Sat4BIM4D — the concept of using satellite remote sensing to monitor construction progress in conjunction with BIM

Glinka, Szymon

doi:10.2478/rgg-2024-0023

Abstract

Monitoring the progress of construction work and adhering to the schedule is crucial for the timely completion of projects. Integrating data from various sensors (e.g., cameras, laser scanners) mounted on diverse platforms (rovers, drones, satellites) with BIM 4D (Building Information Modelling) enables effective construction control solutions. By leveraging 3D models enriched with temporal information, project management can be significantly enhanced. This paper focuses on a comprehensive review of current literature and state-of-the-art practices to design a framework for integrating satellite remote sensing data with BIM 4D, termed the Sat4BIM4D method. Proposals for this method are developed alongside algorithms for processing satellite-derived data to monitor construction progress, particularly for infrastructure projects. The study emphasizes the compatibility and synergy between satellite data and BIM 4D, providing a structured direction for future research. Advantages, limitations, and potential challenges of the proposed approach are also critically analyzed to pave the way for further development in this domain.

References

Akanmu, A. and Anumba, C. J. (2015). Cyber-physical systems integration of building information models and the physical construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(5):516–535, doi:10.1108/ecam-07-2014-0097.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Al-Wassai, F. A. and Kalyankar, N. V. (2013). Major limitations of satellite images. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 4 (5), May 2013, 51-59, doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1307.2434.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arbad, A. P., Arifin, Z. N., Martina, N., Nindya, E. P., and Nurfa, M. A. (2023). Monitoring work progress of dam construction based on photogrammetric point clouds and BIM: Practical approach to teaching industry. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-5/W1-2023:1–5, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-5-w1-2023-1-2023.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arif, F. and Khan, W. A. (2020). A real-time productivity tracking framework using Survey-Cloud-BIM integration. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(10):8699–8710, doi:10.1007/s13369-020-04844-5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arif, F. and Khan, W. A. (2021). Smart progress monitoring framework for building construction elements using Videography–MATLAB–BIM integration. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(6):717–732, doi:10.1007/s40999-021-00601-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asadi, K., Ramshankar, H., Noghabaei, M., and Han, K. (2019). Real-time image localization and registration with BIM using perspective alignment for indoor monitoring of construction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(5), doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000847.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Babič, N. v., Podbreznik, P., and Rebolj, D. (2010). Integrating resource production and construction using BIM. Automation in Construction, 19(5):539–543, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.005.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barbosa, A. S. and Costa, D. B. (2022). Use of BIM and visual data collected by UAS and 360° camera for construction progress monitoring. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101(8):082007, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1101/8/082007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J., Mischke, J., Ribeirinho, M. J., Sridhar, M., Parsons, M., Bertram, N., and Brown, S. (2017). Reinventing construction: A route of higher productivity. Technical report, McKinsey Global Institute.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Behnam, A., Wickramasinghe, D. C., Ghaffar, M. A. A., Vu, T. T., Tang, Y. H., and Isa, H. B. M. (2016). Automated progress monitoring system for linear infrastructure projects using satellite remote sensing. Automation in Construction, 68:114–127, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114:103179, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bortolini, R., Formoso, C. T., and Viana, D. D. (2019). Site logistics planning and control for engineer-to-order prefabricated building systems using BIM 4D modeling. Automation in Construction, 98:248–264, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.031.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bosché, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C. T., and Haas, R. (2015). The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components. Automation in Construction, 49:201–213, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A. and Borrmann, A. (2019). Combining inverse photogrammetry and BIM for automated labeling of construction site images for machine learning. Automation in Construction, 106:102879, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102879.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., Borrmann, A., Tuttas, S., and Stilla, U. (2017). Classification of detection states in construction progress monitoring. In eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction – Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, ECPPM 2016, September 2016, pages 473–479. CRC Press, doi:10.1201/9781315386904-68.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., Tuttas, S., Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2015). A concept for automated construction progress monitoring using BIM-based geometric constraints and photogrammetric point clouds. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 20(5):68–79.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., Tuttas, S., Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2020). Improving progress monitoring by fusing point clouds, semantic data and computer vision. Automation in Construction, 116:103210, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103210.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., Tuttas, S., Stilla, U., and Borrmann, A. (2016). Incorporating knowledge on construction methods into automated progress monitoring techniques. In 23rd International Workshop of the European Group for Intelligent Computing in Engineering, EG-ICE 2016, pages 1–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., Tuttas, S., Stilla, U., and Borrmann, A. (2018). Process-and computer vision-based detection of as-built components on construction sites. In Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), ISARC2017. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC), doi:10.22260/isarc2018/0091.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, A., B. A. T. S. . S. U. (2015). Towards automated construction progress monitoring using BIM-based point cloud processing. In EWork and EBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction – Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, ECPPM, pages 101–107. doi:10.1201/b17396-20.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charef, R., Alaka, H., and Emmitt, S. (2018). Beyond the third dimension of BIM: A systematic review of literature and assessment of professional views. Journal of Building Engineering, 19:242–257, doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.028.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi, T. and Seo, Y. (2020). A real-time physical progress measurement method for schedule performance control using vision, an AR marker and machine learning in a ship block assembly process. Sensors, 20(18):5386, doi:10.3390/s20185386.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Winter, H., Bassier, M., De Geyter, S., and Vergauwen, M. (2022). Automatic calculation of volume changes in road construction. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-2/W2-2022:23–30, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-2-w2-2022-23-2022.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demir, I., Koperski, K., Lindenbaum, D., Pang, G., Huang, J., Basu, S., Hughes, F., Tuia, D., and Raskar, R. (2018). Deep-Globe 2018: A challenge to parse the Earth through satellite images. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pages 172–17209. IEEE, doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00031.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demirdöğen, G., Diren, N. S., Aladağ, H., and Işık, Z. (2021). Lean based maturity framework integrating value, BIM and big data analytics: Evidence from AEC industry. Sustainability, 13(18):10029, doi:10.3390/su131810029.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deng, H., Hong, H., Luo, D., Deng, Y., and Su, C. (2020). Automatic indoor construction process monitoring for tiles based on BIM and computer vision. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1), doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001744.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deng, M., Menassa, C. C., and Kamat, V. R. (2021). From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26:58–83, doi:10.36680/j.itcon.2021.005.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deng, Y., Wu, C., Li, M., and Chen, R. (2015). RNDSI: A ratio normalized difference soil index for remote sensing of urban/suburban environments. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 39:40–48, doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.010.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dimitrov, A. and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2014). Vision-based material recognition for automated monitoring of construction progress and generating building information modeling from unordered site image collections. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 28(1):37–49, doi:10.1016/j.aei.2013.11.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duarte-Vidal, L., Herrera, R. F., Atencio, E., and Muñoz-La Rivera, F. (2021). Interoperability of digital tools for the monitoring and control of construction projects. Applied Sciences, 11(21):10370, doi:10.3390/app112110370.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Durdyev, S. and Hosseini, M. R. (2019). Causes of delays on construction projects: A comprehensive list. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1):20–46, doi:10.1108/ijmpb-09-2018-0178.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D’Amico, F., Bertolini, L., Napolitano, A., Romer Diezmos Manalo, J., Gagliardi, V., and Bianchini Ciampoli, L. (2022). Implementation of an interoperable BIM platform integrating ground-based and remote sensing information for network-level infrastructures monitoring. In Schulz, K., Nikolakopoulos, K. G., and Michel, U., editors, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XIII, page 21. SPIE, doi:10.1117/12.2638108.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elghaish, F., Matarneh, S., Talebi, S., Kagioglou, M., Hosseini, M. R., and Abrishami, S. (2020). Toward digitalization in the construction industry with immersive and drones technologies: A critical literature review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(3):345–363, doi:10.1108/sasbe-06-2020-0077.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ElQasaby, A. R., Alqahtani, F. K., and Alheyf, M. (2022). State of the art of BIM integration with sensing technologies in construction progress monitoring. Sensors, 22(9):3497, doi:10.3390/s22093497.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Engman, E. T. (1999). Remote sensing in hydrology, pages 165–177. American Geophysical Union, doi:10.1029/gm108p0165.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fouladinejad, F., Matkan, A., Hajeb, M., and Brakhasi, F. (2019). History and applications of space-borne lidars. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-4/W18:407–414, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w18-407-2019.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gagliardi, V., Bianchini Ciampoli, L., D’Amico, F., Alani, A. M., Tosti, F., Battagliere, M. L., and Benedetto, A. (2020). Bridge monitoring and assessment by high-resolution satellite remote sensing technologies. In Valenta, C. R., Shaw, J. A., and Kimata, M., editors, SPIE Future Sensing Technologies, page 4. SPIE, doi:10.1117/12.2579700.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gagliardi, V., Tosti, F., Bianchini Ciampoli, L., Battagliere, M. L., D’Amato, L., Alani, A. M., and Benedetto, A. (2023). Satellite remote sensing and non-destructive testing methods for transport infrastructure monitoring: Advances, challenges and perspectives. Remote Sensing, 15(2):418, doi:10.3390/rs15020418.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gheorghe, M., Armas_,, I., Dumitru, P., Călin, A., Bădescu, O., and Necsoiu, M. (2019). Monitoring subway construction using Sentinel-1 data: A case study in Bucharest, Romania. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(7):2644–2663, doi:10.1080/01431161.2019.1694723.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gledson, B. and Greenwood, D. (2016). Surveying the extent and use of 4D BIM in the UK. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 21:57–71.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glinka, S. (2022). Cross-sectional SWOT analysis of BIM and GIS integration. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 16(3):157–183, doi:10.7494/geom.2022.16.3.157.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glinka, S., Bajer, J., Wierzbicki, D., Karwowska, K., and Kedzierski, M. (2023). The use of deep learning methods for object height estimation in high resolution satellite images. Sensors, 23(19):8162, doi:10.3390/s23198162.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glinka, S., Owerko, T., and Tomaszkiewicz, K. (2022). Using open vector-based spatial data to create semantic datasets for building segmentation for raster data. Remote Sensing, 14(12):2745, doi:10.3390/rs14122745.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2009). D4AR– a 4-dimensional augmented reality model for automating construction progress monitoring data collection, processing and communication. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 14(13):129–153.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Golparvar-Fard, M., Pena-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2011a). Monitoring changes of 3D building elements from unordered photo collections. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), pages 249–256. IEEE, doi:10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130250.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2011b). Integrated sequential as-built and as-planned representation with D4AR tools in support of decision-making tasks in the AEC/FM industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12):1099–1116, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000371.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2015). Automated progress monitoring using unordered daily construction photographs and IFC-based Building Information Models. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(1), doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Golparvar-Fard, M., Savarese, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2010). Automated model-based recognition of progress using daily construction photographs and IFC-based 4D models. In Construction Research Congress 2010, pages 51–60. American Society of Civil Engineers, doi:10.1061/41109(373)6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grieves, M. (2014). Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White paper, 1(2014):1–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, K. K. and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2014a). Automated monitoring of operation-level construction progress using 4D BIM and daily site photologs. In Construction Research Congress 2014, pages 1033–1042. American Society of Civil Engineers, doi:10.1061/9780784413517.106.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, K. K. and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2014b). Multi-sample image-based material recognition and formalized sequencing knowledge for operation-level construction progress monitoring. In Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), pages 364–372. American Society of Civil Engineers, doi:10.1061/9780784413616.046.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, K. K. and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2015). Appearance-based material classification for monitoring of operation-level construction progress using 4D BIM and site photologs. Automation in Construction, 53:44–57, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, K. K. and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2017). Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study. Automation in Construction, 73:184–198, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, K. K., Muthukumar, B., and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2016). Enhanced appearance-based material classification for the monitoring of operation-level construction progress through the removal of occlusions. In Construction Research Congress 2016, pages 879–889. American Society of Civil Engineers, doi:10.1061/9780784479827.089.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heesom, D. and Mahdjoubi, L. (2004). Trends of 4D CAD applications for construction planning. Construction Management and Economics, 22(2):171–182, doi:10.1080/0144619042000201376.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ibrahim, A., Golparvar-Fard, M., and El-Rayes, K. (2021). Metrics and methods for evaluating model-driven reality capture plans. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 37(1):55–72, doi:10.1111/mice.12693.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ISO 16739-1:2018 (2018). Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries – Part 1: Data schema. https://www.iso.org/standard/70303.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacob-Loyola, N., Muñoz-La Rivera, F., Herrera, R. F., and Atencio, E. (2021). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for physical progress monitoring of construction. Sensors, 21(12):4227, doi:10.3390/s21124227.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
James, D., Collin, A., Mury, A., and Costa, S. (2020). Very high resolution land use and land cover mapping using Pleiades-1 stereo imagery and machine learning. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B2-2020:675–682, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2020-675-2020.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeppesen, J. H., Jacobsen, R. H., Inceoglu, F., and Toftegaard, T. S. (2019). A cloud detection algorithm for satellite imagery based on deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 229:247–259, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.039.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jing, R., Gong, Z., and Guan, H. (2020). Land cover change detection with VHR satellite imagery based on multi-scale SLIC-CNN and SCAE features. IEEE Access, 8:228070–228087, doi:10.1109/access.2020.3045740.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jombo, S., Adam, E., and Odindi, J. (2021). Classification of tree species in a heterogeneous urban environment using object-based ensemble analysis and World View-2 satellite imagery. Applied Geomatics, 13(3):373–387, doi:10.1007/s12518-021-00358-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Joyce, K. E., Belliss, S. E., Samsonov, S. V., McNeill, S. J., and Glassey, P. J. (2009). A review of the status of satellite remote sensing and image processing techniques for mapping natural hazards and disasters. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 33(2):183–207, doi:10.1177/0309133309339563.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Juan, W., Bingru, Z., and Die, C. (2019). Research on the methods of BIM reliability prediction with the construction schedule in the application of project of chushandian reservoir. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 304(2):022084, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/304/2/022084.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Juergens, C. and Meyer-Heß, M. F. (2021). Identification of construction areas from VHR-satellite images for macroeconomic forecasts. Remote Sensing, 13(13):2618, doi:10.3390/rs13132618.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jung, Y., Hockenmaier, J., and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2024). Transformer language model for mapping construction schedule activities to uniformat categories. Automation in Construction, 157:105183, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105183.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jupp, J. (2017). 4D BIM for environmental planning and management. Procedia Engineering, 180:190–201, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.178.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karra, K., Kontgis, C., Statman-Weil, Z., Mazzariello, J. C., Mathis, M., and Brumby, S. P. (2021). Global land use / land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. In 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. IEEE, doi:10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9553499.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kielhauser, C., Renteria Manzano, R., Hoffman, J. J., and Adey, B. T. (2020). Automated construction progress and quality monitoring for commercial buildings with Unmanned Aerial Systems: An application study from Switzerland. Infrastructures, 5(11):98, doi:10.3390/infrastructures5110098.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kropp, C., Koch, C., and König, M. (2015). Integrating visual state recognition with 4D BIM based indoor progress monitoring. In EG-ICE 2015 – 22nd Workshop of the European Group of Intelligent Computing in Engineering, July, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kropp, C., Koch, C., and König, M. (2018). Interior construction state recognition with 4D BIM registered image sequences. Automation in Construction, 86:11–32, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.027.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kropp, C., König, M., and Koch, C. (2013). Object recognition in BIM registered videos for indoor progress monitoring. In International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, EG-ICE 2013 – 20th International Workshop: Intelligent Computing in Engineering, November, pages 1–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, J. H., Park, J.-H., and Jang, B.-T. (2018). Design of robot based work progress monitoring system for the building construction site. In 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, doi:10.1109/ictc.2018.8539444.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, W., He, C., Fang, J., and Fu, H. (2018). Semantic segmentation based building extraction method using multi-source GIS map datasets and satellite imagery. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pages 233–2333. IEEE, doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00043.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liao, H., Huang, B., Dong, K., Jia, Z., and Wu, J. (2023). Robot-assisted after-process progress-monitoring system based on BIM and computer vision. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pages 1–6. IEEE, doi:10.1109/robio58561.2023.10355015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, J. J., Han, K. K., and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2015). A Framework for Model-Driven Acquisition and Analytics of Visual Data Using UAVs for Automated Construction Progress Monitoring, pages 156–164. doi:10.1061/9780784479247.020.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lo, Y., Zhang, C., Ye, Z., and Cui, C. (2022). Monitoring road base course construction progress by photogrammetry-based 3D reconstruction. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(12):2087–2101, doi:10.1080/15623599.2022.2040078.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Längkvist, M., Kiselev, A., Alirezaie, M., and Loutfi, A. (2016). Classification and segmentation of satellite orthoimagery using convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 8(4):329, doi:10.3390/rs8040329.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maalek, R., Lichti, D. D., and Ruwanpura, J. (2015). Robust classification and segmentation of planar and linear features for construction site progress monitoring and structural dimension compliance control. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W5:129–136, doi:10.5194/isprsannals-ii-3-w5-129-2015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mansour, A., Hassan, A., Hussein, W. M., and Said, E. (2019). Automated vehicle detection in satellite images using deep learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 610(1):012027, doi:10.1088/1757-899x/610/1/012027.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Masood, M. K., Aikala, A., Seppänen, O., and Singh, V. (2020). Multi-building extraction and alignment for as-built point clouds: A case study with crane cameras. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, doi:10.3389/fbuil.2020.581295.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maxar (2022). WorldView Legion. https://www.maxar.com/splash/it-takes-a-legion.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mirarchi, C., Pavan, A., De Marco, F., Wang, X., and Song, Y. (2018). Supporting facility management processes through end-users’ integration and coordinated BIM-GIS technologies. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(5):191, doi:10.3390/ijgi7050191.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Navon, R. and Sacks, R. (2007). Assessing research issues in Automated Project Performance Control (APPC). Automation in Construction, 16(4):474–484, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2006.08.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nemmaoui, A., Aguilar, F. J., Aguilar, M. A., and Qin, R. (2019). DSM and DTM generation from VHR satellite stereo imagery over plastic covered greenhouse areas. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 164:104903, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.104903.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Omar, H., Mahdjoubi, L., and Kheder, G. (2018). Towards an automated photogrammetry-based approach for monitoring and controlling construction site activities. Computers in Industry, 98:172–182, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pal, A., Lin, J. J., Hsieh, S.-H., and Golparvar-Fard, M. (2024). Activity-level construction progress monitoring through semantic segmentation of 3D-informed ortho-graphic images. Automation in Construction, 157:105157, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105157.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Panagiotakis, E., Chrysoulakis, N., Charalampopoulou, V., and Pour-sanidis, D. (2018). Validation of Pleiades tri-stereo DSM in urban areas. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3):118, doi:10.3390/ijgi7030118.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Park, J., Cai, H., Dunston, P. S., and Ghasemkhani, H. (2017). Database-supported and web-based visualization for daily 4D BIM. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(10), doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001392.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patel, T., Guo, B. H., and Zou, Y. (2021). A scientometric review of construction progress monitoring studies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9):3237–3266, doi:10.1108/ecam-10-2020-0799.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pazhoohesh, M. and Zhang, C. (2015). Automated construction progress monitoring using thermal images and wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE), volume 101.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peng, D., Zhang, Y., and Guan, H. (2019). End-to-end change detection for high resolution satellite images using improved UNet++. Remote Sensing, 11(11):1382, doi:10.3390/rs11111382.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Phiri, D., Simwanda, M., Salekin, S., Nyirenda, V., Murayama, Y., and Ranagalage, M. (2020). Sentinel-2 data for land cover/use mapping: A review. Remote Sensing, 12(14):2291, doi:10.3390/rs12142291.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pour Rahimian, F., Seyedzadeh, S., Oliver, S., Rodriguez, S., and Dawood, N. (2020). On-demand monitoring of construction projects through a game-like hybrid application of BIM and machine learning. Automation in Construction, 110:103012, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prieto, S. A., Garcia de Soto, B., and Adan, A. (2020). A methodology to monitor construction progress using autonomous robots. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), ISARC2020. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC), doi:10.22260/isarc2020/0210.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qu, T., Zang, W., Peng, Z., Liu, J., Li, W., Zhu, Y., Zhang, B., and Wang, Y. (2017). Construction site monitoring using UAV oblique photogrammetry and BIM technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), CAADRIA 2017. CAADRIA, doi:10.52842/conf.caadria.2017.655.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rabbi, J., Ray, N., Schubert, M., Chowdhury, S., and Chao, D. (2020). Small-object detection in remote sensing images with end-toend edge-enhanced GAN and object detector network. Remote Sensing, 12(9):1432, doi:10.3390/rs12091432.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rahmani, S., Strait, M., Merkurjev, D., Moeller, M., and Wittman, T. (2010). An adaptive IHS pan-sharpening method. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7(4):746–750, doi:10.1109/lgrs.2010.2046715.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saini, R. and Ghosh, S. K. (2018). Crop classification on single date Sentinel-2 imagery using random forest and suppor vector machine. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII–5:683–688, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-5-683-2018.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sentosa, G. A., Agung, R., Marbun, C. V., Kurniawan, W., Ibady, A. F., Pierre, A. J., Farell, Ambiarto, A. S., and Insyira, A. H. (2023). Construction progress monitoring on toll road project using photogrammetry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1169(1):012032, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1169/1/012032.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shafique, A., Cao, G., Khan, Z., Asad, M., and Aslam, M. (2022). Deep learning-based change detection in remote sensing images: A review. Remote Sensing, 14(4):871, doi:10.3390/rs14040871.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shahi, K., Shafri, H. Z., Taherzadeh, E., Mansor, S., and Muniandy, R. (2015). A novel spectral index to automatically extract road networks from WorldView-2 satellite imagery. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(1):27–33, doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.12.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sheik, N. A., Veelaert, P., and Deruyter, G. (2023). Exchanging progress information using IFC-based BIM for automated progress monitoring. Buildings, 13(9):2390, doi:10.3390/buildings13092390.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sulankivi, K. and Kiviniemi, M. (2014). 4D-BIM for construction safety planning. VTT Technical Research Center of Finland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tian, G., Meng, S., Bai, X., Liu, L., Zhi, Y., Zhao, B., and Meng, L. (2020). Research on monitoring and auxiliary audit strategy of transmission line construction progress based on satellite remote sensing and deep learning. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application (ITCA), pages 73–78. IEEE, doi:10.1109/itca52113.2020.00023.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tuttas, S., Braun, A., Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2014). Comparision of photogrammetric point clouds with bim building elements for construction progress monitoring. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL–3:341–345, doi:10.5194/isprsarchivesxl-3-341-2014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tuttas, S., Braun, A., Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2015). Validation of BIM components by photogrammetric point clouds for construction site monitoring. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W4:231–237, doi:10.5194/isprsannals-ii-3-w4-231-2015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tuttas, S., Braun, A., Borrmann, A., and Stilla, U. (2017). Acquisition and consecutive registration of photogrammetric point clouds for construction progress monitoring using a 4D-BIM. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, 85(1):3–15, doi:10.1007/s41064-016-0002-z.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Etten, A., Lindenbaum, D., and Bacastow, T. M. (2018). SpaceNet: A remote sensing dataset and challenge series. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1807.01232.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, J., Zheng, Z., Ma, A., Lu, X., and Zhong, Y. (2021). LoveDA: A remote sensing land-cover dataset for domain adaptive semantic segmentation. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2110.08733.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, T. H., Pal, A., Lin, J. J., and Hsieh, S.-H. (2023). Construction photo localization in 3D reality models for vision-based automated daily project monitoring. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 37(6), doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-5353.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wei, W., Lu, Y., Lin, Y., Bai, R., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., and Li, P. (2023). Augmenting progress monitoring in soil-foundation construction utilizing SOLOv2-based instance segmentation and visual BIM representation. Automation in Construction, 155:105048, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105048.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wei, W., Lu, Y., Zhong, T., Li, P., and Liu, B. (2022). Integrated vision-based automated progress monitoring of indoor construction using mask region-based convolutional neural networks and BIM. Automation in Construction, 140:104327, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104327.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie, Y., Sha, Z., and Yu, M. (2008). Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: A review. Journal of Plant Ecology, 1(1):9–23, doi:10.1093/jpe/rtm005.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xu, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, T., Yang, Z., and Li, J. (2021). Efficient transformer for remote sensing image segmentation. Remote Sensing, 13(18):3585, doi:10.3390/rs13183585.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xue, J. and Hou, X. (2022). High-rise building construction progress measurement from top view based on component detection. Buildings, 12(2):106, doi:10.3390/buildings12020106.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xue, J., Hou, X., and Zeng, Y. (2022). Rough registration of BIM element projection for construction progress tracking. IEEE Access, 10:8305–8316, doi:10.1109/access.2022.3144150.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, B., Gao, B., Han, Y., and Zhang, B. (2023). Semantic segmentation-based framework for concrete pouring progress monitoring by using multiple surveillance cameras. Developments in the Built Environment, 16:100283, doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100283.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, C. H., Pang, Y., and Soergel, U. (2017). Monitoring of building construction by 4D change detection using multi-temporal SAR images. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-1/W1:35–42, doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-1-w1-35-2017.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, L. and Gruen, A. (2006). Multi-image matching for DSM generation from IKONOS imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60(3):195–211, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.01.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, Y., Rossow, W. B., Lacis, A. A., Oinas, V., and Mishchenko, M. I. (2004). Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D19), doi:10.1029/2003jd004457.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao, W., Syafrudin, M., and Fitriyani, N. L. (2023a). CRAS-YOLO: A novel multi-category vessel detection and classification model based on YOLOv5s algorithm. IEEE Access, 11:11463–11478, doi:10.1109/access.2023.3241630.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao, X., Jin, Y., Selvaraj, N. M., Ilyas, M., and Cheah, C. C. (2023b). Platform-independent visual installation progress monitoring for construction automation. Automation in Construction, 154:104996, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104996.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu, L., Suomalainen, J., Liu, J., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H., and Haggren, H. (2018). A review: Remote sensing sensors. Multi-purposeful application of geospatial data, 19:19–42, doi:10.5772/intechopen.71049.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Sat4BIM4D — the concept of using satellite remote sensing to monitor construction progress in conjunction with BIM

Abstract

Paradigm

My account