Abstract
The article presents an analysis of the effectiveness of selected machine learning methods: Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) in the classification of land use and cover in satellite images. Several variants of each algorithm were tested, adopting different parameters typical for each of them. Each variant was classified multiple (20) times, using training samples of different sizes: from 100 pixels to 200,000 pixels. The tests were conducted independently on 3 Sentinel-2 satellite images, identifying 5 basic land cover classes: built-up areas, soil, forest, water, and low vegetation. Typical metrics were used for the accuracy assessment: Cohen’s kappa coefficient, overall accuracy (for whole images), as well as F-1 score, precision, and recall (for individual classes). The results obtained for different images were consistent and clearly indicated an increase in classification accuracy with the increase in the size of the training sample. They also showed that among the tested algorithms, the XGB algorithm is the most sensitive to the size of the training sample, while the least sensitive is SVM, which achieved relatively good results even when using training samples of the smallest sizes. At the same time, it was pointed out that while in the case of RF and XGB algorithms the differences between the tested variants were slight, the effectiveness of SVM was very much dependent on the gamma parameter – with too high values of this parameter, the model showed a tendency to overfit, which did not allow for satisfactory results.