Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate Cover

Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate

By: Tom Kauko  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S., Poon J., Hutchison N., Watkins C., Gibb K., 2003, Benchmarking urban regeneration, RICS Foundation, London, England.
  2. Adams D., Dunse N., White M., 2005, Conceptualising State–Market Relations in Land and Property: The Growth of Institutionalism – Extension or Challenge to Mainstream Economics? In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 37-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch3
  3. Angjellari-Dajci F., Cebula R.J., 2016, The impact of historic district designation on the prices of singlefamily homes in the oldest city in the United States, St. Augustine, Florida, Journal of Property Research, 33(1), 64-96.10.1080/09599916.2016.1151918
  4. Ball M., 1998, Institutions in British Property Research: A Review. Urban Studies, 35(9), 1501-1517.10.1080/0042098984259
  5. Ball M., Jones C., 2013, Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 167-169.10.1080/09599916.2013.790465
  6. Bramley G., 2013, Housing market models and planning Town Planning Review, 84(11), 9-35.10.3828/tpr.2013.2
  7. Bromley D.W., 2008a, Beyond Market Failure: Volitional Pragmatism as a New Theory of Public Policy, Economia Politica, XXV(2), pp. 219-241.
  8. Bromley D.W., 2008b, Volitional pragmatism, Ecological Economics, 68, 1-13.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.012
  9. Buitelaar E., Segeren A., 2011, Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property Rights, Housing Studies, 26(5), 661-679.10.1080/02673037.2011.581909
  10. Cheshire P.C., 2013, Land market regulation: market versus policy failures, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 170-188.10.1080/09599916.2013.791339
  11. Crook A.D., Monk S., 2011, Planning gains, providing homes, Housing Studies, 26(7-8), 997-1018.10.1080/02673037.2011.619423
  12. d’Amato M., Kauko T., 2008, Hedonic indexes on residential rents in the real estate market of Bari: a contribution to urban planning, In Miller, D., Khakee, A., Hull, A. and Woltjer, J. (Eds.): New Principles in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 143-165.
  13. Dunse N., Thanos S., Bramley G., 2013, Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 221-238.10.1080/09599916.2013.795992
  14. Evans A.W., 2008, Economics and land use planning, Online edition. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Goetgeluk R., Kauko T., Priemus H., 2005, Can Red Pay for Blue? Methods to Estimate the Added Value of Water in Residential Environments, Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, 48(1), 103-120.10.1080/0964056042000308175
  16. Guy S., Henneberry J., 2000, Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research, Urban Studies, 37(13), 2399-2416.10.1080/00420980020005398
  17. Havel M.B., 2009, Property rights regime in land development–Analysis of the influence of institutions on land development in terms of the property rights theory, Doctoral dissertation. HUT, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Surveying. Available online at https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/13437/isbn9789526036717.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed 5 March, 2019].
  18. Havel M.B., 2014, Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition, Land Use Policy, 38, 615-626.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.004
  19. Healey P., 1991, Models of the development process; a review, Journal of Property Research, 8, 219-238.10.1080/09599919108724039
  20. Healey P., 1998, Regulating property development and the capacity of the development industry, Journal of Property Research, 15 (3), 211-227.10.1080/095999198368374
  21. Henneberry J., Parris S., 2013, The embedded developer: using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 227-249.10.3828/tpr.2013.13
  22. Hillier J., 2010, Introduction, In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 1-34.
  23. Hincks S., Leishman Ch., Watkins C., 2013, Introduction. Planning and housing: concepts, policy instruments and market analysis, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 1-7.10.3828/tpr.2013.9
  24. Hutchison N., Disberry A., 2015, Market forces or institutional factors: what hinders housing development on brownfield land? Journal of European Real Estate Research, 8(3), 285-304.10.1108/JERER-07-2015-0029
  25. Jaffe A.J., 1996, On the Role of Transaction Costs and Property Rights in Housing Markets, Housing Studies, 11(3), 425-434.10.1080/02673039608720866
  26. KAUKO T., 2003a, Planning processes, development potential and house prices: contesting positive and normative argumentation. Focus article. Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 113-126.10.1080/14036090310016970
  27. KAUKO T., 2003b, The Importance of the Context and the Level of Analysis. Author’s response, Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 134-136.10.1080/14036090310020885
  28. KAUKO T., 2012a, Recreating residential property values in the inner city – an adapted ‘old’ institutional approach, Journal of Property Research, 29(2), 153-176.10.1080/09599916.2011.649488
  29. KAUKO T., 2012b, An institutional analysis of property development, good governance and urban sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20(12), 2053-2071.10.1080/09654313.2012.722926
  30. Keil A., 2006, New Urban Governance Processes on the Level of Neighbourhoods, European Planning Studies, 14(3), 335-364.10.1080/09654310500420826
  31. Keogh G., D’Arcy E., 1999, Property market efficiency: an institutional economics perspective, Urban Studies, 36(13), 2401-2414.10.1080/0042098992485
  32. Keogh G., D’Arcy, É., 2000, Graaskamp, institutional economics, and the real estate market, In Essays in Honor of James A. Graaskamp: Ten Years After, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 385-409.10.1007/978-1-4615-1703-0_19
  33. Kucharska-Stasiak E., 2016, Grey zone in the Real estate market, Real Estate Management and Valuation, 24(3), 83-92.10.1515/remav-2016-0023
  34. Łaszek J., Olszewski K., Waszczuk J., 2016, Monopolistic Competition and Price Discrimination as a Development Company Strategy in the Primary Housing Market, Critical Housing Analysis, 3(2), 1-12.10.13060/23362839.2016.3.2.286
  35. Lauridsen J., Nannerup N., Skak M., 2013, House prices and land regulation in the Copenhagen area, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 205-220.10.1080/09599916.2013.791340
  36. Leffers D., 2017, Real estate developers’ influence of land use legislation in the Toronto region: An institutionalist investigation of developers, land conflict and property law, Urban Studies, 9 November, 1-17.10.1177/0042098017736426
  37. Liu N., Roberts D., 2013, Counter-urbanisation, planning and house prices: an analysis of the Aberdeen Housing Market Area, 1984-2010, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 81-105.10.3828/tpr.2013.5
  38. Monk S., Whitehead C.M.E., 1999, Evaluating the Economic Impact of Planning Controls in the United Kingdom: Some Implications for Housing, Land Economics, 75 (1), 74-93.10.2307/3146994
  39. Monk S., Pearce B., Whitehead C., 1991, Planning, land supply and house prices – a literature review, Land Economy Monograph 21, University of Cambridge.
  40. Mooya M.M., 2011, Making urban real estate markets work for the poor: Theory, policy and practice, Cities, 28, 238-244.10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.006
  41. Needham B., de Kam G., 2004, Understanding How Land is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs, Urban Studies, 41(10), September, 2061-2076.10.1080/0042098042000256387
  42. Payne S., 2013, Pioneers, pragmatists and sceptics: speculative housebuilders and brownfield development in the early twenty-first century, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 37-62.10.3828/tpr.2013.3
  43. Peel D., Lloyd M.G., 2007, Neo-traditional planning. Towards a new ethos for land use planning? Land Use Policy 24, 393-403.10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.05.003
  44. Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1990, The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review, Land Economics, August, 66(3), 294-314.10.2307/3146731
  45. Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1991, Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey, Urban Studies, 28(4), 597-621.10.1080/00420989120080681
  46. Roulac S., 2007, Brand + beauty + utility = property value, Property Management, 25(5), 428-446.10.1108/02637470710824711
  47. Ruming K.J., 2010, Developer Typologies in Urban Renewal in Sydney: Recognising the Role of Informal Associations between Developers and Local Government, Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 65-83.10.1080/08111140903356403
  48. Scott W.R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
  49. Shatkin G., 2016, The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia, Cities, 53, 141-149.10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015
  50. Taylor Z., 2013, Rethinking planning culture: a new institutionalist approach, Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683-702.10.3828/tpr.2013.36
  51. Theurillat Th., Rérat P., Crevoisier O., 2015, The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories, Urban Studies, 52(8), 1414-1433.10.1177/0042098014536238
  52. Tiesdell S., Allmendinger P., 2005, Planning Tools and Markets: Towards an Extended Conceptualisation, In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 56-76. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch4
  53. van Rij E., Korthals Altes W., 2010, Looking for the optimum relationship between spatial planning and land development, Town Planning Review, 81(3), 283-30110.3828/tpr.2010.2
  54. Vatn A., 2005, Institutions and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  55. Versteeg W., Hajer M., 2010, Is This How It Is, or Is This How It Is Here? In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 159-182.
  56. Walsh E., 2017, Public versus private land controls in England and the US, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 9(1), 18-31.10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0013
  57. Webster CH., 2005, The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons, Town Planning Review, 76(4), 455-502.10.3828/tpr.76.4.5
  58. Weston R. 2003, Rhetoric: Methodology or Method? And Other Views from Heterodoxy, Comment on Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 132-133.10.1080/14036090310016989
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 30
Published on: Oct 11, 2019
Published by: Real Estate Management and Valuation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Tom Kauko, published by Real Estate Management and Valuation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.