.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] MILDE, J., & JURINA, F. 2019. Comparison of Selected Thermoplastic Materials in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process and their Influence on the Dimensional Accuracy of an Orthodontic Upper Teeth Model. Materials Science Forum, 952, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.952.14310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.952.143
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] MILDE, J., MOROVIČ, L. BLAHA. J. 2017. Influence of the layer thickness in the Fused Deposition Modeling process on the dimensional and shape accuracy of the upper teeth model. Modern Technologies in Manufacturing (MTeM 2017). 137. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713702006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Eagle plastic limited. What is High Impact Polystyrene?. Available at https://www.eagleplastics.co.uk/what-is-high-impact-polystyrene-used-for/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Omnexus.specialchem.com. 2020. Shrinkage Value of Plastics Material & Injection Molding Chart. [online] Available at:https://omnexus.specialchem.com/polymerproperties/properties/shrinkage
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2022-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1338-0532
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 20
Submitted on: Apr 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: May 30, 2022
|
Published on: Aug 23, 2022
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Master model,
FDM,
3D scanning,
vacuuming,
Essix,
comparison,
HIPS,
infill
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2022 Jan Milde, Dimitrios Papagiannopoulos, Andrej Thurzo, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 30 (2022): Issue 50 (June 2022)Next article