Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Laboratory Test Methods for Assessing the Abrasivity of Rocks and Soils in Geotechnology and Mining Applications Cover

Laboratory Test Methods for Assessing the Abrasivity of Rocks and Soils in Geotechnology and Mining Applications

By: B. Janc,  V. Jovičić and  Ž. Vukelić  
Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Wear of tools in geotechnology and mining engineering. The most typical devices for each field are shown (adapted from [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]).

Figure 2

Tribological system (schematic).

Figure 3

CERCHAR-type testing apparatus (adapted from [17]).

Figure 4

West-type testing apparatus (adapted from [17]).

Figure 5

Steel pin. (a) Before the test. (b) After the test (d is the wear flat) (adapted from [18]).

Figure 6

The two halves of the sample disc with test scratches (1–5) after Brazilian tensile test. (a) Rough surface. (b) Smooth surface (adapted from [20]).

Figure 7

Measurements of pin wear. (a) Side view (d is the distance between the edges of the worn surface). (b) Top view (d1 and d2 are diameters of the worn pin, measured from two orthogonal directions) (adapted from [17]).

Figure 8

LCPC abrasivity testing device with main components (adapted from [18]).

Figure 9

Schematic representation of metal impeller before and after the LCPC test: 1 new impeller, 2 not abrasive, 3 abrasive/very abrasive, 4 very abrasive and 5 extremely abrasive (adapted from [21]).

Figure 10

Correlation between LAC and CAI [21].

Figure 11

NTNU/SINTEF abrasivity device (adapted from [22]).

Figure 12

Test specimen for rock abrasivity test AV and AVS (adapted from [23]).

Figure 13

Test specimen for soil abrasivity test SATTM (adapted from [23]).

Figure 14

RIAT device (adapted from [24]).

Figure 15

Gouging abrasion test apparatus. (a) Front view. (b) Side view (adapted from [2]).

Figure 16

Wear contact between tool and rock sample (adapted from [2]).

Figure 17

Rock sample after testing (schematic). Numbers 1–6 represent individual scratches from the test (adapted from [2]).

Main parameters of the CERCHAR abrasivity test_

ParametersValue
Load (N)70
Stylus hardness (HRC)55 ± 1
Test scratch length (mm)10
Sample materialRock (freshly broken surface)
CERCHARWEST
Test duration (s)110
Test resultCERCHAR abrasivity index (CAI)

Main parameters of the gouging abrasion test_

ParametersValue
Impact energy (J)300
Wear tool hardness (HRC)40–42
Test scratch length (mm)78
Sample materialRock (smooth surface)
Test resultGouging abrasion index (Gi)

Main parameters of the LCPC abrasivity test_

ParametersValue
Rotational speed (min−1)4,500
Sample materialSoil/granular material
Grain size of the sample (mm)4–6.3
Sample mass (g)500 ± 2
Test duration (min)5
Test resultLCPC abrasivity coefficient (LAC)
LCPC breakability coefficient (LBC)

Classification of LCPC abrasivity coefficient (LAC) in relation to the CERCHAR abrasivity index (CAI) [21]_

LAC (g/t)CAI (0.1 mm)Abrasivity term
0–500–0.3Not abrasive
50–1000.3–0.5Not very abrasive
100–2500.5–1.0Slightly abrasive
250–5001.0–2.0(Medium) abrasive
500–1,2502.0–4.0Very abrasive
1,250–2,0004.0–6.0Extremely abrasive

Main parameters of the RIAT [24]_

ParametersValue
Thrust (N)1,250
Rolling velocity (min−1)40
Test duration (min)30
Disc hardness (HRC)50 ± 1
Sample materialRock (smooth surface)
Test resultRIAT abrasivity index (RIATa)
RIAT indentation index (RIATi)

Classification of the CERCHAR abrasivity index (CAI) [17]_

Mean value of CAIClassification/abrasivity description
0.1–0.4Extremely low
0.5–0.9Very low
1.0–1.9Low
2.0–2.9Medium
3.0–3.9High
4.0–4.9Very high
≥5Extremely high

Classification of rock and soil abrasion on tungsten carbide (AV) and cutter steel (AVS, SATTM) test specimen [22]_

AbrasionAV (mg)AVS (mg)SATTM (mg)
Extremely high≥58.0≥44.0
Very high42.0–57.936.0–44.0
High28.0–41.926.0–35.9≥22.0
Medium11.0–27.913.0–25.97.0–22.0
Low4.0–10.94.0–12.9≤7.0
Very low1.1–3.91.1–3.9
Extremely low≤1.0≤1.0

Main parameters of the NTNU/SINTEF abrasivity tests_

ParametersValue
Load (N)100
Rotational speed (min−1)20
Material mass flow (g/min)80
AVAVSSATTM
Test duration (min)511
Sample materialCrushed rock powderCrushed rock powdersoil
Grain size of the sample (mm)<1<1<4
Test specimen materialTungsten carbideCutter ring steelCutter ring steel
Test resultAV valueAVS valueSATTM value
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 118
Submitted on: Aug 17, 2020
|
Accepted on: Sep 7, 2020
|
Published on: Oct 17, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 B. Janc, V. Jovičić, Ž. Vukelić, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.