Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Anthropometric aspects used to treat fractures of the naso-orbito-ethmoido-maxillary (NOEM) complex in cases of facial trauma

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. 1. Przygocka A, Podgórski M, Jędrzejewski K, Topol M, Polguj M. The location of the infraorbital foramen in human skulls, to be used as new anthropometric landmarks as a useful method for maxillofacial surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2012;71(3):198-204.
  2. 2. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D, Sansuk R, Phetphunphiphat W. Supraorbital notch/foramen, infraorbital foramen and mental foramen in thais: anthropometric measurements and surgical relevance. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(5):675-82.
  3. 3. Aziz SR, Marchena JJ, Puran A. Anatomic characteristics of the infra-orbital foramen: a cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(9):992-6. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.8742.
  4. 4. Boopathi S, Chakravarthy Marx S, Dhalapathy S, Anupa S. Anthropometric analysis of the infraorbital foramen in South Indian population. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(9):730-5.
  5. 5. Pagnoni M, Marenco M, Ramieri V, Terenzi V, Bartoli D, Amodeo G et al. Late treatment of orbital fractures: a new analysis for surgical planning. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(6):439-45.
  6. 6. Baril SE, Yoon MK. Naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures: a review. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53(4):149-55. DOI: 10.1097/IIO. ob013e31829cf077.
  7. 7. Fraioli RE, Branstetter B, Deleyiannis FWB. Facial fractures: beyond Le Fort. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(1):51-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2007.10.003.
  8. 8. Costan VV, Popescu E, Sulea D, Stratulat IS. A new indication for barbed threads: static reanimation of the paralyzed face. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(3):639-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.176.
  9. 9. Gruss JS. Naso-ethmoid-orbital fractures: classification and role of primary bone grafting. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(3):303-17.
  10. 10. Paskert JP, Manson PN, Iliff NT. Nasoethmoidal and orbital fractures. Clin Plast Surg. 1988;15(2):209-23.
  11. 11. Nkenke E, Benz M, Maier T, Wiltfang J, Holbach LM, Kramer M, et al. Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31(6):362-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2003.07.001.
  12. 12. Torres MGG, Campos PSF, Segundo NPN, Navarro M, Crusoe-Rebello I. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes. Implant Dent. 2012;21(2):150-5. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824bf93c.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjr-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2393-3356 | Journal ISSN: 2069-6523
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 77
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 20, 2022
Published on: Apr 30, 2022
Published by: Romanian Rhinologic Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Andrei Mihail Rosu, Daniela Sulea, Oana Cristina Rosu, Mihail Dan Cobzeanu, Geanina Bandol, Liliana Gheorghe Moisii, Luiza Maria Cobzeanu, Victor Vlad Costan, Dragos Octavian Palade, Bogdan Mihail Cobzeanu, published by Romanian Rhinologic Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.