Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The use of social media and its influence on rhinoplasty decision Cover

The use of social media and its influence on rhinoplasty decision

Romanian Journal of Rhinology
Volume 14 (2024): Issue 53 (March 2024)
By: Felicia Manole,  Nuray Bayar Muluk,  Can Cemal Cingi and  Cemal Cingi  
Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Gruber RP, Stepnick D. Rhinoplasty: current concepts, an issue of clinics in plastic surgery. 1st Edition. E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Shiffman MA. History of cosmetic rhinoplasty. In: Shiffman MA, Di Giuseppe A. (eds.) Advanced aesthetic rhinoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2013, p. 133-5.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Most SP. Trends in functional rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(6):410-3. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.10.6.410.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Walker ME, Patel A, Alcon A, Pavri S, Shah A, Ng R, et al. A 12-year analysis of the relationship between market trends and cosmetic case volume. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4S-1):43-4. DOI: 10.1097/01. prs.0000455376.21154.de.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Markey CN, Markey PM. Correlates of young women’s interest in obtaining cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles. 2009;61:158-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9625-5.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Jejurikar SS, Rovak JM, Kuzon WM Jr, Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Cederna PS. Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(5):460-5. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200211000-00003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Alghamdi W, Qobty A, Al amri D. Effect of social media on decision to undergo rhinoplasty. Glob J Otolaryngol. 2020;22(4):556094. DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2020.22.556094.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Hedén P, Otte M. The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(2):270-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center. 2016;11:1-18. Available from: https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/11/10132827/PI_2016.11.11_Social-Media-Update_FINAL.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Lee PB, Miano DI, Sesselmann M, Johnson J, Chung MT, Abboud M, et al. RealSelf social media analysis of rhinoplasty patient reviews. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(7):2368-74. DOI: 10.1016/j. bjps.2022.02.060.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Allen KA, Ryan T, Gray DL, McInerney DM, Waters L. Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: The positives and the potential pitfalls. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist. 2014;31(1):18-31. DOI: 10.1017/edp.2014.2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing Social Media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(5):777-81. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Öztürk G, Beyazyüz E, Albayrak Y. Social media addiction among women who underwent cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2012;8(2):46-50.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Sheldon P, Bryant K. Instagram: motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:89-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(3):311. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030311.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Brevers D, Turel O. Strategies for self-controlling Social Media use: Classification and role in preventing social media addiction symptoms. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(3):554-63. DOI: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.49.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Özgür E, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Is selfie a new cause of increasing rhinoplasties? Facial Plastic Surg. 2017;33(4):423-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603781.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Sajjadian A, Guyuron B. Primary rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(4):527-39; quiz 540. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X10380388.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Ünal-Aydın P, Balıkçı K, Sönmez İ, Aydın O. Associations between emotion recognition and social networking site addiction. Psychiatry Res. 2020;284:112673. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112673.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2018 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report; 2019. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/News/Statistics/2018/Plastic-Surgery-Statistics-Full-Report-2018.Pdf. Accessed March 12, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Reham A, Ahmed A, Lulwah A, Tawil L, Alrajeh A, Mohammed A. The reasons behind the trend of facial plastic surgery in Saudi Arabia. Sch J Otolaryngol. 2019;1(4):93-8. DOI: 10.32474/SJO.2019.01.000121.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. De Vries DA, Peter J, Nikken P, de Graaf H. The effect of social network site use on appearance investment and desire for cosmetic surgery among adolescent boys and girls. Sex Roles. 2014;71:283-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-014-0412-6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Obeid FM, Mortada H, Alsulaiman M, Faisal AlSwaji G. The use of social media and its influence on undergoing rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(6):e4375. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004375.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Aldosari BF, Alkarzae M, Almuhaya R, Aldhahri R, Alrashid H. Effect of media on facial plastic surgery in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2019;11(11):e6232. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6232.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Furnham A, Levitas J. Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(4):e47-e50.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Arab K, Barasain O, Altaweel A, Alkhayyal J, Alshiha L, Barasain R, et al. Influence of social media on the decision to undergo a cosmetic procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(8):e2333. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002333.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Akar E, Topçu B. An examination of the factors influencing consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing. J Internet Commer. 2011;10(1):35-67. DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2011.558456.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Rehman FU, Ilyas M, Nawaz T, Hyder S. How Facebook advertising affects buying behavior of young consumers: The moderating role of gender. Acad Res Int. 2014;5:395-404.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Tiggemann M, McGill B. The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2004;23(1):23-44. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.23.1.23.26991.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R. Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1184-93. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a072.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD. Patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: A social media analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(1):NP1-5. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv095.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Mueller MA, Glassett TS, Burke SM, Nichter LS. Protecting a plastic surgeon’s reputation: damage control for dishonest online reviews. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(4):670e-671e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318282792a.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Israel JS, Mandel BA, Bentz ML, Afifi AM. Tweeting all surgeons: update your Facebook status, enhance your reputation, and ‘pin’ your practice on the wild, wild web. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):865e-868e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a14f.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Nathan B, Nathan M, Mascarenhas L. Analysis of formal complaints in 1840 consecutive primary breast augmentations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):883e-884e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c65a.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Domanski MC, Cavale N. Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(6):1292-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9977-z.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. RealSelf. http://www.realself.com. Accessed July 6, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, Adamson PA. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications. Aesthetic Surg J. 2011;31(7):775-80. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X11417427.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Rohrich RJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: when the postoperative reflection does not meet patients’ expectations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(55):15S-17S. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000794780.52391.ca.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Slator R, Harris DL. Are rhinoplasty patients potentially mad? Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(4):307-10. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90058-6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Rohrich RJ, Janis JE, Kenkel JM. Male rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(4):1071-85; quiz 1086. DOI: 10.1097/01. PRS.0000076201.75278.BB.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Gorney M, Martello J. Patient selection criteria. Clin Plast Surg. 1999;26(1):37-40, vi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Hessler JL, Moyer CA, Kim JC, Baker SR, Moyer JS. Predictors of satisfaction with facial plastic surgery: results of a prospective study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12(3):192-6. DOI: 10.1001/arch-facial.2009.69.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Meyer L, Jacobsson S. Psychiatric and psychosocial characteristics of patients accepted for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19(2):117-30. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198708000-00003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Meyer L, Jacobsson S. The predictive validity of psycho-social factors for patients’ acceptance of rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1986;17(6):513-20. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198612000-00013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Picavet VA, Gabriels L, Grietens J, Jorissen M, Prokopakis EP, Hellings PW. Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(4):861-8. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818f02.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Zojaji R, Arshadi HR, Keshavarz M, Farsibaf MM, Golzari F, Khorashadizadeh M. Personality characteristics of patients seeking cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(6):1090-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-014-0420-7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjr-2024-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2393-3356 | Journal ISSN: 2069-6523
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 9
Submitted on: Aug 28, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 9, 2023
Published on: Feb 21, 2024
Published by: Romanian Rhinologic Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
social media,
rhinoplasty,
selfies,
patient satisfaction,
male,
female
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other,
Surgery,
Surgery, other,
Otorhinolaryngology,
Speech, voice and paediatric hearing disorders,
Oromaxillofacial surgery

© 2024 Felicia Manole, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Can Cemal Cingi, Cemal Cingi, published by Romanian Rhinologic Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2024): Issue 53 (March 2024)Next article