Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Validity of Weak-Form Market Efficiency in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests Cover

Validity of Weak-Form Market Efficiency in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. ABRAHAM, A., FAZAL, J., SULAIMAN, A. (2002). Testing the random walk behavior and efficiency of the Gulf stock markets. The Financial Review, 37, 469-480. DOI: 10.1111/0732-8516.0000810.1111/0732-8516.00008
  2. ALEXEEV, V., TAPON, F. (2011). Testing weak-form efficiency on the Toronto stock exchange. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 661-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.00210.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.002
  3. AL-LOUGHANI, N., CHAPPELL, D. (1997). On the validity of the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis applied to the London stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2), 173-176. DOI: 10.1080/09603109733373610.1080/096031097333736
  4. ALOM, K., RAQUIB, M. (2014). Capital market efficiency and portfolio equity inflows in Bangladesh. World Vision Research Journal, 8(1), 202-215.
  5. ANANZEH, I. E. N. (2014). Testing the weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Jordan. International Business and Management, 9(2), 119-123. DOI: 10.3968/552410.3968/5524
  6. ANANZEH, I.E.N. (2016). Weak-form efficiency of the Amman stock exchange: An empirical analysis (2000-2013). International Journal of Business and Management, 11(1), 173-180. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v11n1p17310.5539/ijbm.v11n1p173
  7. ANLAS, T., TORAMAN, C. (2016). Analysing the efficiency of the Turkish stock market with multiple structural breaks. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 721-740. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/253110.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/2531
  8. ANORUO, E., MURTHY, V.N.R. (2014). Testing nonlinear inflation convergence for the central African economic and monetary community. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 1-7.
  9. ATAKAN, T. (2008). Testing the day-of-the-week effect and January effect anomalies at Istanbul stock exchange with arch-garch models. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 37(2), 98-110.
  10. ATAN, S.D., OZDEMIR, Z.A., ATAN, M. (2009). Weak efficiency on the stock exchange market: An empirical study on ISE. Dokuz Eylul University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(2), 33-48.
  11. BASHIR, T., ILYAS, M., FURRUKH, A. (2011). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Pakistani stock markets: An empirical study in banking sector. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 31, 160-175.
  12. BORGES, M.R. (2010). Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, 16(7), 711-726. DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2010.49547710.1080/1351847X.2010.495477
  13. BOZKURT, C., OKUMUS, I. (2016). Are fluctuations in oil consumption permanent or transitory? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root test in BRICS-T countries. Cukurova University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 27-37.
  14. BROOKS, C. (2014). Modelling long-run relationships in finance. In: Introductory Econometrics for Finance (3rd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. BUGUK, C., BRORSEN, B.W. (2003). Testing weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from ISE. International Review of Financial Analysis, 12(5): 579-590. DOI: 10.1016/S1057-5219(03)00065-610.1016/S1057-5219(03)00065-6
  16. CELIK, T.T., TAS, O. (2007). Efficient market hypothesis and emerging markets. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi, Sosyal Bilimler, 4(2), 11-22.
  17. CHAN, K.C., GUP, B.E., PAN, M.S. (1997). International stock market efficiency and integration: A study of eighteen nations. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(6), 803-813. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.0013410.1111/1468-5957.00134
  18. CHAUDHURI, K., WU, Y. (2003). Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 575-592. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00252-7.10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00252-7
  19. CHOUDHRY, T. (1997) Stochastic trends in stock prices: Evidence from Latin American markets. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19(2), 285-304. DOI: 10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00016-510.1016/S0164-0704(97)00016-5
  20. CHUVAKHIN, N. (2001). Efficient market hypothesis and behavioral finance is a compromise in sight. Available at http://ncbase.com/papers/EMH-BF.pdf
  21. CONKAR, M.K, CANBAZ, M.F., ARIFOGLU, A. (2018). Causality relationship between the credits of commercial and Islamic banks and economic growth: An econometric analysis. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.5578/jeas.61920.10.5578/jeas.61920
  22. ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T.J., STOCK, J.H. (1996). Efficient test for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836. DOI: 10.2307/217184610.2307/2171846
  23. EZEPUE, P.O., OMAR, M.T. (2012). Weak-form market efficiency of the Nigerian stock market in the context of financial reforms and global financial crises. Journal of African Business, 13(3), 209-220. DOI: 10.1080/15228916.2012.727750.10.1080/15228916.2012.727750
  24. DRAGOTA, V., TILICA, E. (2014). Market efficiency of the post-communist east european stock markets. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 22(2), 307-337. DOI: 10.1007/s10100-013-0315-610.1007/s10100-013-0315-6
  25. FAMA, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105. DOI: 10.1086/29474310.1086/294743
  26. FAMA, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical works. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: 10.2307/232548610.2307/2325486
  27. FAMA, E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, V.XLVI(5), 1575-1576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
  28. GEMICI, E., POLAT, M. (2018). Random walk hypothesis in MIST stock markets. Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 129-142.10.17153/oguiibf.344882
  29. GILANI, R.T.S., NAWAZ, M., SHAKOOR, M. I., ASAB, M. Z. (2015). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Islamabad stock exchange. Developing Country Studies, 4(11), 79-86.10.18034/gdeb.v4i2.137
  30. GOURISHANKAR, S.H., SADATH, A., KAMAIAH, B. (2009). On the random walk characteristics of stock returns in India. Artha Vijnana, 51(1), 85-96.10.21648/arthavij/2009/v51/i1/115429
  31. GOZBASI, O. (2014). Testing weak-form efficiency of the Borsa Istanbul stock market: a nonlinear approach. Verimlilik Dergisi, 0(4), 7-18.
  32. GOZBASI, O., KUÇUKKAPLAN, I. NAZLIOGLU, S. (2014). Re-examining the Turkish stock market efficiency: Evidence from nonlinear unit root tests, Economic Modelling, 38, 381-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.021.10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.021
  33. GUMUS, F.B., ZEREN, F. (2014). Analyzing the efficient market hypothesis with the fourier unit root tests: Evidence from G-20 countries. Ekonomski Horizonti, 16(3), 225-237. DOI: 10.5937/ekonhor1403225g10.5937/ekonhor1403225g
  34. HAQUE, A., LIU, H-C., NISA, F-U. (2011). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Pakistani stock market (2000–2010). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(4), 153-162.
  35. HARRIS, D., MCCABE, B.P., LEYBOURNE, S.J. (2003). Same limit theory for auto-covariances whose order depends on sample size. Econometric Theory, 10, 829-864.10.1017/S0266466603195060
  36. HARVEY, D.I., LEYBOURNE, S.J. (2007). Testing for time series linearity. Econometrics Journal, 10(1), 149-165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00203.x10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00203.x
  37. HARVEY, D.I., LEYBOURNE, S.J., XIAO, B. (2008). A powerful test for linearity when the order of integration is unknown. Studies Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(3), 1-24. DOI: 10.2202/1558-3708.158210.2202/1558-3708.1582
  38. HASANOV, M., OMAY, T. (2007). Are the transition stock markets efficient? Evidence from non-linear unit root tests. Central Bank Review, 2(2007), 1-12.
  39. HEPSAG, A., AKCALI, B.Y. (2015). The analysis of weak-form efficiency with asymmetric nonlinear unit root test: The case of G-7 and E-7 countries. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 9(2), 73-90.
  40. HOOI, L., SMYTH, R. (2007). Are Asian real exchange rates mean reverting? Evidence from univariate and panel LM unit root tests with one and two structural breaks. Applied Economics, 39, 2109-2120. DOI: 10.1080/0003684060072233110.1080/00036840600722331
  41. HUSSAIN, S., NATH, S.K.D., BHUIYAN, Y.A. (2016). Weak-form efficiency of the Chittagong stock exchange: An empirical analysis (2006-2016). International Journal of Business and Social Research, 6(11), 58-66. DOI: 10.18533/ijbsr.v6i11.1015.10.18533/ijbsr.v6i11.1015
  42. ILALAN, D. (2018). An empirical study of BIST 100 index with nonlinear unit root testing. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 14(3), 656-665.10.17130/ijmeb.2018343116
  43. IRFAN, M., MARIA, I., MUHAMMAD, A. (2010). Investigating the weak-form efficiency of an emerging market using parametric tests: Evidence from Karachi stock market of Pakistan. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 3(1), 52-64.
  44. KAPETANIOS, G., SHIN, Y., SNELL, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359-379. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-610.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6
  45. KARAN, M.B. (2004). Yatırım analizi ve portföy yönetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  46. KAWAKATSU, H., MOREY, M.R. (1999). Financial liberalization and stock market efficiency: An empirical examination of nine emerging market countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 9(3-4), 353-371. DOI: 10.1016/S1042-444X(99)00007-910.1016/S1042-444X(99)00007-9
  47. KHAN, N.U, KHAN, S. (2016). Weak-form of efficient market hypothesis evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 8, 1-18.10.22547/BER/8.SE.1
  48. KIM, J.H., SHAMSUDDIN, A., LIM, K.P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(5), 868-879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.00210.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.002
  49. KIM, S-W., MOLLICK, A.V., NAM, K. (2008). Common nonlinearities in long-horizon stock returns: Evidence from the G-7 stock markets, Global Finance Journal, 19(1), 19-31.10.1016/j.gfj.2007.09.002
  50. KIYILAR, M. (1997). Etkin pazar kuramı ve ektin pazar kuramının IMKB’de irdelenmesi ve test edilmesi. Ankara: Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, No. 86.
  51. KIYILAR, M. (1998). Etkin pazar kuramının test edilmesi. Yönetim, 9(29), 34-51.
  52. KOFARBAI, H.Z., ZUBAIRU, M. (2016). Efficient market hypothesis in emerging market-a conceptual analysis. European Scientific Journal, 12(25), 260-270. DOI: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p26010.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p260
  53. KRUSE, R. (2011). A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistic Papers, 52(1), 71-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00362-009-0204-110.1007/s00362-009-0204-1
  54. LEAN, H.H., SMYTH, R. (2007). Do Asian stock markets follow a random walk? Evidence from LM unit root tests with one and two structural breaks. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 10, 15-31. DOI: 10.1142/S021909150700093310.1142/S0219091507000933
  55. LEE, C., LEE, J., LEE, C. (2010). Stock prices and the efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from a panel stationary test with structural breaks. Japan and the World Economy, 22(1), 49-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2009.04.00210.1016/j.japwor.2009.04.002
  56. LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M.C. (2003). Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. DOI: 10.1162/00346530377281596110.1162/003465303772815961
  57. LEE, C., TSONG, C., LEE, C. (2014). Testing for the efficient market hypothesis in stock prices: International evidence from nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18(4), 943-958. DOI: 10.1017/S136510051200069710.1017/S1365100512000697
  58. LI, W.K., LAM, K. (1995). Modelling asymmetry in stock returns by a threshold autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 44(3), 333-341.10.2307/2348704
  59. LIU, T. (2010). Stock Market Development and Market Efficiency on China Stock Market. Euro Journals Publishing, Inc.
  60. LO, A.W., MACKINLAY, A.C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41-66. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/1.1.4110.1093/rfs/1.1.41
  61. MANASSEH, C.O., OZUZU, C.K., OGBUABOR, J.E. (2016). Semi strong form efficiency test of the Nigerian stock market: Evidence from event study analysis of bonus issues. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1474-1490.
  62. MALCIOGLU, G., AYDIN, M. (2016). Analysis of market efficiency at Borsa Istanbul: Harvey linearity test. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(1), 112-123.
  63. MALHOTRA, N., TANDON, K., TANDON, D. (2015). Testing the empirics of weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from Asia-Pacific markets. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 21(4), 18-37.
  64. MCMILLAN, D.G. (2005). Non-linear dynamics in international stock market returns. Review of Financial Economics, 14 (1), 81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2004.09.00110.1016/j.rfe.2004.09.001
  65. MEHMOOD, M.S., MEHMOOD, A., MUJTABA, B.G. (2012). Stock market prices follow the random walks: Evidence from the efficiency of Karachi stock exchange. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative, 51, 71-80.
  66. MISHRA, P.K. (2011). Weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from emerging and developed world. The Journal of Commerce, 3(2), 26-34.
  67. MOLLAH, A.S. (2007). Testing weak-form market efficiency in emerging market: Evidence from Botswana stock exchange. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 10(6), 1077-1094. DOI: 10.1142/S021902490700455X10.1142/S021902490700455X
  68. MUNIR, Q., MANSUR, K. (2009). Is Malaysian stock market efficient? Evidence from threshold unit root tests. Economics Bulletin, 29(2), 1359-1370.
  69. NARAYAN, P.K. (2005) Are the Australian and New Zealand stock prices nonlinear with a unit root?. Applied Economics, 37(18), 2161-2166. DOI: 10.1080/0003684050021788710.1080/00036840500217887
  70. NARAYAN, P.K. (2006). The behaviour of US stock prices: Evidence from a threshold autoregressive model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 71(2), 103-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.11.01610.1016/j.matcom.2005.11.016
  71. NARAYAN, P.K. (2008). Do shocks to G7 stock prices have a permanent effect? Evidence from panel unit root tests with structural change. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77(4), 369-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2007.03.00310.1016/j.matcom.2007.03.003
  72. NARAYAN, P., PRASAD, A. (2007). Mean reversion in stock prices: New evidence from panel unit root tests for seventeen European countries. Economics Bulletin, 3, 1-16.10.1108/10867370710817419
  73. NARAYAN, P.K., SMYTH, R. (2004). Is South Korea's stock market efficient?. Applied Economics Letters, 11(1), 707-710. DOI: 10.1080/135048504200023656610.1080/1350485042000236566
  74. NARAYAN, P.K., SMYTH, R. (2007). Mean reversion versus random walk in G-7 stock prices evidence from multiple trend break unit root tests. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 17(2017), 152-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2005.10.00210.1016/j.intfin.2005.10.002
  75. NISAR, S., HANIF, M. (2012). Testing weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from South-Asia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(4), 414-427.
  76. NOVICKYTE, L., DEGUTIS, A. (2014). The efficient market hypothesis: A critical review of literature and methodology. Ekonomika, 93(2), 7-23. DOI: 10.15388/Ekon.2014.2.354910.15388/Ekon.2014.2.3549
  77. NWACHUKWU, J.C., SHITTA, O. (2015). Testing the weak-form efficiency of stock markets: A comparative study of emerging and industrialised economies. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(3), 409-426. DOI: 10.1108/IJoEM-07-2013-011510.1108/IJoEM-07-2013-0115
  78. OZDEMIR, Z.A. (2008). Efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from a small open-economy. Applied Economics, 40 (5), 633-641. DOI: 10.1080/0003684060072231510.1080/00036840600722315
  79. PELE, D.T., VOINEAGU, V. (2008). Testing market efficiency via decomposition of stock return: Application to Romanian capital market. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 5(3), 63-79.
  80. PERVEZ, M., RASHID, H.U., CHOWDHURY, A.I., RAHAMAN, M. (2018). Predicting the stock market efficiency in weak-form: A study on Dhaka stock exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 88-95.
  81. PHILLIPS P.C.B., PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.33510.1093/biomet/75.2.335
  82. PHIRI, A. (2015). Efficient market hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests. Managing Global Transitions, 13(4), 369-387.
  83. RAHMAN, M.S., SIMON, H.M., HOSSAIN, M.M. (2016). An empirical analysis of weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from Chittagong stock exchange (CSE) of Bangladesh. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 5(3), 535-542. DOI: 10.18576/jsap/05031710.18576/jsap/050317
  84. RYALY, V.R., KUMAR, K.K., URLANKULA, B. (2014). A study on weak-form of market efficiency in selected Asian stock markets. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(11), 34-43. DOI: 10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i11/7184210.17010/ijf/2014/v8i11/71842
  85. SAID, A., HARPER, A. (2015). The efficiency of the Russian stock market: A revisit of the random walk hypothesis. Academy of Accounting and Finance Studies Journal, 19(1), 42-48.
  86. SAKARYA, S., ZEREN, F., AKKUS, H. T. (2018). Testing the weak form market efficiency in participation indices: An application on Turkey. AKU Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 101-11310.5578/jeas.67163
  87. SAMUELSON, P. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, Spring 6, 41-49.
  88. SARIKAMIS, C. (2000). Sermaye pazarları. Istanbul: Alfa Yayinlari, Genisletilmis 4. Baskı.
  89. SMITH, G., RYOO, H-J. (2003). Variance ratio tests of the random walk hypothesis for European emerging stock markets. European Journal of Finance, 9(3), 290-300. DOI: 10.1080/135184702100002577710.1080/1351847021000025777
  90. TARI, R. (2014). Ekonometri, Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayinlari.
  91. TOKIĆ, S., BOLFEK, B., PEŠA, A. R. (2018). Testing efficient market hypothesis in developing eastern european countries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(2), 281-291. DOI: 10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.2510.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.25
  92. WORTHINGTON, A., HIGGS, H. (2004). Random walks and market efficiency in European equity markets. Global Journal of Finance and Economics, 1(1), 59-78.
  93. WORTHINGTON, A., HIGGS, H. (2006). Weak-form market efficiency in Asian emerging and developed equity markets: Comparative tests of random walk behavior. Accounting Research Journal, 19(1), 54-63.
  94. VASCONCELOS, C.B.F., JUNIOR, L.A.L. (2016). Validity of purchasing power parity for selected Latin American countries: Linear and non-linear unit root tests. EconomiA, 17(1), 114-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2015.11.00110.1016/j.econ.2015.11.001
  95. YANG, G.J-A., LEE, C., LEE, C-H. (2015). Random walk in the MIST. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 16(2), 92-104. DOI: 10.1080/10599231.2015.102830310.1080/10599231.2015.1028303
  96. YARTEY, C., ADJASI, C.K. (2007). Stock market development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Critical issue and challenges. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 07/209.10.2139/ssrn.1012992
  97. YUCEL, O. (2016). Financial market efficiency: A study on Borsa Istanbul. International Review of Economics and Management, 4(3), 107-123.
  98. ZAUBIA, K., ALNAHLEH, M. (2010). Financial markets efficiency: Empirical evidence from some Middle East & North Africa countries (MENA). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 49, 180-193.
  99. ZEREN, F., KONUK, F. (2013). Testing the random walk hypothesis for emerging markets: Evidence from linear and non-linear unit root tests. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 8(4), 61-71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2019-0020 | Journal eISSN: 1804-1663 | Journal ISSN: 1213-2446
Language: English
Page range: 399 - 428
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 26, 2019
Published on: Dec 21, 2019
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Mehmet Levent Erdas, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.