Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Electrochemotherapy for cutaneous tumors combined with tumor irradiation before or after treatment: feasibility, safety, and effectiveness Cover

Electrochemotherapy for cutaneous tumors combined with tumor irradiation before or after treatment: feasibility, safety, and effectiveness

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the 2 groups of patients treated with combined treatment with ECT and RT

ECT → RT (N = 18)RT → ECT (N = 19)P
TYPEN%TYPEN%Value
DIAGNOSIS*MM00%MM15%0.8896
BCC740%BCC526%
MA15%MA211%
SCC950%SCC948%
SAR15%SAR15%
OTH00%OTH15%
T-STAGET1317%T1632%0.5381
T21056%T2632%
T315%T3420%
T4317%T4316%
TX15%TX00%
MEANST.DEV.MEDIAN (RANGE)MEANST.DEV.MEDIAN (RANGE)
AGE801083 (59-94)811387 (50-96)0.7102
NODULES’ SIZE (mm)362530 (14-130)404130 (2-170)0.6513
MONTHS BETWEEN TREATMENTS5.73.65.3 (1-12)7.64.18 (1-12)0.1587

1 BCC = basal cell carcinoma, MA = breast cancer; MM = melanoma; OTH = other; SAR = soft tissue sarcoma; SCC = squamous cell carcinoma

1 In ECT → RT group OTH was neoplasia of the right parotid region, in RT → ECT group OTH was Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of maxillary sinus.

TABLE 2.

Data on treatments (RT and ECT) in the two groups of patients

ECT → RT (N = 18)RT → ECT (N = 19)P
TYPEN%N%Value
ELECTRODEplate00%plate211%0.3955
linear844%linear842%
hexagonal950%hexagonal947%
multiple16%multiple00%
DRUGI.V.1478%I.V.1368%0.7140
ADMINISTEREDI.T.422%I.T.632%
IRRADIATIONphotons1478%photons1579%1.000
electrons422%electrons421%
TABLE 3.

Reasons for the second treatment in the two groups of patients (p = 0.0423)

REASON FOR 2ND TREATMENTAfter PR of previous treatmentAfter SD or PD of previous treatmentRelapse after CR of previous treatment
ECT → RT (N=18)1242
Reason for RT67%22%11%
RT → ECT (N=19)5113
Reason for ECT26%58%16%
FIGURE 1.

Incidence of most common local symptoms in the two groups before and after the treatments.

FIGURE 2.

Distribution of short-term response in the 2 groups after the sequence of both treatments.

CR = complete response; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease; PD = progressive disease

TABLE 4.

Short term response in the 2 groups after the sequence of both treatments

ECT → RTRT → ECTP VALUE
N%N%
CR1267%947%0.0383
PR422%211%
SD211%15%
PD00%737%

1 CR = complete response; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease; PD = progressive disease

FIGURE 3.

Progression free survival (PFS) Kaplan-Meier curves.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2026-0051 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 427 - 435
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 20, 2026
Published on: Sep 7, 2026
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Giulia Bertino, Marta Minuti, Julie Gehl, Erika Kis, Hadrian Nassabi, Michele Pio Grieco, Giuseppe Riva, Matteo Mascherini, Francesca De Terlizzi, Maja Cemazar, Gregor Sersa, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.