Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What is the Contribution of the Theory of Redistribution Systems to the Theory of Corruption? Cover

What is the Contribution of the Theory of Redistribution Systems to the Theory of Corruption?

Review of Economic Perspectives
Volume 13 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)
By: Tomáš Otáhal,  Milan Palát and  Petr Wawrosz  
Open Access
|Jul 2013

References

  1. ACKERMAN, S. R. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, andReform. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139175098
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. BARDHAN, P. (1997). Corruption and Development: a review of issues. Journal ofEconomic Literature. 35(3), pp. 1320-1346.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. BENSON, B. L., BADEN, J. (1985). The Political Economy of Governmental Corruption: The Logic of Underground Government. Journal of Legal Studies. 14(2), pp. 391-410.10.1086/467777
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BUCHANAN, J. M. (1979). Is Economics the Science of Choice? In What ShouldEconomist Do? Indianapolis (IN): Liberty Fund.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. COLOMBATTO, E. (2003). Why is corruption tolerated? Review of AustrianEconomics. 16(4), pp. 367-379.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. FURUBOTN, E. G., RICHTER, R. (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory. 2nd Edition. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.6715
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. GROCHOVÁ, L., OTÁHAL, T. (2011). Corruption in the Czech and the Slovak Republics: Did the EU Pressure Improve Legal Framework and Its Enforcement? ActaUniversitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensi. 14(7), pp. 1-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. GROCHOVÁ, L., OTÁHAL, T. (2010). Podnikání a ekonomický rozvoj: jaký je rozdíl mezi neo-Rakouskou a novou institucionální ekonomií? Politická ekonomie. 58(5), pp. 623-640.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. JAJUGA, K. et al. (2002). Classification, Clustering and Data Analysis: RecentAdvances and Application. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56181-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. JENSEN, M. C., MECKLING, W. H. (1974). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 4(2), pp. 305-360.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. KOHN, M. (2004). Value and Exchange. CATO Journal. 24(3), pp. 303-339.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. KUHN, P., RIDDELL, CH. (2010). The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 63(2), pp. 183-204.10.1177/001979391006300201
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. LAMBSDORF, J. G. (2002). Corruption and rent-seeking. Public Choice. 113(1-2), pp. 97-125.10.1023/A:1020320327526
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. LAMBSDORFF, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform:theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511492617
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. MIESES, L. (1949). Human action: a treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. MUSGRAVE, R. (2004). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. Noida: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. NYE, J.S. (1967). Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. American Political Science Review. 61(2), pp. 417-427.10.2307/1953254
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. OKUN, A. M. (1975). Equality and Efficiency - The Big Tradeoff. Brookings Institution Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. OTÁHAL, T. (2006). Ekonomická analýza definice korupce. Národohospodářský obzor. 4(1), pp. 50-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. OTÁHAL, T. (2007a). Corruption: A Theoretical Note. In Proceedings of International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers. Zlín: TBU in Zlín.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. OTÁHAL, T. (2007b). Why is Corruption a Problem of the State? Prague EconomicPapers. 7(2), pp. 165- 179.10.18267/j.pep.304
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. OTÁHAL, T. (2008a). Na obranu dobývání renty. Ekonomický časopis. 56(10), pp. 1019-1032.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. OTÁHAL, T. (2008b). Teorie podnikatelského objevování. Politická ekonomie. 56(5), pp. 669-683.10.18267/j.polek.658
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. OTÁHAL, T. (2009a). Korupce ve spontánním řádu. Scientia et Societas. 5(1), pp. 137-148.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. OTÁHAL, T. (2009b). Problém zastoupení v nové institucionální ekonomii. Politickáekonomie. 57(5), pp. 677-695.10.18267/j.polek.704
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. OTÁHAL, T. (2010). Srovnání teorií korupce. Scientia et Societas. 6(3), pp. 143-158.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. PALÁT, M. (2009). Analýza trhu práce v České republice s důrazem na nezaměstnanost vzhledem k dalším zemím Evropské unie. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae etSilviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 57(6), pp. 189-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. PERLOFF, J. M. (2008). Microeconomics: theory & applications with calculus. London: Pearson/Addison-Wesley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. POTŮČEK, M. (1997). Nejen trh. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. RIZZO, M. J. (1979) Uncertainty, Subjectivity, and the Economic Analysis of Law. In RIZZO, M (Eds.), Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium: Exploration of AustrianThemes. Massachusetts Toronto: Lexington Books D.C.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. SPECTOR, B. I. (2005). Fighting Corruption in Developing Countries: Strategies andAnalysis. Sterling: Kumarian Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. STIGLITZ, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. New York USA: W. W. Norton & Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. TOLLISON, R. D. (1982). Rent Seeking: A Survey. Kyklos. 35(4), pp. 576-602.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00174.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. TREISMAN, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal ofPublic Economics. 76(3), pp. 399-457.10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. TULLOCK, G. (1996). Corruption Theory and Practice. Contemporary EconomicPolicy. 14(3), pp. 6- 13.10.1111/j.1465-7287.1996.tb00619.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. VALENČÍK, R. (2008). Teorie her a redistribuční systémy. Praha: VŠFS - Eupress. VALENČÍK, R., BUDINSKÝ, P. (2009). Teorie redistribučních systémů. Politickáekonomie. 57(5), pp. 644-659.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. WILHELM, P. G. (2002). International validation of the corruption perceptions index: Implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. Journal of BusinessEthics. 35(3), pp. 177-189.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. WALLIS, J.J. (2004). The Concept of Systematic Corruption in American Political and Economic History. NBER Working Paper 10952.10.3386/w10952
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. WAWROSZ, P. (2011). Dosahování a narušování institucionální rovnováhy v redistribučních systémech. Politická ekonomie. 59(4), pp. 526-546.10.18267/j.polek.803
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2013-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1804-1663 | Journal ISSN: 1213-2446
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 92 - 107
Published on: Jul 9, 2013
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Corruption,
redistribution system,
parallel redistribution game,
game theory
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures

© 2013 Tomáš Otáhal, Milan Palát, Petr Wawrosz, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 13 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)