Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Virtual Commissioning of a Robotic Cell Prior to its Implementation Into a Real Flexible Production System. Cover

Virtual Commissioning of a Robotic Cell Prior to its Implementation Into a Real Flexible Production System.

Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology
Volume 26 (2018): Issue 42 (June 2018)
By: Roman Ružarovský,  Radovan Holubek and  Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino  
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. 1. SHAHIM, N., MØLLER, CH. 2016. Economic Justification of Virtual Commissioning in Automation Industry. Proc. of the 2016 Winter Sim. Conf., pp. 2430-244110.1109/WSC.2016.7822282
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. REINHART, G., WÜNSCH, G. 2007. Economic application of virtual commissioning to mechatronic. Prod. Eng. – Res. and Devel., 1(4), pp. 371–379.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. LIU, Z., DIETRICH, C., SUCHOLD, N. 2012. Virtual Commissioning of Automated Systems. INTECH Open Access Publisher.10.5772/45730
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. KIEFER, J., BORUTTA, H. 2010. Virtuelle Inbetriebnahme im Rohbau Werk Wörth. (Virtual Commissioning in the Wörth plant bodyshop) 6. Fachkongress Digitale Fabrik@Produktion. Fulda.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. HINCAPIÉ, M. et al. 2014. Mixing real and virtual components in automated manufacturing systems using PLM tools. Int.r. J. on Int.Des. and Man.(IJIDeM),8(3), pp. 209-230.10.1007/s12008-014-0206-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. REINHART, G., WÜNSCH, G. 2007. Economic application of virtual commissioning to mechatronic production systems. Production Engineering, 1(4), pp. 371-379.10.1007/s11740-007-0066-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. DAHL. M. et al. 2017. Automatic modelling and simulation of robot program behavior in integrated virtual preparation and commissioning. Proc. Manuf., 11, pp. 284-291.10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.107
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. LEE, C. G., PARK, S. C. 2014. Survey on the virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems, J. Comput. Des. Eng., 1(3), pp. 213–222.10.7315/JCDE.2014.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. DAMRATH, F., STRAHILOV, A., BÄR, T., VIELHABER, M. 2014. Establishing Energy Efficiency as Criterion for Virtual Commissioning of Automated Assembly Systems. Procedia CIRP, 23, 137-142.10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.082
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. DAHL, M. et al. 2016. Integrated Virtual Preparation and Commissioning: supporting formal methods during automation systems development. IFAC-PapersOnLine,49(12), pp. 1939-1944.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.914
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. DAHL, M. et al. 2017. Sequence Planner: Supporting Integrated Virtual Preparation and Commissioning. IFAC-PapersOnLine,50(1), pp. 5818-5823.10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.536
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. MAKRIS, S., MICHALOS, G., CHRYSSOLOURIS, G. 2012. Virtual Commissioning of an Assembly Cell with Cooperating Robots. Advances in Decision Sciences.10.1155/2012/428060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. DUMITRAȘCU, A., NAE, L., PREDINCEA, N. 2014. Virtual Commissioning as a Final Step in Digital Validation of the Robotic Manufacturing Systems. Proc. in Manuf. Sys., 9(4), pp. 215-220.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. HALMSJÖ, J., FÄLT, J. 2016. Emulation of a production cell. Developing a Virtual Commissioning model in a concurrent environment. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. VERMAAK, H.J., NIEMANN, J.A. 2015. Validating a reconfigurable assembly system utilizing virtual commissioning. Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein: Interim : Interdisciplinary Journal,14(1).10.1109/RoboMech.2015.7359532
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. DAMRATH, F., STRAHILOV, A., BÄR, T., VIELHABER, M. 2015. Experimental Validation of a Physics-based Simulation Approach for Pneumatic Components for Production Systems in the Automotive Industry. Procedia CIRP, 31, pp. 35-40.10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.078
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. RUŽAROVSKÝ, R., DELGADO SOBRINO, D.R., HOLUBEK, R., KOŠŤÁL, P. 2014. Automated in-process inspection method in the Flexible production system iCIM 3000. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 693. pp. 50-55.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.693.50
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. SÜSS, S. et al. 2016. Standardized Classification and Interfaces of complex Behaviour Models in Virtual Commissioning. Procedia CIRP,52, pp. 24-29.10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. KOREN, Y. et al. 1999. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 48(2), pp. 527-540.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63232-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. KO, M., AHN, E., PARK, S.C. 2013. A concurrent design methodology of a production system for virtual commissioning. Con. Eng.: Res. and App.,21(2), pp. 129–140.10.1177/1063293X13476070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. KO, M., PARK, S.C. 2014. Template-based modelling methodology of a virtual plant for virtual commissioning. Con. Eng.: Res. and App.,22(3), pp. 197–205.10.1177/1063293X14531423
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. HOFFMANN, P., MAKSOUD, T.M.A. 2010. Virtual Commissioning of Manufacturing Systems - A Review and New Approaches to Simplification. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation (ECMS 2010), pp. 175-181.10.7148/2010-0175-0181
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. HOLUBEK, R., DELGADO SOBRINO, D.R., KOŠŤÁL, P., RUŽAROVSKÝ, R., VELÍŠEK, K. 2017. Using Virtual Reality tools to support simulations of manufacturing instances in Process Simulate: The case of an iCIM 3000 system. MATEC Web of Conferences, 137.10.1051/matecconf/201713704004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. HOLUBEK, R., RUŽAROVSKÝ, R., DELGADO SOBRINO, D.R., KOŠŤÁL, P., ŠVORC, A., VELÍŠEK, K. 2017. Novel trends in the assembly process as the results of the human–industrial robot collaboration. MATEC Web of Conferences, 137.10.1051/matecconf/201713704005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2018-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1338-0532
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 101
Submitted on: May 30, 2018
|
Accepted on: Jun 28, 2018
|
Published on: Oct 4, 2018
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Virtual Commissioning,
Production System,
Robotics,
OLP,
PLC,
Process Simulate
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2018 Roman Ružarovský, Radovan Holubek, Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2018): Issue 42 (June 2018)Next article