Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Access of primary school students to information and communication technologies in Turkey Cover

Access of primary school students to information and communication technologies in Turkey

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Aydın, M. B. (2016). Teachers’ views on the use of information and communication technologies in social studies education (Antalya). [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Turkey]. http://hdl.handle.net/11499/1056
  2. Badasyan, N., & Silva, S. (2018). The impact of internet access at home and/or school on students’ academic performance in urban areas in Brazil. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2018.092198">https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2018.092198
  3. Bahia, K., & Delaporte, A. (2021). The state of mobile internet connectivity report 2021. GSMA, London, UK.
  4. Bhat. (2023). The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET). 2. 592-596. 10.54443/ijset.v2i9.218.
  5. BTK. (2021). Fiber Altyapının Geliştirilmesinde Uluslararası Uygulamalar. BTK, Ankara, Türkiye.
  6. Bildircin, M. (2021, September 13). ‘Project of the century’ Fatih turned into a black hole. https://www.birgun.net/haber/asrin-projesi-fatihkaradelige-donustu-358449
  7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027">https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  8. Ekici, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2013). An evaluation on the FATIH Project. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tk/issue/48832/622078
  9. Emin, M. N., & Altunel, M. (2021). Turkey’s distance education experience during the coronavirus period. SETA Publishing. https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2021/08/R190.pdf
  10. ERG. (2021a). Education monitoring report 2021: Students and access to education. Online report, Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/EIR21_OgrencilerveEgitimeErisim.pdf
  11. ERG. (2021b). Education in Turkey under the impact of COVID-19. Report for TUSIAD, İstanbul. https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10820-tusiad-erg-COVID-19-etkisinde-Turkey-de-egitim
  12. European Parliament and Council. (2020). EU Data Governance Act. In EUR-Lex (No. 52020PC0767). European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0767
  13. Fatih Project. (2022). Fatih project. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr
  14. Human Development Report. (2020). United Nations development programme: New York. Report, New York. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020
  15. Hussain, I., & Safdar, M. (2008). Role of information technology in teaching learning process: Perception of the faculty. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 46-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/156261
  16. İra, N., Yıldız, M., Yıldız, G., Yalçınkaya-Önder, E., & Aksu, A. (2021). Access to information technology of households and secondary school students in Turkey. Information Development, 37(3), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211008949">https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211008949
  17. ITU/UN tech agency. (2021, November 30). The need for increased digital accessibility during COVID-19 — and beyond. ITU Hub. https://www.itu.int/hub/2020/06/the-need-for-increased-digital-accessibility-during-COVID-19-and-beyond/
  18. Johns Hopkins University, World Bank and UNICEF. (2021). COVID-19 global education recovery tracker. www.COVIDeducationrecovery.global
  19. Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method. Nobel Publishing. https://www.nobelyayin.com/bilimsel-arastirmayontemi-kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler_1755.html
  20. Kılıç, Ç. (2011). The problem of digital divide in a globalizing world. Erzincan University Education Faculty Journal, 19, 81-91. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/erziefd/issue/5998/79975
  21. Malamud, O., Cueto, S., Cristia, J., & Beuermann, D. W. (2019). Home internet access and child development: Evidence from Peru. www.voxeu.org/article/home-internet-access-and-child-development
  22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  23. MoNE. (2020). Turkey has pushed the lists of the digital world with its distance education statistics. www.meb.gov.tr/Turkey-uzaktan-egitim-istatistikleriyle-dijital-dunyanin-listelerini-zorladi/haber/21158/tr
  24. MoNE YEĞİTEK. (2020). Safe schooling and distance education project: Environmental and social management framework. http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_10/20202440_CYevresel_ve_Sosyal_YoYnetim_CYercYevesi_19102020.pdf
  25. MoNE. (2021a). Distance education in numbers Yiğitek-meb. https://lk.tc/edGwQ
  26. MoNE. (2021b). National education statistics formal education 2020/2021. Report for the Department of Education, Turkey. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=424
  27. Ng, P. T. (2021). Timely change and timeless constants: COVID-19 and educational change in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09285-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09285-3
  28. Norberg, A., & Jahnke, I. (2014). Blowing backwards into the future of ICT in education. In: Conference of European University Information Systems, EUNIS 2012, Umeå University, Umeå. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292329099_Blowing_Backwards_into_the_Future_of_ICT_in_Education
  29. OECD. (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/35995145.pdf
  30. OECD. (2015). PISA the OECD program for international student assessment. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/37474503.pdf
  31. OECD. (2019). Pisa, 2021 ICT Framework. Paris. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-ICT-Framework.pdf
  32. OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021. OECD Publishing: Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en">https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
  33. OECD. (2022a). PISA 2025 learning in the digital world. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/learning-digital-world/ (04.03.2022)
  34. OECD. (2022b). ICT access and usage by households and individuals. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ICT_HH2
  35. Özenç-İra, G., İra, N., & Güngör, Ş. (2021). German education system. In S. Kalyoncuoğlu & M. Şahin (Eds.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim güncel veriler ve eğitim perspektifleri (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 67–91). Nobel. https://www.nobelyayin.com/karsilastirmali-egitim-guncel-veriler-ve-egitim-perspektifleri-18024.html
  36. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M. et al. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2, 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
  37. Siddiq, F., Perman, G., & Mark. (2017). Learning in digital networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computer & Education, 6(109), 1-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.014
  38. TUIK. (2013). 06-15 yaş grubu çocuklarda bilişim teknolojileri kullanımı ve medya. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Use-of-Information-and-Communication-Technology-and-Media-by-Children-Aged-06-15-2013-15866
  39. TUIK. (2020). Çocuklarda Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cocuklarda-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2021-41132
  40. TUIK. (2021). İstatistiklerle çocuk, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Cocuk-2021-45633
  41. Unwin, T., Weber, M., Brugha, M., & Hollow, D. (2017). The future of learning and technology in deprived contexts. London: Save the Children, (2017), 1-58. https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/the_future_of_learning_and_technology.pdf
  42. Utah Valley University. (2024, January 29). Impact of technology on social justice, equality, and inclusion. Pressbooks. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/tech1010/chapter/impact-of-technology-on-social-justice-equality-and-inclusion/
  43. World Bank (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.world-bank.org/handle/10986/28340
  44. World Bank. (2021). Digital technologies in education. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/edutech#1
  45. World Bank Group Education. (2021, February 22). Education finance watch 2021. Report, UNESCO. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/education-finance-watch-2021
  46. We Are Social. (2022, February 14). Digital 2022: another year of bumper growth. We Are Social UK. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
  47. Wu, J. (2021). The role of information and communication technology in realizing sustainable education by 2030. UNICEF Global Development Commons. https://gdc.unicef.org/resource/role-information-and-communication-technology-realizing-sustainable-education-2030
  48. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (8th Ed.). Seçkin Publishing. https://www.seckin.com.tr/kitap/991264765
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2024-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 55
Published on: Jun 29, 2024
Published by: SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2024 Gözde Özenç Ira, Nejat İra, Şevket Güngörc, Pınar Çakır, Ali Aksu, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.