Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. 1. Grace JN, Sim FH. Fracture of the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988;(230):168-75.10.1097/00003086-198805000-00018
  2. 2. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1982;(165):197-9.10.1097/00003086-198205000-00029
  3. 3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. International classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification. 6th ed., 2006.
  4. 4. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999; 30.2:209-214.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70075-4
  5. 5. Merkel KD, and Johnson EW Jr. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 1986; 68.1:29-43.10.2106/00004623-198668010-00005
  6. 6. Engh GA. Periprosthetic fractures adjacent to total knee implants: treatment and clinical results. Instructional Course Lectures, 1998; 47:437-448.9571445
  7. 7. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1997; 345:113-124.10.1097/00003086-199712000-00016
  8. 8. Ritter MA et al. Rush rod fixation of supracondylar fractures above total knee arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995; 10.2:213-216.10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80130-5
  9. 9. Ayers ME, Iorio R, Healy WL. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. 2005, Springer, New York, NY, 183-194.
  10. 10. de Alencar PGC. Proposta de tratamento com enxerto ósseo cortical homólogo para a fratura distal do fêmur pós-artroplastia total do joelho. Rev. Bras. Ortop, 2001; 36.6:230-234.
  11. 11. Bobak P et al. Nailed cementoplasty: a salvage technique for rorabeck type II periprosthetic fractures in octogenarians. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010; 25.6:939-944.10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.03419775855
  12. 12. Canton G et al. Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2017; 88.Suppl 2:118.
  13. 13. Farouk O et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique?. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1999; 13.6:401-406.10.1097/00005131-199908000-0000210459598
  14. 14. Biswas SP, Kurer MH, Mackenney RP. External fixation for femoral shaft fracture after Stanmore total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 1992; 74.2:313-314.10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.15449771544977
  15. 15. Bae Dae K et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014; 22.11:2690-2697.10.1007/s00167-013-2572-223794003
  16. 16. Müller FJf, Galler M, Füchtmeier B. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures. International Orthopaedics, 2014; 38.12:2469-2472.10.1007/s00264-014-2464-125109478
  17. 17. Wanlim K, Song JH, Jung-Jae K. Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation. International Orthopaedics, 2015; 39.10:1951-1957.10.1007/s00264-015-2970-926300375
  18. 18. Boesmueller S et al. Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015; 127.19-20:770-778.10.1007/s00508-015-0818-326187336
  19. 19. Lotzien S et al. Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019; 29.1:189-196.10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z29931530
  20. 20. Ponzer S, Skoog A, Bergström G. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA) Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe). Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 2003; 74.6:756-763.10.1080/0001647031001832414763711
  21. 21. Austin SR et al. Why summary comorbidity measures such as the Charlson comorbidity index and Elixhauser score work. Medical Care, 2015; 53.9:e65.10.1097/MLR.0b013e318297429c381834123703645
  22. 22. Viral G et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: clinical comparison and related complications of the femur plate system and retrograde-inserted supracondylar nail. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2014; 15.3:201-207.10.1007/s10195-014-0287-x418264424687558
  23. 23. Meneghini RM et al. Modern retrograde intramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylar femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014; 29.7:1478-1481.10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.02524581897
  24. 24. Park J, Ju Hong L. Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016; 136.3:331-338.10.1007/s00402-015-2374-826646847
  25. 25. Matlovich NF et al. Outcomes of surgical management of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017; 32.1:189-192.10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.05627639307
  26. 26. Kyriakidis T et al. Locking plates versus retrograde intramedullary nails in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures. A retrospective multicenter comparative study. Injury, 2019.10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019
  27. 27. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011; 55.2:111.10.4103/0019-5049.79879
  28. 28. Hoellwarth JS et al. Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement. Injury, 2018; 49.2:392-397.10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040
  29. 29. Leino OK et al. Operative results of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur in a single academic unit. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 2015; 104.3:200-207.10.1177/1457496914552343
  30. 30. Saidi K et al. Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision components, distal femoral replacement prosthesis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014; 29.1:110-114.10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.012
  31. 31. Çiçek H et al. An alternative treatment for osteoporotic Su Type III periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: Double locking plate fixation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 2018; 52.2:92-96.10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010
  32. 32. Zwingmann J et al. Long-term function following periprosthetic fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2016; 83.6:381-387.
  33. 33. Bonnevialle P et al. Interprosthetic femoral fractures: Morbidity and mortality in a retrospective, multicenter study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2019; 105.4:579-585.
  34. 34. Hoffmann MF, Lotzien S, Schildhauer TA. Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates. Injury, 2016; 47.4:934-938.10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.02626792022
  35. 35. Vestermark GL, Odum SM, Springer BD. Early femoral condyle insufficiency fractures after total knee arthroplasty: treatment with delayed surgery and femoral component revision. Arthroplasty Today, 2018; 4.2:249-253.10.1016/j.artd.2018.02.013
  36. 36. de Alencar PGC et al. Periprosthetic fractures in total knee arthroplasty. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 2010; 45.3:230-235.10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30362-1
  37. 37. Kim HJ et al. Successful outcome with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2017; 103.2:263-268.10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.00727890690
  38. 38. Schreiner AJ et al. Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty–an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2018; 19.1:323.10.1186/s12891-018-2250-030200931613185530200931
  39. 39. Morwood MP et al. Outcomes of fixation for periprosthetic tibia fractures around and below total knee arthroplasty. Injury, 2019; 50.4:978-982.10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.01430929804
  40. 40. Mardian S et al. Quality of life and functional outcome of periprosthetic fractures around the knee following knee arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2015; 82.82:113-8.
  41. 41. Nagwadia H, Prateek J. Outcome of osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018; 28.4:683-690.10.1007/s00590-017-2121-729299767
  42. 42. Schreiner AJ et al. Komplikationen in der Behandlung periprothetischer Frakturen bei einliegender Knietotalendoprothese eine klinisch-radiologische Outcome-Analyse. Z Orthop Unfall, 2018;287-297.
  43. 43. Cordeiro EN et al. Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1990; 252:182-189.10.1097/00003086-199003000-00027
  44. 44. Douglas DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. JBJS, 2001; 83.1:120.10.2106/00004623-200101000-00016
  45. 45. Yoo JD, Nam KK. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 2015; 27,1:1-9. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.1.1.10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.1.1434963925750888
  46. 46. Canton G et al. Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2017; 88.Suppl 2:118.
  47. 47. Whitehouse MR, Sanchit M. Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2014; 7.2:136-144.10.1007/s12178-014-9216-0409220624682988
  48. 48. King SW et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Maturitas, 2018; 117:1-5.10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.01030314554
  49. 49. Kuzyk PRT, Watts E, Backstein D. Revision total knee arthroplasty for the management of periprosthetic fractures. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2017; 25.9:624-633.10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-0068028837455
  50. 50. Sheu Y et al. Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2014; 29.1:234-241.10.1002/jbmr.2016383069523775783
  51. 51. Khazai NB, Beck GR, Umpierrez GE. Diabetes and fractures—an overshadowed association. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity, 2009; 16.6:435.10.1097/MED.0b013e328331c7eb374649719779334
  52. 52. Gonnelli S et al. Obesity and fracture risk. Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism: the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2014; 11,1:9-14.10.11138/ccmbm/2014.11.1.009406444825002873
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rojost-2019-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8978 | Journal ISSN: 2601-5005
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 119
Published on: Feb 1, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Bogdan Creţu, Bogdan Şerban, Marius Zaharia, Cosmina Stoican, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.