Investigating diverse photogrammetric techniques in the hazard assessment of historical sites of the Museum of the Coal Basin Area in Będzin, Poland

Świerczyńska, Ewa; Karsznia, Krzysztof; Książek, Krzysztof; Odziemczyk, Waldemar

doi:10.2478/rgg-2024-0016

Abstract

Assessing the condition of historical sites at risk requires an interdisciplinary approach based on combining multiple measurement technologies. Due to the dynamic development of technology, non-invasive remote sensing methods are gaining significant importance. Among these techniques is photogrammetry based on images taken from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and those taken with a smartphone. In the study, the authors specified the possibilities and limitations of using remote photogrammetric methods to build accurate digital models of the walls of historic buildings with cracks in them. Point clouds, TIN grids, and façade orthophotos were examined. Statistical analysis was used to determine the repeatability of the data. Two parameters were identified that affect the accuracy of the data: the first – the direction of the segment between two points in the façade plane, and the second – the distance of the segment between two points in the plane of the façade. The study showed that the average accuracy of crack width measurements on the data acquired with the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise RTK is 1 mm. Testing of crack width measurements using a Samsung Galaxy S20 FE smartphone showed an average absolute error of 0.24 mm. Based on the results, it was concluded that the imagesacquired using mobile devices can be used to determine changes in crack widths on walls.

References

Baca, M., Muszyński, Z., Rybak, J., and Żyrek, T. (2015). The application of geodetic methods for displacement control in the self-balanced pile capacity testing instrument. In Advances and trends in engineering sciences and technologies: proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Sciences and Technologies, Tatranská Štrba, Slovakia, pages 15–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baltsavias, E. P. (1999). A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2–3):83–94, doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00014-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baselga, S., Garrigues, P., Berné, J. L., Anquela, A. B., and Martín, A. (2011). Deformation monitoring in historic buildings: A case study. Survey Review, 43(323):484–492, doi:10.1179/003962611x13117748891912.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bolognesi, M., Furini, A., Russo, V., Pellegrinelli, A., and Russo, P. (2014). Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL–5:113–119, doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-113-2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buill, F., Núñez-Andrés, M. A., Costa-Jover, A., Moreno, D., Puche, J. M., and Macias, J. M. (2020). Terrestrial Laser Scanner for the formal assessment of a Roman-Medieval structure – The cloister of the cathedral of Tarragona (Spain). Geosciences, 10(11):427, doi:10.3390/geosciences10110427.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Suchocki, C., Kozakiewicz, T., and Janicka, J. (2023). Measurement methodology for surface defects inventory of building wall using smartphone with light detection and ranging sensor. Measurement, 219:113286, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113286.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, M.-C., Wang, K., and Xie, L. (2013). Deterioration mechanism of cementitious materials under acid rain attack. Engineering Failure Analysis, 27:272–285, doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.08.007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Corradetti, A., Seers, T., Billi, A., and Tavani, S. (2021). Virtual outcrops in a pocket: The smartphone as a fully equipped photogrammetric data acquisition tool. GSA Today, 31(9):4–9, doi:10.1130/gsatg506a.1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Di Stefano, F., Cabrelles, M., García-Asenjo, L., Lerma, J. L., Malinverni, E. S., Baselga, S., Garrigues, P., and Pierdicca, R. (2020). Evaluation of long-range mobile mapping system (MMS) and close-range photogrammetry for deformation monitoring. A case study of Cortes de Pallás in Valencia (Spain). Applied Sciences, 10(19):6831, doi:10.3390/app10196831.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fawzy, H. E.-D. (2019). Study the accuracy of digital close range photogrammetry technique software as a measuring tool. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1):171–179, doi:10.1016/j.aej.2018.04.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gairns, C. (2008). Development of a semi-automated system for structural deformation monitoring using a reflectorless total station. Master’s thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gollob, C., Ritter, T., Kraßnitzer, R., Tockner, A., and Nothdurft, A. (2021). Measurement of forest inventory parameters with Apple iPad Pro and integrated LiDAR technology. Remote Sensing, 13(16):3129, doi:10.3390/rs13163129.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaud, M., Kervot, M., Delacourt, C., and Bertin, S. (2019). Potential of smartphone SfM photogrammetry to measure coastal morpho-dynamics. Remote Sensing, 11(19):2242, doi:10.3390/rs11192242.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jigyasu, R. (2005). Towards developing methodology for integrated risk management of cultural heritage sites and their settings. In 15th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: “Monuments and sites in their setting – conserving cultural heritage in changing townscapes and landscapes”, 17–21.10.2005, Xi’an, China.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karsznia, K. (2023). Innowacyjny system geomonitoringu do badania deformacji elementów powierzchniowych – IMS GEO (Innovative geomonitoring system for studying surface element deformations – IMS GEO). PRZEGLĄD GEODEZYJNY, 1(8):22–26, doi:10.15199/50.2023.08.3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karsznia, K. (2024). Wykorzystanie wieloźródłowych danych przestrzennych do oceny stanu obiektów zabytkowych na terenach zagrożonych (using multi-source spatial data to assess the condition of historic buildings in endangered areas). PRZEGLĄD GEODEZYJNY, 1(2):38–42, doi:10.15199/50.2024.2.5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lohani, B. and Ghosh, S. (2017). Airborne lidar technology: A review of data collection and processing systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 87(4):567–579, doi:10.1007/s40010-017-0435-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Markiewicz, J., Tobiasz, A., Kot, P., Muradov, M., Shaw, A., and Al-Shammaa, A. (2019). Review of surveying devices for structural health monitoring of cultural heritage buildings. In 2019 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE). IEEE, doi:10.1109/dese.2019.00113.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murtiyoso, A. and Grussenmeyer, P. (2017). Documentation of heritage buildings using close-range UAV images: dense matching issues, comparison and case studies. The Photogrammetric Record, 32(159):206–229, doi:10.1111/phor.12197.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Museum of the Coal Basin (2024). Museum of the Coal Basin in Będzin. https://www.muzeumzaglebia.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ornoch, L., Popielski, P., Olszewski, A., and Kasprzak, A. (2021). Ultrasonic sensors enabling early detection of emergency trends and analysis of structure inclination and stability by means of highly accurate level measurements. Sensors, 21(5):1789, doi:10.3390/s21051789.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pearson, K. (1896). VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution – III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, containing papers of a mathematical or physical character, (187):253–318.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PGI (2024). Polish Geological Institute. https://geologia.pgi.gov.pl/arcgis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Piotrowski, J. and Kostyrko, K. (2012). Wzorcowanie aparatury pomiarowej (Calibration of measuring equipment). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pix4D (2023). How can you know whether to use a drone or a terrestrial rover – the viDoc? One team compared the results of both to test the accuracy. https://www.pix4d.com/blog/comparing-vidoc-rtk-rover-p1-camera.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge university press New York, NY.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sapirstein, P. (2016). Accurate measurement with photogrammetry at large sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66:137–145, doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shevchenko, G. G., Bryn, M. J., Afonin, D. A., and Gura, D. A. (2020). Experimental Researches in Defining Deformations by Free Station Method and Results Processing by Search Method, pages 163–175. Springer Singapore, doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0454-9_17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stec, K. (2007). Seismic hazard state in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin. Research Reports Mining and Environment, Quarterly, (3):55–75.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Świerczyńska, E., Karsznia, K., Książek, K., Odziemczyk, W.,, and Smaczyński, M. (2023). Assessing the technical state of historical buildings using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and close-range aerial photogrammetry. In XVI International Scientific and Technical Conference entitled “Current Problems in Engineering Geodesy – Engineering Geodesy for the Development of a Sustainable Economy,” Poznań-Baranowo, 21–23.09.2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Taylor, J. R. (1999). Wstęp do analizy błędu pomiarowego (Introduction to measurement error analysis).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teppati Losè, L., Spreafico, A., Chiabrando, F., and Giulio Tonolo, F. (2022). Apple LiDAR sensor for 3D surveying: Tests and results in the cultural heritage domain. Remote Sensing, 14(17):4157, doi:10.3390/rs14174157.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woźniak, M. (2009). Bezreflektorowe systemy pomiarowe w monitorowaniu przemieszczeń (Reflectorless measurement systems for displacement monitoring). Technical Report 443, Instytut Techniki Budowlanej. Bezdotykowe metody obserwacji i pomiarów obiektów budowlanych. Instrukcje, wytyczne, poradniki.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woźniak, M. and Woźniak, K. (2020). MarQR technology for measuring relative displacements of building structure elements with regard to joints and cracks. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 109(1):33–40, doi:10.2478/rgg-2020-0005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woźniak, M., Świerczyńska, E., and Jastrzębski, S. (2015). The use of video-tacheometric technology for documenting and analysing geometric features of objects. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 99(1):28–43, doi:10.2478/rgg-2015-0010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie, S., Qi, L., and Zhou, D. (2004). Investigation of the effects of acid rain on the deterioration of cement concrete using accelerated tests established in laboratory. Atmospheric Environment, 38(27):4457–4466, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zaczek-Peplinska, J. (2023). Pomiary inwetaryzacyjne z wykorzystaniem apple iphone 13 pro i zintegrowanej technologii lidar (Inventory measurements using Apple iPhone 13 Pro and integrated LiDAR technology). PRZEGLĄD GEODEZYJNY, 1(2):16–19, doi:10.15199/50.2023.02.1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Investigating diverse photogrammetric techniques in the hazard assessment of historical sites of the Museum of the Coal Basin Area in Będzin, Poland

Abstract

Paradigm

My account