References
- [1] ASKARPOUR, M., MANDRIOLI, D., ROSSI, M., VINCENTINI, F. 2019. Formal model of human errorneous behavior for safety analyses in collaborative robotics. In Robotics and computer-integrated Manufacturing, 57, pp. 456-476, ISSN: 0736-584510.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.001
- [2] SCHOLTZ, J. 2002. Theory and Evaluation of Human Robot Interactions. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference in System Sciences. ISBN 978-0-7695-1874-9
- [3] SOUSA, S., LAMAS D., DIAS P. 2014. A Model for Human-Computer Trust. In Zaphiris P., Ioannou A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing and Developing Novel Learning Experiences. LCT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8523. Springer, Cham, Online ISBN 978-3-319-07482-5
- [4] KOVACS, G.; KOT, S. 2016. New Logistics and Production Trends as the Effect of Global Economy Changes. Pol. J. Manag. Stud., 14, pp.115–126.10.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.11
- [5] MASLARIĆ, M., NIKOLIČIĆ, S., MIRČETIĆ, D. 2016. Logistics Response to the Industry 4.0: the Physical Internet. Open Engineering, (1). Online ISSN 2391-543910.1515/eng-2016-0073
- [6] RICHERT, A., MÜLLER, S., SCHRÖDER, S., JESCHKE, S. 2018. Anthropomorphism in social robotics: empirical results on human–robot interaction in hybrid production workplaces. AI & Soc (2018) 33, p. 413–424. ISSN 0951-566610.1007/s00146-017-0756-x
- [7] FIDLEROVÁ H., PORUBČINOVÁ M., FERO M., NOVOTNÁ I. 2019. Identification of Challenges and Opportunities for Work 4.0 Competences Developing in Slovakia In Human Capital Formation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. IGI Global, pp. 44-72, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9810-7.ch003, ISBN: 152259810310.4018/978-1-5225-9810-7.ch003
- [8] YOU, S., ROBER, L. 2008. Emotional Attachment, Performance, and Viability in Teams Collaborating with Embodied Physical Action (EPA) Robots. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 377-407. ISSN 1536-932310.17705/1jais.00496
- [9] LEONHARD, G. 2016. Technology versus humanity Technology vs. Humanity: The coming clash between man and machine (FutureScapes). Kindle Edition, Fast Future Publishing, 186 p., ISBN10: 0993295827
- [10] SHERIDAN, T. B. 2016. Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(4), pp. 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872081664436410.1177/001872081664436427098262
- [11] PETERS, D., CALVO, R., A., RYAN, M. 2018. Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(797), pp. 1-15. ISSN 1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797598547029892246
- [12] GROOM, V., NASS, C. 2007. Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human-robot teams. Interaction Studies,8(3), pp. 483-500, ISSN 1572-037310.1075/is.8.3.10gro
- [13] BARAGLIA, J., CAKMAK, M., NAGAI, Y., RAO, R. P., & ASADA, M. 2017. Efficient human-robot collaboration: When should a robot take initiative? The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(5–7), pp. 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836491668825310.1177/0278364916688253
- [14] TURKLE, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Hardcover. ISBN-10: 0465031463
- [15] VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M.G., DAVIS G.D., DAVIS. F.D. 2003. User Acceptance of IT. Individual reactions to using information technology. Intentions to use. MIS Quarterly,27(3), 427. ISSN 2162-973010.2307/30036540
- [16] VENKATESH V., MORRIS. M.G. 2000. Age differences in technology adoption decisions. Implications for changing work force. In Personnel Psychology, 53, pp. 375-403. ISSN 1744-657010.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x
- [17] SCHULER, D., NAMIOKA, A. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Lawrence ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, INC. ISBN 10: 0805809511
- [18] MICHALOS, G., KOUSI, N., KARAGIANNIS, P.M GHOURNELOS, CH. 2018. SEAMLESS HUMAN robot collaboration assembly – An automotive case study. Mechatronics, Vol, 55, pp. 194-211. ISSN 0957-415810.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.08.006
- [19] SATO, H. KAMIDE, Y., M. KOJIMA, M., ARAI, T. 2018. Friendly Motion Learning towards Sustainable Human Robot Interaction. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, pp. 848-853. ISSN 2153-085810.1109/IROS.2018.8593432
- [20] FIORENTINO, M., UVA, A., GATTULLO, M., DEBERNARDIS, S., MONNO, G. 2014. Augmented reality on large screen for interactive maintenance instructions. Computers in Industry,65(2), pp. 270-278. ISSN 0166-361510.1016/j.compind.2013.11.004
- [21] KUCHENBRANDT, D., EYSSEL, F. 2012. The mental simulation of a human-robot interaction: Positive effects on attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Paris, pp. 463-468, doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343795.10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343795
- [22] GUDBROD, R., WIELE, CH. 2012. The Software Dilemma: Balancing Creativity and Control on the Path to Sustainable Software. Berlin: Springer, p. 281.10.1007/978-3-642-27236-3
- [23] AIZSTRAUTA D., GINTERS E. Introducing Integrated Acceptance and Sustainability Assessment of Technologies: a Model based on System Dynamics Simulation. Springer LNBIP 145 Series “Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, Economics and Management”, Springer LNBIP 145 Series “Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, Economics and Management”.
- [24] AIZSTRAUTA, D., CELMINA, A., GINTERS, E., & MAZZA, R. 2013. Validation of Integrated Acceptance and Sustainability Assessment Methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 26, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.12.00510.1016/j.procs.2013.12.005
- [25] VENKATESH, V., THONG, J., XUX. 2016. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems17(5), pp. 328–376.10.17705/1jais.00428