Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis platforms: Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low-moderate risk patients Cover

A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis platforms: Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low-moderate risk patients

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Flowchart of patient selection and propensity score matching in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cohorts.
AVA = aortic valve area; BMI = body mass index; BSA = body surface area; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association; RBBB = Right Bundle Branch Block; STS = Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Flowchart of patient selection and propensity score matching in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cohorts. AVA = aortic valve area; BMI = body mass index; BSA = body surface area; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association; RBBB = Right Bundle Branch Block; STS = Society of Thoracic Surgeons

FIGURE 2.

Sizes of implanted transcatheter heart valves – (A) Myval series, (B) Sapien series, (C) Evolut series.
Sizes of implanted transcatheter heart valves – (A) Myval series, (B) Sapien series, (C) Evolut series.

FIGURE 3.

Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter implantation of Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series.
Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter implantation of Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series.

FIGURE 4.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of matched cohorts for 30 days (A) and 1 year (B) after transcatheter implantation of Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of matched cohorts for 30 days (A) and 1 year (B) after transcatheter implantation of Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Baseline characteristics and medical history of unmatched and matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with different THVs_ Data availability is provided in the first row for each variable, n (%)

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICSOverall Cohort (n = 1053)Unmatched cohortsMatched cohorts
Myval series (n = 97)Sapien series (n = 400)Evolut series (n = 556)p-value* (Overall)Myval series (n = 60)Sapien series (n = 60)Evolut series (n = 60)p-value* (Overall)
Age (Years), mean ± SDn = 1053 (100)n = 97 (100)n = 400 (100)n = 556 (100)0.682n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.729
81.3 ± 6.481.0 ± 6.580.7 ± 6.481.5 ± 6.7 81.3 ± 6.780.5 ± 6.681.5 ± 7.1
Sex, n (%)n = 1053 (100)n = 97 (100)n = 400 (100)n = 556 (100)0.009n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)
  Male, n (%)542 (51.5)52 (53.6)209 (46.2)311 (55.9)29 (48.3)24 (40.0)31 (51.7)0.419
  Female, n (%)511 (48.5)45 (46.4)243 (53.8)245 (44.1)31 (51.7)36 (60.0)29 (48.3)
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SDn = 1001 (95)n = 97 (100)n = 377 (94)n = 527 (95)0.003n=60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.88 5
27.59 ± 4.8728.56 ± 5.3127.99 ± 5.1827.12 ± 4.4928.06 ± 5.1227.62 ± 5.1427.83 ± 4.66
Body surface area (m2), mean ± SDn = 1001 (95)n = 97 (100)n = 377 (94)n = 527 (95)0.041n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.134
1.83 ± 0.211.87 ± 0.221.81 ± 0.211.83 ± 0.21.85 ± 0.221.78 ± 0.181.82 ± 0.21
Indication, n (%)n = 1051 (100)n = 97 (100)n = 398 (100)n = 556 (100)0.445n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)
  Stenosis1038 (98.8)96 (99.0)391 (98.2)551 (99.1)60 (100.0)59 (98.3)60 (100.0)1.000
  Regurgitation13 (1.2)1 (1.0)7 (1.8)5 (0.9)0 (0.0)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)
Etiology, n (%)n = 1050 (100)n = 97 (100)n = 399 (100)n = 554 (100)0.414n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)
  Degenerative980 (93.3)91 (93.8)366 (91.7)523 (94.4)55 (91.7)53 (88.3)55 (91.7)0.024
  Rheumatic3 (0.3)0 (0.0)1 (0.3)2 (0.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.7)
ViV, n (%)67 (6.4)6 (6.2)32 (8.0)29 (5.2)0.0115 (8.3)5 (8.3)0 (0.0)0.326
Creatinine (μmol/L), mean ± SDn = 995 (95)n = 97 (100)n = 368 (92)n = 530 (95)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)
111.95 ± 74.74102.32 ± 68.56105.00 ± 64.36118.55 ± 81.7094.58 ± 36.27100.97 ± 54.30111.13 ± 82.84
DVI, mean ± SDn = 704 (67)n = 68 (70)n = 263 (66)n = 373 (67)0.985n = 48 (80)n = 50 (83)n = 51 (85)0.706
0.20 ± 0.060.20 ± 0.040.20 ± 0.080.20 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.030.19 ± 0.050.19 ± 0.04
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mm Hg), mean ± SDn = 675 (64)n = 60 (62)n = 247 (62)n = 368 (66)0.158n = 42 (70)n = 51 (85)n = 53 (88)0.355
42.9 ± 13.340.6 ± 14.342.3 ± 13.343.7 ± 13.138.8 ± 12.841.8 ± 12.3842.4 ± 13.3
Euroscore 2, mean ± SDn = 920 (87)n = 96 (99)n = 321 (80)n = 503 (91)0.384n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.307
6.17 ± 6.745.41 ± 5.306.05 ± 6.516.40 ± 7.114.74 ± 3.826.40 ± 8.235.7 ± 4.72
STS score, mean ± SDn = 830 (79)n = 97 (100)n = 284 (71)n = 449 (81)0.219n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.359
4.43 ± 4.033.78 ± 3.094.28 ± 3.974.67 ± 4.243.90 ± 3.654.64 ± 5.515.07 ± 4.18
Annular perimeter (mm), mean ± SDn = 949 (90)n = 91 (94)n = 359 (90)n = 499 (90)0.871n = 56 (93)n = 59 (98)n = 60 (100)0.407
80.2 ± 35.579.5 ± 7.279.6 ± 31.380.8 ± 41.079.1 ± 6.877.3 ± 10.279.0 ± 7.2
Annular area (mm2), mean ± SDn = 968 (92)n = 92 (95)n = 368 (92)n = 508 (91)0.293n = 57 (95)n = 59 (98)n = 60 (100)0.774
464.5 ± 97.6476.7 ± 94.7459.6 ± 88.1465.9 ± 104.3 473.6 ± 92.3461.5 ± 95.3468.7 ± 85.8
NYHA class before, n (%)n = 994 (94)n = 97 (100)n = 367 (92)n = 530 (95)0.471n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)
  122 (2.2)4 (4.1)9 (2.5)9 (1.7)3 (5.0)2 (3.3)1 (1.7)
  2205 (20.6)17 (17.5)75 (20.4)113 (21.3)12 (20.0)15 (25.0)14 (23.3)0.963
  3653 (65.7)68 (70.1)245 (66.8)340 (64.2) 40 (66.7)38 (63.3)41 (68.3)
  4114 (11.5)8 (8.2)38 (10.4)68 (12.8) 5 (8.3)5 (8.3)4 (6.7)
Aortic regurgitation before, n (%)n = 918 (87)n = 84 (87)n = 333 (83)n = 501 (90)0.300n = 53 (88)n = 60 (100)n = 59 (98)
  None/trace284 (30.9)31 (36.9)101 (30.3)152 (30.3)21 (39.6)11 (18.3)12 (20.3)
  Mild522 (56.9)40 (47.6)194 (58.3)288 (57.5)25 (47.2)43 (71.7)43 (72.9)0.032
  Moderate90 (9.8)12 (14.3)27 (8.1)51 (10.2) 7 (13.2)5 (8.3)4 (6.8)
  Severe22 (2.4)1 (1.2)11 (3.3)10 (2.0) 0 (0.0)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)
Mitral regurgitation before, n (%)n = 882 (84)n = 82 (85)n = 327 (82)n = 473 (85)0.090n = 52 (87)n = 59 (98)n = 58 (97)
  None/trace111 (1.2)17 (20.7)35 (10.7)59 (12.5)12 (23.1)4 (6.8)2 (3.4)
  Mild697 (75.9)64 (78.1)261 (79.8)372 (78.6)40 (76.9)50 (84.7)50 (86.2)0.002
  Moderate69 (7.5)1 (1.2)29 (8.9)39 (8.2) 0 (0.0)5 (8.5)6 (10.3)
  Severe5 (0.5)0 (0.0)2 (0.6)3 (0.6) 0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Medical history, n (%)
  Arterial hypertension878 (83.4)88 (90.7)327 (81.8)463 (83.3)-56 (93.3)56 (93.3)54 (90.0)-
  Diabetes - oral antidiabetics179 (17.0)12 (12.4)63 (15.8)104 (18.7)-5 (8.3)8 (13.3)10 (16.7)-
  Diabetes -insulin dependent72 (6.8)7 (7.2)22 (5.5)43 (7.7)-6 (10.0)6 (10.0)5 (8.3)-
  Pulmonary disease139 (13.2)17 (17.5)43 (10.8)79 (14.2)-9 (15.0)9 (15.0)11 (18.3)-
  CKD (eGF < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)278 (26.4)28 (28.9)94 (23.5)156 (28.1)-18 (30.0)17 (28.3)13 (21.7)-
  CKD - dialysis24 (2.3)1 (1.0)5 (1.3)18 (3.2)-0 (0.0)1 (1.7)1 (1.7)-
  Hyperlipidemia300 (28.5)31 (32.0)107 (26.8)162 (29.1)-18 (30.0)23 (38.3)19 (31.7)-
Cardiac history, n (%)
  IHD (any type of revascularization, proximal significant coronary stenosis)254 (24.1)26 (26.8)79 (19.8)149 (26.8)-17 (28.3)11 (18.3)18 (30.0)-
  AV block I94 (8.9)8 (8.2)23 (5.8)63 (11.3)-3 (5.0)4 (6.7)9 (15.0)-
  AV block II8 (0.8)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)8 (1.4)-0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.7)-
  RBBB72 (6.8)8 (8.2)26 (6.5)38 (6.8)-7 (11.7)3 (5.0)4 (6.7)-
  LBBB89 (8.5)10 (10.3)33 (8.3)46 (8.3)-5 (8.3)9 (15.0)5 (8.3)-
  Atrial fibrillation15 (1.4)1 (1.03)4 (1.00)10 (1.8)-1 (1.67)2 (3.3)4 (6.7)-
  Atrial fibrillation - slow ventricular response242 (23.0)22 (22.7)91 (22.8)129 (23.2)-12 (20)14 (23.3)9 (15.0)-
  Electrosystolic rhythm66 (6.3)3 (3.1)32 (8.0)31 (5.6)-1 (1.67)4 (6.7)4 (6.7)-

Comparison of haemodynamic parameters in a matched cohort_ Data availability is provided in the first row for each variable, n (%)

Hemodynamic Outcomes in Matched CohortP value
ParametersCohortBefore procedureAfter procedure
Aortic Vmax (m/s), mean ± SDMyval seriesn = 56 (93) 4.3 ± 0.5n = 58 (97) 2.1 ± 0.5< 0.001
Evolut seriesn = 59 (98) 4.3 ± 0.6n = 54 (90) 1.8 ± 0.4< 0.001
Sapien seriesn = 58 (97) 4.3 ± 0.6n = 55 (92) 2.2 ± 0.4< 0.001
p-value (Myval vs. Evolut)0.780< 0.001
p-value (Myval vs. Sapien)0.9080.355
Aortic mean gradient (mm Hg), mean ± SDMyval seriesn = 60 (100) 47.2 ± 13.1n = 58 (97) 11.1 ±5.4< 0.001
Evolut seriesn = 60 (100) 46.6 ± 15.3n = 54 (90) 6.7 ± 2.61< 0.001
Sapien seriesn = 60 (100) 47.3 ± 14.8n = 54 (90) 10.8 ± 3.9< 0.001
p-value (Myval vs. Evolut)0.808< 0.001
p-value (Myval vs. Sapien)0.9580.684
AVA and EOA (cm2), mean ± SDMyval seriesn = 60 (100) 0.7 ±0.1n = 57 (95) 1.9 ± 0.5< 0.001
Evolut seriesn = 60 (100) 0.7 ± 0.1n = 51 (85) 1.8 ± 0.5< 0.001
Sapien seriesn = 60 (100) 0.6 ± 0.2n = 56 (93) 1.7 ± 0.5< 0.001
p-value (Myval vs. Evolut)0.1210.807
p-value (Myval vs. Sapien)0.0680.026
LVEF (%), mean ± SDMyval seriesn = 59 (98) 59.2 ± 11.1n = 52 (87) 61.6 ± 9.90.061
Evolut seriesn = 60 (100) 54.8 ± 14.7n = 52 (87) 58.5 ± 12.40.057
Sapien seriesn = 60 (100) 56.1 ± 15.8n = 53 (88) 58.3 ± 14.90.023
p-value (Myval vs. Evolut)0.0630.170
p-value (Myval vs. Sapien)0.2110.180

Summary of differences between Myval series, Sapien series, and Evolut series

DeviceMyval seriesSapien seriesEvolut series
Images
Support structureNickel-cobalt alloyCobalt-chromium alloyNitinol (nickel-titanium) frame
Valve structure53% open cells on the upper half and 47% closed cells on the lower half form the hexagonal frame for the hybrid honeycomb cell design conceptHeterogeneous frame design that incorporates hexagons and diamonds. Overall, the frame consists of 5 rungs and 12 open cells, where the upper cells are larger and the lower cells are smallerA radiopaque self-expanding nitinol support frame with a diamond cell configuration
Conventional sizes20, 23, 26, 29 mm20, 23, 26, 29 mm23, 26, 29 mm
Intermediate sizes21.5, 24.5, 27.5 mmNot availableNot available
Extra-large sizes30.5, 32 mmNot available34 mm
Valve annulus size range18.5-32.7 mm (area derived diameter)18.6-29.5 mm (area derived diameter)17/18–30 mm (CT-derived diameters)
Introducer sheath14F Python introducer sheath for all diameters (20-32 mm)Full retrievability of the undeployed Myval THV Series system14F eSheath for 20-26mm16F eSheath for 29mmThe Sapien THV system cannot be retrieved once inside the patientEvolut R & Evolut Pro: A 14F delivery system or an 18F sheath for 23–29 mm; a 16F delivery system or a 20F sheath for 34 mm.Evolut Pro+: 14F InLine sheath for 23-29 mm and 18 Fr InLine sheath for 34 mm Can be retrieved before full deployment
Deployment techniqueThe design generates a specific “zebra crossing” like pattern under fluoroscopy. This is used for position and deployment.The design does not generate any specific pattern. Positioning is at 50% using balloon radiopaque marker.The design does not generate any specific pattern. Positioning is controlled by radiopaque markers.

In-hospital cardiac complications in the propensity-score matched cohort_ Data availability is provided in the first row for each variable, n (%)

In-hospital outcomes, n (%)Myval series (n = 60)Sapien series (n = 60)Evolut series (n = 60)p-value overallp-value Myval series vs Evolut seriesp-value Myval series vs. Sapien seriesp-value Evolut series vs. Sapien series
Cardiac complicationsn = 59 (98)n = 60 (100)n = 59 (98)0.3901.0000.4910.272
3 (5.1)6 (10.0)2 (3.4)
New pericardial effusion0 (0.0)1 (1.7)1 (1.7)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Tamponade0 (0.0)4 (6.7)1 (1.7)0.1291.0000.1190.364
Annular rupture1 (1.7)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Valve embolization0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Improper valve position0 (0.0)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Conversion to heart surgery0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Periprocedural myocardial infarction (< 72h)2 (3.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0.3300.4960.4961.000
Spontaneous myocardial infarction (> 72h)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Neurological complicationsn = 58 (97)n = 58 (97)n = 59 (98)0.5340.3641.0000.619
3 (5.2)2 (3.4)1 (1.7)
Transient ischemic attack1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1 (1.7)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Ischemic cerebrovascular insult2 (3.4)2 (3.4)0 (0.0)0.5480.4961.0000.496
Hemorrhagic cerebrovascular insult0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Bleedingn = 59 (98)n = 59 (98)n = 60 (100)0.7680.7430.7411.000
4 (6.8)6 (10.2)6 (10.0)
Bleeding - minor3 (5.0)1 (1.7)2 (3.3)0.8721.0000.6191.000
Bleeding - major0 (0.0)4 (6.7)3 (5.0)0.1640.2460.1191.000
Bleeding - life-threatening1 (1.7)1 (1.7)1 (1.7)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Other complications
Acute kidney injuryn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.3500.3640.2071.000
1 (1.7)5 (8.3)4 (6.7)
New left bundle branch blockn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.4951.0000.4390.439
5 (8.3)2 (3.3)5 (8.3)
New atrial fibrillationn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)1.0001.0001.0001.000
2 (3.3)2 (3.3)1 (1.7)
Permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVIn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.7190.8161.0000.605
7 (11.9)6 (10.0)9 (15.0)
30-day mortalityn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)1.0001.0001.0001.000
2 (3.3)3 (5.0)2 (3.3)
1 -year mortalityn = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)n = 60 (100)0.9341.0001.0001.000
5 (8.3)5 (8.3)6 (10.0)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0046 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 498 - 509
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jun 24, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 27, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Matjaz Bunc, Klemen Steblovnik, Simon Terseglav, Jana Ambrozic, Mojca Bervar, Ljupka Dimitrovska, Miha Cercek, Ana Kovac, Patricija Pleskovic, Polonca Kogoj, Zlatko Fras, Miha Sustersic, Bojan Vrtovec, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.