Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Use of TOPSIS Method for Assessing of Good Governance in European Union Countries

By:
Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. ABDELATIFF, A.M. (2003). Good Governance and its relationship to democracy and economic development, [online]. 2003 [cit. 2019-07-22]. Available at: ftp://pogar.org/LocalUser/pogarp/governance/aa/goodgov.pdf
  2. ACEMOGLU, D., ROBINSON, J. (2010). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Power. New York: Crown Business.
  3. AGERE, S. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives, Managing the Public Service: Strategies for Improvement, No. 11, [online]. Commonwealth Secretariat, London. 2000 [cit. 2019-06-02]. DOI: 10.14217/9781848597129-en10.14217/9781848597129-en
  4. ANDREWS, M. (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 379–423. DOI: 10.1080/1360081080245512010.1080/13600810802455120
  5. ARDIELLI, E. (2016). Implementation of Good Governance Concept in the European Union Member Countries. In ICEI 2016. Ostrava: VŠB-TUO, pp. 28-36.
  6. ARDIELLI, E., HALÁSKOVÁ, M. (2015a). Evaluation of Good Governance in EU countries. Acta academica karviniensia. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 5-17. DOI: 10.25142/aak.2015.02710.25142/aak.2015.027
  7. ARDIELLI, E., HALÁSKOVÁ, M. (2015b). Assessment of E-government in EU countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 4-16.
  8. BHUTIA, P. W., PHIPON, R. (2012) Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem, Journal of Engineering, Vol. 2., No. 10, pp. 43-50.10.9790/3021-021034350
  9. CHARRON, N., DIJKSTRA, L. and V. LAPUENTE. (2015). Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 315-346. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
  10. CLAGUE, C. et al. (1999). Contract-intensive money: Contract enforcement, property rights, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 185-211. DOI: 10.1023/A:100985440518410.1023/A:1009854405184
  11. COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 2007. Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration. [online]. 2015 [cit. 2019-02-22] Available at: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1155877.
  12. COURT, J., HYDEN, G. (2003). World Governance Survey: a New Approach to Assessing Governance. Global Corruption Report 2003. [online]. 2003. [cit. 2019-02-12]. Available at: http://publication.fsv.cuni.cz/attachments/121_018_Nekola.pdf.
  13. DINCER, S. E. (2011). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Economic Activity for European Union Member States and Candidate Countries: TOPSIS and WSA Applications. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 563-572.
  14. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2018). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28 [online]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 [cit. 2019-08-08]. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e89d981-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
  15. EWALDT, J.A.G. 2001. Theories of Governance and New Public Management. [online]. 2001 [cit. 2019-07-06]. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ASPA/UNPAN000563.pdf
  16. FIALA, P. (2008). Modely a metody rozhodování. Praha: Oeconomica.
  17. GRINDLE, M.S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and freeform in developing countries. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol. 17, pp. 525–548. DOI: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  18. GRINDLE, M.S. (2007). Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 553-574. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x
  19. HALDENWANG, C.V. (2004). Electronic government (E-Government) and development. The European Journal of Development Research. Vol.16, pp. 417–432.10.1080/0957881042000220886
  20. JANN, W., RÖBER, M, and H. WOLLMANN. (2006). Public management – Grundlagen, Wirkungen, Kritik. Berlin: Sigma.10.5771/9783845267753
  21. JONES, L.R., KETTL, D.F. (2003). Assessing public financial management reform in international context. International Public Management Review, Vol.4, pp. 1–16.
  22. KAUFMANN, D., KRAAY, A. and M. MASTRUZZI. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues [online]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, 2010 [cit. 2019-07-06]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130
  23. KEPING, Y. F. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 11, No.1. pp. 1–8.10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
  24. KLENK, T., NULLMEIER, F. (2004). Public Governance als Reforms Strategie. Düsseldorf: Edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
  25. KLIMOVSKÝ, D. (2010). Genéza koncepcie good governance a jej kritické prehodnotenie v teoretickej perspektíve. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics. Vol. 58, No.2, pp. 188-205.
  26. KOOIMAN, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446215012
  27. KUNCOVÁ, M. (2012). Elektronické obchodování - srovnání zemí EU v letech 2008-2009 s využitím metod vícekriteriálního hodnocení variant. In: IRCINGOVÁ, J., TLUČHOŘ, J., Trendy v podnikání 2012. Plzeň: ZČU, pp. 1–9.
  28. LADI, S., RUSO-DRAGOUMIS, E. (2007). Study on Institutional Renewal and Good Governance in BSEC Member States. Athens: International Centre for Black Sea Studies.
  29. MADZOVA, V., SAJNOSKI, K. and L. DAVCEV. (2013). E-Government as an Efficient Tool towards Good Governance. Balkan Social Science Review. Vol. 1, pp. 157-174.
  30. NORTH, C. D. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  31. POTŮČEK, M. et al. (2007). Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. Praha: Grada, a.s.
  32. POTĚŠIL, L. (2008). Good Administration in Scope of the Council of Europe. Veřejná správa. Vol. 12, pp. VII - VIII.
  33. PILLAY, P. (2016). The relationship between public administration and good governance: the case of South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 1, pp 18-31.
  34. ROSZKOWSKA, E. (2011). Multi-criteria Decision Making Models by Applying the Topsis Method to Crisp and Interval Data. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Vol. 6, pp. 200-230.
  35. SHIH, H., SHYUR, H. and E.S. LEE. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 45, No. 7-8, pp. 801-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.02310.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
  36. SUNDARAM, J. K. (2018). Does good governance always boost development? [online]. World Economic Forum. 2018. [cit. 2018-08-08]. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/does-good-governance-always-boost-development/
  37. ŠUBRT, T. et al. (2015). Ekonomicko-matematické metody. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, s.r.o.
  38. UNPACS. (2018). Data Center - Government Development Index. [online]. 2018. [cit. 2018-10-02]. Available at: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center.
  39. WORLD BANK. (1992). Governance and development (English). Washington, DC : The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-2094-7
  40. WORLD BANK. (2018). Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online]. 2018. [cit. 2018-18-10]. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#doc
  41. YOON, K. P., HWANG, CH. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. California: Sage.10.4135/9781412985161
  42. ZANGER, S. C. (2000). Good Governance and European Aid the Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics. Vol. 1, No.3, pp. 293-317. DOI: 10.1177/146511650000100300210.1177/1465116500001003002
  43. ŽÁK, M. (2005). Kvalita správy: hodnocení a měření [online]. 2005 [cit. 2018-11-12]. Available at: https://www.vsem.cz/data/data/ces-soubory/working-paper/gf_WPNo13.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2019-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1804-1663 | Journal ISSN: 1213-2446
Language: English
Page range: 211 - 231
Submitted on: Mar 29, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 16, 2019
Published on: Sep 19, 2019
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2019 Eva Ardielli, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.