Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia Cover

A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia

Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Volume 26 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)
By: Oksana V. Riazanova,  Yuri S. Alexandrovich,  Yana V. Guseva and  Alexander M. Ioscovich  
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1. Aleksandrovich YS, Murieva EA, Pshenisnov KV, Riazanova OV. Hormonal status of the mother and her newborn child after using long-term epidural analgesia in childbirth. Pediatrician 2011; 2: 51-55
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Ding T, Wang DX, Qu Y, Chen Q, Zhu SN. Epidural labor analgesia is associated with a decreased risk of postpartum depression: a prospective cohort study. Anesth Analg 2014; 119: 383-392. doi: 10.1213/ANE.000000000000010710.1213/ANE.000000000000010724797120
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Suhitharan T, Pham TP, Chen H, Assam PN, Sultana R, Han NL, et al. Investigating analgesic and psychological factors associated with risk of postpartum depression development: a case-control study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016; 12: 1333-1339. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S10591810.2147/NDT.S105918490893627354803
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Riazanova OV, Aleksandrovich YS, Reznik VA, Gorkovaya IA, Korgozha MA, Ioskovich A. Labor pain relief and postpartum depression. Is there a correlation? Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2017; 66: 11-19. doi: 10.17816/JOWD66511-2010.17816/JOWD66511-20
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NNA, Leong WL, Oh TT, Siddiqui FJ, et al. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5:CD011344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011344.pub210.1002/14651858.CD011344.pub2649458929770432
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Gambling DR, Yu P, Cole C, McMorland GH, Palmer L. A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Can J Anaesth 1988; 35: 249-254. doi: 10.1007/BF03010618328976910.1007/BF030106183289769
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.00410.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.0041615473516154735
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Fettes PD, Moore CS, Whiteside JB, McLeod GA, Wildsmith JA. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 359-364. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael15716849382
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 904-909. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a16492849
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Sia AT, Leo S, Ocampo CE. A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 267-275. doi: 10.1111/anae.1209323278328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Nekolaichuk CL, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor PG. A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 466-476. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1055oa10.1191/0269216305pm1055oa16218159
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 826-831. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b810.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b821788309
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.03810.1016/j.bja.2018.03.03830032882
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Riazanova OV, Aleksandrovich YS. The use of levobupivacaine for the regional anesthesia/analgesia in the obstetrical and gynecological practice. Literature review. Russian journal of anaesthesiology and Reanimatology 2018; 63: 16-20
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Nunes J, Nunes S, Veiga M, Cortez M, Seifert I. A prospective, randomized, blinded-endpoint, controlled study – continuous epidural infusion versus programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2016; 66: 439-444. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2015.10.00310.1016/j.bjan.2015.10.00327432527
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Kumar K, Singh SI. Neuraxial opioid-induced prupitus: an update. J Anesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013; 29: 303-307. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.11704510.4103/0970-9185.117045378822524106351
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Armstrong S, Fernando R. Side Effects and Efficacy of Neuraxial Opioids in Pregnant Patients at Delivery: A Comprehensive Review. Drug Saf 2016; 39: 381-399. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0386-510.1007/s40264-015-0386-526832926
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Lim Y, Chakravarty S, Ocampo CE, Sia AT. Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 894-899. doi: 10.1177/0310057X100380051410.1177/0310057X100380051420865875
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Lin Y, Li Q, Liu J, Yang R, Liu J. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016; 12: 1107-1112. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S10602110.2147/TCRM.S106021494871427471390
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Ferrer LE, Romero DJ, Vásquez OI, Matute EC, Van de Velde M. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 915-922. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4510-x10.1007/s00404-017-4510-x28884414
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 133-144. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b2610.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b2623223119
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A Comparison of a Basal Infusion with Automated Mandatory Boluses in Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labour. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 673-678. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.6010.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.6017312228
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Leo S, Ocampo CE, Lim Y, Sia AT. A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010; 19: 357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.00610.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.00620832282
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 301-306. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171109.53832.8d10.1097/01.AOG.0000171109.53832.8d16055579
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2019-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2502-0307 | Journal ISSN: 2392-7518
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 30
Submitted on: Aug 27, 2018
|
Accepted on: Apr 2, 2019
|
Published on: Jun 18, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
delivery,
patient controlled epidural analgesia,
programmed intermittent epidural bolus,
continuous infusion,
Bromage scale
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other,
Surgery,
Surgery, other,
Anaesthesiology,
Emergency medicine and intensive-care medicine

© 2019 Oksana V. Riazanova, Yuri S. Alexandrovich, Yana V. Guseva, Alexander M. Ioscovich, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)Next article