Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Radiographic and pathologic response of myxoid liposarcoma treated with preoperative radiotherapy Cover

Radiographic and pathologic response of myxoid liposarcoma treated with preoperative radiotherapy

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Percentage change in volume during radiotherapy. Dotted lines represent individual tumors. Bold line indicates mean. Gray bar indicates 95% confidence interval.
Percentage change in volume during radiotherapy. Dotted lines represent individual tumors. Bold line indicates mean. Gray bar indicates 95% confidence interval.

FIGURE 2.

Percentage change in greatest dimension during radiotherapy. Dotted lines represent individual tumors. Bold line indicates mean. Gray bar indicates 95% confidence interval.
Percentage change in greatest dimension during radiotherapy. Dotted lines represent individual tumors. Bold line indicates mean. Gray bar indicates 95% confidence interval.

FIGURE 3.

Volumetric change in tumor size from (A) prior to treatment to (B) following 13 fractions in a patient who underwent mid-radiotherapy replanning. Red contour indicates gross tumor volume. The gross tumor volume decreased from 1780 cc prior to treatment to 1287 cc on the replanning scan.
Volumetric change in tumor size from (A) prior to treatment to (B) following 13 fractions in a patient who underwent mid-radiotherapy replanning. Red contour indicates gross tumor volume. The gross tumor volume decreased from 1780 cc prior to treatment to 1287 cc on the replanning scan.

Dosimetric comparison of original plan and replan for an individual patient

Original planReplan
Soft tissue avoid
  V30Gy(%)10.3%0.3%
Large bowel V45Gy(%)
  V45Gy(%)5.4%1.5%
  V50Gy(%)1.8%0.4%
Small bowel
  V30Gy(cc)101 cc82 cc
  V45Gy(cc)13 cc6 cc
  V50Gy(cc)2 cc1 cc
Rectum
  Mean dose23 Gy16 Gy
Genitalia
  Mean dose10 Gy6 Gy

Radiographic and pathologic characteristics

N = 20
Intratumoral enhancement
  Stable4 (20%)
  Decrease16 (80%)
Peritumoral enhancement
  Increase1 (5%)
  Not present15 (75%)
  Decrease4 (20%)
Peritumoral edema
  Increase4 (20%)
  Stable5 (25%)
  Decrease11 (55%)
Fat
  Increase11 (55%)
  Stable9 (45%)
Biopsy grade
  Low18 (90%)
  High2 (10%)
Margin status
  Negative18 (90%)
  Positive2 (10%)
Greatest pathologic dimension (cm)
  Median (IQR)9 (7–15)
Percentage viable tumor
  Median (IQR)5 (5–35)
Extensive pathologic response
  Median (IQR)16 (80%)

Patient and radiotherapy characteristics

N = 20
Sex
  Female8 (40%)
  Male12 (60%)
Age (years)
  Median (IQR)51 (39–60)
Tumor site
  Lower extremity, proximal13 (65%)
  Lower extremity, distal3 (15%)
  Trunk4 (20%)
Recurrence1 (5%)
Chemotherapy
  Neoadjuvant1 (5%)
  Adjuvant1 (5%)
RT modality
  3D conformal11 (55%)
  IMRT8 (40%)
  IMPT1 (5%)
RT dose
  36 Gy3 (15%)
  50 Gy16 (80%)
  56.25 Gy1 (5%)
IORT1 (5%)
Brachytherapy1 (5%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0032 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 176 - 182
Submitted on: Jan 14, 2025
|
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 16, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Robert W Gao, Judith AS Jebastin, Doris E Wenger, William S Harmsen, Andrew L Folpe, Michael G Haddock, Ivy A Petersen, Safia K Ahmed, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.