Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Methodology for Homogenous Market Area Determination HAD2 - Mission Accomplished

Real Estate Management and Valuation
Volume 33 (2025): Issue 1 (March 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2025

References

  1. Alenany, E., Lekham, L. A., & Lu, S. (2021). Integrated clustering regression for real estate valuation. Real Estate Finance. Aspen Publishers Inc.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Araldi, A., & Fusco, G. (2017). Decomposing and recomposing urban fabric: The city from the pedestrian point of view. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2017: 17th International Conference, Trieste, Italy, July 3-6, 2017 [Springer International Publishing]. Proceedings, 17(Part IV), 365–376.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bogin, A. N., & Shui, J. (2020). Appraisal accuracy and automated valuation models in rural areas. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 60(1-2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-019-09712-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-019-09727-7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Boots, B., Okabe, A., & Sugihara, K. (1999). Spatial tessellations. Geographical information systems, 1, 503-526.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bruna, F. (2024). Market potential, spatial theories and spatial trends. Spatial Economic Analysis, 19(4), 1527–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2024.2325517, https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2024.2339022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Cellmer, R., & Kuryj, J. (2011). Określanie stref o podobnej cenności gruntów z wykorzystaniem metod geostatystycznych. Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości, 19(3), 7–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Cellmer, R., Bełej, M., & Trojanek, R. (2024). Housing prices and points of interest in three Polish cities. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39, 1509–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10124-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Chen, M., Chun, Y., & Griffith, D. A. (2023). Delineating housing submarkets using space–time house sales data: Spatially constrained data-driven approaches. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(6), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16060291
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Chen, S., Sleipness, O., Xu, Y., Park, K., & Christensen, K. (2020). A systematic review of alternative protocols for evaluating nonspatial dimensions of urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cienciała, A., Sajnóg, N., & Sobolewska-Mikulska, K. (2023). Unreliability of cadastral data on parcel area and its effect on sustainable real estate valuation. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 116(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2023-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., & Forte, F. (2017). Using genetic algorithms for real estate appraisals. Buildings, 7(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Eremeev, S. V., Kuptsov, K. V., & Seltsova, E. A. (2017). Algorithm for selecting homogeneous regions from a set of spatial objects. In 2017 XX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM) (pp. 109-112). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2017.7970511
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Fleischmann, M. (2019). Momepy: Urban morphology measuring toolkit. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1807. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01807
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Fleischmann, M., Feliciotti, A., Romice, O., & Porta, S. (2020). Morphological tessellation as a way of partitioning space: Improving consistency in urban morphology at the plot scale. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 80, 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101441
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Glennon, D., Kiefer, H., & Mayock, T. (2018). Measurement error in residential property valuation: An application of forecast combination. Journal of Housing Economics, 41, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2018.02.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Gnat, S. (2019). Measurement of entropy in the assessment of homogeneity of areas valued with the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Journal of Economics and Management, 38(4), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2019.38.05
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Grzelka, K., Bieda, A., Bydłosz, J., & Kondak, A. (2023). Visual perception of property rights in 3D. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(4), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12040164
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hamelink, F., Hoesli, M., Lizieri, C., & MacGregor, B. D. (2000). Homogeneous commercial property market groupings and portfolio construction in the United Kingdom. Environment & Planning A, 32(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1068/a31146
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment & Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301531
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Heckman, J. J. (2008). Econometric causality. International Statistical Review, 76(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00024.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. IAAO. (2017). Standard of Mass Appraisal of Real Property. International Association of Assessing Officers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Jordahl, K., Van den Bossche, J., Wasserman, J., McBride, J., Gerard, J., Tratner, J., . . . Farmer, C. (2021). Geopandas/Geopandas: v0. 5.0. Zenodo.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Keskin, B., & Watkins, C. (2017). Defining spatial housing submarkets: Exploring the case for expert delineated boundaries. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 54(6), 1446–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kindström, D., Makkonen, H., & Kaartemo, V. (2023). Delineating the fuzzy front end of market shaping. Industrial Marketing Management, 112, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.05.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Manganelli, B., Pontrandolfi, P., Azzato, A., & Murgante, B. (2014). Using geographically weighted regression for housing market segmentation. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 9(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2014.065100
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Massimo, D.E., Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Forte, F., Musolino, M., Malerba, A. (2019). Geographically weighted regression for the post carbon city and real estate market analysis: A case study. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_17
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Mazurek-Łopacińska, K., & Sobocińska, M. (2018). Triangulacja w badaniach jakościowych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (525). https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.525.01
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. McCluskey, W. J., & Borst, R. A. (2017). The Theory and practice of comparable selection in real estate valuation. Studies in systems. Decision and Control, 86, 307–330.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Meszek, W. (2013). Property valuation under uncertainty. Simulation vs strategic model. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 17(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.782165
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Morano, P., & Manganelli, B. (2014). Estimating the market value of the building sites for homogeneous areas. Advanced Materials Research, 869, 14–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Nadolna, B. (2012). Paradygmaty badawcze nauk społecznych a triangulacja metod badawczych w rachunkowości zarządczej. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 66, 153–164.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Pagourtzi, E., Assimakopoulos, V., Hatzichristos, T., & French, N. (2003). Real estate appraisal: A review of valuation methods. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 21(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780310483656
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Pelorosso, R. (2020). Modeling and urban planning: A systematic review of performance-based approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101867
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Pozoukidou, G., & Chatziyiannaki, Z. (2021). 15-Minute City: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia. Sustainability (Basel), 13(2), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020928
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Rae, A. (2015). Online housing search and the geography of submarkets. Housing Studies, 30(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.974142
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Renigier-Bilozor, M., Janowski, A., & Walacik, M. (2019). Geoscience methods in real estate market analyses subjectivity decrease. Geosciences, 9(3), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9030130
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Renigier-Biłozor, M., Janowski, A., Walacik, M., & Chmielewska, A. (2022). Modern challenges of property market analysishomogeneous areas determination. Land Use Policy, 119, 106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106209
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Renigier-Biłozor, M., Walacik, M., Źróbek, S., & d’Amato, M. (2018). Forced sale discount on property market–How to assess it? Land Use Policy, 78, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.026
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Rey, S. J., & Anselin, L. (2009). PySAL: A Python library of spatial analytical methods. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis: Software tools, methods and applications (pp. 175-193). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 11
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. RICS. (2021). Valuation - Global Standards. RICS. https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-andguidance/sector-standards/valuation-standards/red-book/redbook-global
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Sokal, R. R. (1963). The principles and practice of numerical taxonomy. Taxon, 12, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/1217562
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Su, T., Dharmasena, S., Leatham, D., & Gilliland, C. (2024). Texas rural land market integration: A causal analysis using machine learning applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 18, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100604
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Sugihara, K., & Inagaki, H. (1995). Why is the 3D Delaunay triangulation difficult to construct? Information Processing Letters, 54(5), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(95)00028-B
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. TEGOVA. (2020). European Valuation Standards. TEGOVA. https://tegova.org/static/72fa037473e198cbd428e465158bcfdb/a6048c931cdc93_TEGOVA_EVS_2020_digital.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Usman, H., & Lizam, M. (2023). Exploring some spatially constrained delineation methods in segmenting the Malaysian commercial property market. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 27(6), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2023.20498
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Varol, S., & Catma, S. (2024). Unlocking insights in real estate markets: Integrating geo-spatial data for comprehensive property valuation and urban planning. Data in Brief, 57, 111141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.111141 PMID:39687372
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Walacik, M. (2024). Property appraisal via lens of property registration abundance–real estate market asymmetry assessment. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 28(6), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2024.22686
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Walacik, M., & Janowski, A. (2024). The original methodology for homogenous area determination (HAD) for the purpose of property taxation procedures’ fairness and equity increase [Unpublished presentation form GIS/Valuation Technologies Conference 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Walacik, M., Renigier-Biłozor, M., Chmielewska, A., & Janowski, A. (2020). Property sustainable value versus highest and best use analyzes. Sustainable Development (Bradford), 28(6), 1755–1772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2122
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Watkins, C. (1999). Property valuation and the structure of urban housing markets. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 17(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635789910258543
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Watkins, C. A. (1998). The definition and identification of housing submarkets in Glasgow. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Paisley).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Wisniewski, R., & Brzezicka, J. (2021). Glocal real estate market: Evidence from European Countries. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 14(1), 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-09-2019-0031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Wu, C., & Sharma, R. (2012). Housing submarket classification: The role of spatial contiguity. Applied Geography (Sevenoaks, England), 32(2), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Wu, Y., Wei, Y. D., & Li, H. (2020). Analyzing spatial heterogeneity of housing prices using large datasets. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 13(1), 223–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09301-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Wyatt, P. (2022). Property valuation. John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Ying, Y., Koeva, M., Kuffer, M., Asiama, K. O., Li, X., & Zevenbergen, J. (2022). The perception of the vertical dimension (3D) through the lens of different stakeholders in the property market of China. Land (Basel), 11(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020312
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Zhen, W., Yang, L., Kwan, M. P., Zuo, Z., Wan, B., Zhou, S., Li, S., Ye, Y., Qian, H., & Pan, X. … (2020). Capturing what human eyes perceive: A visual hierarchy generation approach to emulating saliency-based visual attention for grid-like urban street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 80, 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101454
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2025-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5289
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 124
Submitted on: Dec 18, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 2, 2025
Published on: Feb 5, 2025
Published by: Real Estate Management and Valuation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
property market tessellation,
real estate valuation,
homogeneity,
similarity
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other

© 2025 Marek Walacik, published by Real Estate Management and Valuation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 33 (2025): Issue 1 (March 2025)