Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Review of current hallux valgus management options

Romanian Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
Volume 2 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. 1. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observations on hallux valgus. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 1951 Aug; 33(3):376-91.10.1302/0301-620X.33B3.37614861244
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Perera AM, Mason L, Stephens MM. The pathogenesis of hallux valgus. JBJS. 2011 Sep 7; 93(17):1650-61.10.2106/JBJS.H.0163021915581
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Snijders CJ, Snijder JG, Philippens MM. Biomechanics of hallux valgus and spread foot. Foot & ankle. 1986 Aug; 7(1):26-39.10.1177/1071100786007001063744202
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Nguyen US, Hillstrom HJ, Li W, Dufour AB, Kiel DP, Procter-Gray E, Gagnon MM, Hannan MT. Factors associated with hallux valgus in a population-based study of older women and men: the MOBILIZE Boston Study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2010 Jan 1; 18(1):41-6.10.1016/j.joca.2009.07.008281820419747997
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Durman DC. Metatarsus primus varus and hallux valgus. AMA Archives of Surgery. 1957 Jan 1; 74(1):128-35.10.1001/archsurg.1957.0128007013201613381307
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Doty JF, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus and hypermobility of the first ray: facts and fiction. International orthopaedics. 2013 Sep 1; 37(9):1655-60.10.1007/s00264-013-1977-3376430623892517
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot & Ankle International. 2007 Jul; 28(7):759-77.10.3113/FAI.2007.075917666168
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot & Ankle International. 2007 May; 28(5):654-9.10.3113/FAI.2007.065417559782
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Roukis TS, Landsman AS. Hypermobility of the first ray: a critical review of the literature. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2003 Nov 1; 42(6):377-90.10.1053/j.jfas.2003.09.01014688782
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Klaue K, Hansen ST, Masquelet AC. Clinical, quantitative assessment of first tarsometatarsal mobility in the sagittal plane and its relation to hallux valgus deformity. Foot & Ankle International. 1994 Jan; 15(1):9-13.10.1177/1071100794015001037981800
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot & Ankle International. 2002 Jan; 23(1):68-74.10.1177/10711007020230011411822697
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus. In Mann RA, Coughlin MJ (eds). Surgery of the foot and ankle, 7th edition, 1999, C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, 159–269.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Hatch DJ, Santrock RD, Smith B, Dayton P, Weil L Jr. Triplane hallux abducto valgus classification. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2018 Sep 1; 57(5):972-81.10.1053/j.jfas.2018.02.00829784530
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Deenik AR, de Visser E, Louwerens JW, de Waal Malefijt M, Draijer FF, de Bie RA. Hallux valgus angle as main predictor for correction of hallux valgus. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008 Dec; 9(1):70.10.1186/1471-2474-9-70240578018482455
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Torkki M, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S, Hoikka V, Laippala P, Paavolainen P. Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001 May 16; 285(19):2474-80.10.1001/jama.285.19.247411368700
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Plaass C, Karch A, Koch A, Wiederhoeft V, Ettinger S, Claassen L, Daniilidis K, Yao D, Stukenborg-Colsman C. Short term results of dynamic splinting for hallux valgus—A prospective randomized study. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2019 Jan 21.10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.00230718168
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Mann RA. Mann’s surgery of the foot and ankle E-Book: Expert Consult-Online. 2013 Sep 6, Elsevier Health Sciences.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Deenik A, Verburg A, Louwerens JW, de Waal Malefijt M, de Bie R. Evidence of treatment algorithms for hallux valgus. JSM. 2016; 1(1):1003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Mann RA, Pfeffinger L. Hallux valgus repair. DuVries modified McBride procedure. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1991 Nov; (272):213-8.10.1097/00003086-199111000-00032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Lee WC, Kim YM. Correction of hallux valgus using lateral soft-tissue release and proximal Chevron osteotomy through a medial incision. JBJS. 2007 Oct 1; 89(suppl_3):82-9.10.2106/JBJS.G.0048317908874
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Hawkins FB, Mitchell CL, Hedrick DW. Correction of hallux valgus by metatarsal osteotomy. JBJS. 1945 Jul 1; 27(3):387-94.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Pouliart N, Haentjens P, Opdecam P. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Wilson osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot & Ankle International. 1996 Jul; 17(7):388-94.10.1177/1071100796017007068832245
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Kuo CH, Huang PJ, Cheng YM, Huang KY, Chen TB, Chen YW, Lin SY. Modified Mitchell osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot & Ankle International. 1998 Sep; 19(9):585-9.10.1177/1071100798019009039763162
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Horne GE, Tanzer T, Ford MI. Chevron osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1984 Mar; (183):32-6.10.1097/00003086-198403000-00006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Nery C. Biplanar Distal Chevron Osteotomy. Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2016 Aug; 22:6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Trost M, Knieps M, Loweg L, Neiss WF, Eysel P, Frey S, Schulte TL, Bredow J. Biomechanical comparison of conventional versus modified technique in distal chevron osteotomies of the first metatarsal: A cadaver study. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2019 Oct 1; 25(5):665-9.10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.00930321928
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Peterson DA, Zilberfarb JL, Greene MA, Colgrove RC. Avascular necrosis of the first metatarsal head: incidence in distal osteotomy combined with lateral soft tissue release. Foot & Ankle International. 1994 Feb; 15(2):59-63.10.1177/1071100794015002017981801
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Chiodo CP, Schon LC, Myerson MS. Clinical results with the Ludloff osteotomy for correction of adult hallux valgus. Foot & Ankle International. 2004 Aug; 25(8):532-6.10.1177/10711007040250080415363373
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Barouk LS. Local Anatomy, Surgical Technique, and. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2000 Sep; 5(3):525.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Deenik A, van Mameren H, de Visser E, de Waal Malefijt M, Draijer F, de Bie R. Equivalent correction in scarf and chevron osteotomy in moderate and severe hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. Foot & Ankle International. 2008 Dec; 29(12):1209-15.10.3113/FAI.2008.120919138485
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Coetzee JC. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus repair: the dark side. Foot & Ankle International. 2003 Jan; 24(1):29-33.10.1177/10711007030240010412540078
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. Smith AM, Alwan T, Davies MS. Perioperative complications of the Scarf osteotomy. Foot & Ankle International. 2003 Mar; 24(3):222-7.10.1177/10711007030240030412793484
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Nyska M, Trnka HJ, Parks BG, Myerson MS. Proximal metatarsal osteotomies: a comparative geometric analysis conducted on sawbone models. Foot & Ankle International. 2002 Oct; 23(10):938-45.10.1177/10711007020230100912398147
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Markbreiter LA, Thompson FM. Proximal metatarsal osteotomy in hallux valgus correction: a comparison of crescentic and chevron procedures. Foot & Ankle International. 1997 Feb; 18(2):71-6.10.1177/1071100797018002059043877
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Easley ME, Kiebzak GM, Davis WH, Anderson RB. Prospective, randomized comparison of proximal crescentic and proximal chevron osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Foot & Ankle International. 1996 Jun; 17(6):307-16.10.1177/1071100796017006038791076
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. Rettedal D, Lowery NJ. Proximal phalangeal osteotomies for hallux abductovalgus deformity. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 2014 Apr 1; 31(2):213-20.10.1016/j.cpm.2013.12.00324685188
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Neumann JA, Reay KD, Bradley KE, Parekh SG. Staple fixation for akin proximal phalangeal osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus interphalangeus. Foot & Ankle International. 2015 Apr; 36(4):457-64.10.1177/107110071455907225413308
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. Sangeorzan BJ, Hansen ST Jr. Modified Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus. Foot & Ankle. 1989 Jun; 9(6):262-6.10.1177/1071100789009006022744666
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. Willegger M, Holinka J, Ristl R, Wanivenhaus AH, Windhager R, Schuh R. Correction power and complications of first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis for hallux valgus deformity. International Orthopaedics. 2015 Mar 1; 39(3):467-76.10.1007/s00264-014-2601-x25431215
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. Faber FW, Mulder PG, Verhaar JA. Role of first ray hypermobility in the outcome of the Hohmann and the Lapidus procedure: a prospective, randomized trial involving one hundred and one feet. JBJS. 2004 Mar 1; 86(3):486-95.10.2106/00004623-200403000-0000514996873
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. Coughlin MJ, Grebing BR, Jones CP. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for idiopathic hallux valgus: intermediate results. Foot & Ankle International. 2005 Oct; 26(10):783-92.10.1177/10711007050260100116221449
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. 42. Mahadevan D, Korim MT, Ghosh A, Allen PE, Bhatia M, Mangwani J. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis–Do joint configuration and preparation technique matter?. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2015 Jun 1; 21(2):103-7.10.1016/j.fas.2014.10.00225937409
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. 43. Schneider W, Knahr K. Keller procedure and chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: five-year results of different surgical philosophies in comparable collectives. Foot & Ankle International. 2002 Apr; 23(4):321-9.10.1177/10711007020230040611991478
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 44. Turnbull TI, Grange WI. A comparison of Keller’s arthroplasty and distal metatarsal osteotomy in the treatment of adult hallux valgus. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. 1986 Jan; 68(1):132-7.10.1302/0301-620X.68B1.35102143510214
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. 45. Cook E, Cook J, Rosenblum B, Landsman A, Giurini J, Basile P. Meta-analysis of first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2009 Mar 1; 48(2):180-90.10.1053/j.jfas.2008.10.00919232970
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. 46. Redfern D, Perera AM. Minimally invasive osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Jun 1; 19(2):181-9.10.1016/j.fcl.2014.02.00224878408
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. 47. Malagelada F, Sahirad C, Dalmau-Pastor M, Vega J, Bhumbra R, Manzanares-Céspedes MC, Laffenêtre O. Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical techniques. International Orthopaedics. 2019 Mar 14; 43(3):625-37.10.1007/s00264-018-4138-x30218181
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. 48. Ene R, Nica M, Panti Z, Pleniceanu M, Ene P, Cîrstoiu M, Cirstoiu C. Short Term Behaviour of Fixed-Loop Cortical Suspension System Used for Surgical Treatment of Hallux valgus. InKey Engineering Materials. Vol. 745, 2017, Trans Tech Publications, 134-144.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.745.134
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. 49. Dayton P, Sedberry S, Feilmeier M. Complications of metatarsal suture techniques for bunion correction: a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2015 Mar 1; 54(2):230-2.10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.01225618809
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. 50. El Attar M, El Naggar A, Samir FF, Fathi H. Short term results of osteotomy-sparing technique in management of moderate hallux valgus using TightRope system. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2018 Jun 1; 15(2):721-5.10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.049599032929881227
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rojost-2019-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8978 | Journal ISSN: 2601-5005
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 130 - 138
Published on: Feb 1, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
review,
hallux valgus,
correction,
osteotomy,
treatment algorithm,
surgical technique
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other,
Clinical medicine,
Surgery,
Surgery, other,
Orthopaedic and trauma surgery

© 2020 Mihai Nica, Bogdan Creţu, Răzvan Ene, Bogdan Şerban, Cătălin Cîrstoiu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)Next article