Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Challenges of Measuring the Direct Effects of E-Business in SMEs Cover

Challenges of Measuring the Direct Effects of E-Business in SMEs

Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology
Volume 21 (2013): Issue Special-Issue (June 2013)
By: Igor Pihir  
Open Access
|Aug 2013

References

  1. 1. EC. Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. European Council, Lisbon, 23.-24. 3. 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. EC. eEurope - An Information Society for All. COM (1999/687), European Commission, Bruxelles, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. EC. i2010 - A European Information Society for growth and employment. COM (2005/229 Final), Bruxelles, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. EC. Europe 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. VLADA RH. Electronic business development strategy in the Republic of Croatia 2007-2010. Zagreb, Croatia, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Electronic Business - CWA on electronic invoicing. http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/Sectors/ISSS/CWAdownload/Pages/CWA%20eInvoicing.aspx, pristupano 30.03.2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. European e-Business Lab (EBL). http://www.euebl.org/ebl/, pristupano 23.5.2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Pan-European Public Procurement Online (PEPPOL). http://www.peppol.eu/, pristupano 23.5.2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. E-Business W@tch. ICT and e-Business for an Innovative and Sustainable Economy: 7th synthesis Report of the Sectoral e-Business Watch (2010). The European Commission 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Eurostat, Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices 2010. Eurostat 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. HARLAND, C.M. at all. 2007. Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands. Journal of Operational Management, 25:1234-1254.10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. ZHENG, J. at all. 2004. Small firms and e-business: cautiousness, contingency and costbenefit. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,10:27-39.10.1016/j.pursup.2003.11.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. COHEN, S., KALLIRROI, G. 2006. e-Commerce Investments from an SME perspective: Cost, Benefits and Processes. The Electronic Journal Information SystemsEvaluation, 9(2): 45-46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. PEACOCK, E., TANNIRU., M. 2005. Activity-based justification of IT investments. Information & Management, 42:415-424.10.1016/j.im.2003.12.015
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. VIDAS-BUBANJA, M., GRK, S., CVETKOVIĆ, N. 2010. Economic Aspects of Doing E-Business in Companies. Megatrend revija. 7(2): 21-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. PEREGO, A., SALGARO, A. 2010. Assessing the benefits of B2B trade cycle integration: a model in the home appliances industry. Benchmarking: An InternationalJournal, 17(4):616-631.10.1108/14635771011060611
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. VOUTILAINEN, V., PENTO, T. 2003. Electronic invoice processing as a tool for cost reduction. Frontiers of e-Business Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. VOLKER, H. 2008. Modeling Collaborative e-Business Processes in SME environments. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5(2):46-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. LESJAK, D., VEHOVAR, V. 2005. Factors affecting evaluation of e-business projects. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4): 409-428.10.1108/02635570510592334
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. MOGOLLON, M., RAISINGHANI, M. 2003. Measuring ROI in e-business: A practical approach. Information Systems Management. Spring.10.1201/1078/43204.20.2.20030301/41472.10
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. ILOIU, M., ILOIU, S. 2008. Economic analysis of e-business investment projects. Annals of the University of Petrosani: Economics, 8(1):267-272.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. GIAGLIS, G.M., MYLONOPOULOS, N.A., DOUKIDIS, G.I. 1999. The ISSUE methodology for quantifying benefits from information systems. Logistics InformationManagement, 12(1/2):50 - 62.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. COOPER, R., KAPLAN R, S. 1992. Activity-Based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage. Accounting Horizons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. KAPLAN, R.S., ANDERSON, S.R. 2007. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits. Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. STOUTHUYSEN, K at all. 2010. Time-driven activity-based costing for a libraryacquisition process: A case study in a Belgian University. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 34:83-91. 10.1080/14649055.2010.10766264
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. KOCH, B. E-Invoicing / E-Billing in Europe and abroad. Billentis, 2011. http://www.ukeag.org.uk/media/155/e-invoicing_europe_etc_bilentis_report2011.pdf, pristupano [30.03.2013.]
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Politecnico Di Milano. Joint collaboration: a powerful driver for Electronic Invoicing in Italy. Politecnico Di Milano School of Managment, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. MacGREGOR, R.C., VRAZALIC, L. 2006. The Effects of Small Business Clusters in Prioritising Barriers to E-commerce Adoption in Regional SMEs. Journal of NewBusiness Ideas and Trends, 4(1):24-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. CHAN, F.T.S., CHONG, A.Y.-L., ZHOU, L. 2012. An Empirical Investigation of Factors Affecting E-collaboration Diffusion in SMEs. International Journal ofProduction Economics, 138(2), 329-344.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. VOLKER, H. 2008. Modeling Collaborative e-Business Processes in SME environments. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5(2):46-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. LYU, J.-J., HUANG, Y.-C; Li, S-C. 2010. A Synthetic Assessment of E-business for SMEs' in Taiwan. Contemporary Management Research, 6(4):281-304.10.7903/cmr.1154
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. BRUMEC, J. at all. Istraživanje generičkog procesnog modela tvrtke, identifikacija priključnih točaka za elektroničko poslovanje te tehničke i funkcionalne specifikacije e-Modula za njihovu implementaciju. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin, 2009. Dostupno na http://edocument.foi.hr/dokumentacija/glavnidokument, pristupano [30.03.2013.]
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. BRUMEC, J. at all. Usluge istraživanja i razvoja razmjene e-Računa u elektroničkoj trgovini. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin, 2011. Dostupno na http://edocument.foi.hr/ , pristupano [30.03.2013.]
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2013-0023 | Journal eISSN: 1338-0532
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 137 - 144
Published on: Aug 8, 2013
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
e-business,
cost reduction,
effects measurement,
SME
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2013 Igor Pihir, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2013): Issue Special-Issue (June 2013)Next article