Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Introduction of a spectrophotometric method for salivary iodine determination on microplate based on Sandell-Kolthoff reaction Cover

Introduction of a spectrophotometric method for salivary iodine determination on microplate based on Sandell-Kolthoff reaction

Open Access
|Jul 2024

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Comparison of measurements of artificial saliva standards (ASS) by two different methods, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Sandell-Kolthoff method (S-K) using ammonium peroxydisulfate on microplate.
Comparison of measurements of artificial saliva standards (ASS) by two different methods, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Sandell-Kolthoff method (S-K) using ammonium peroxydisulfate on microplate.

FIGURE 2.

Comparison of different ammonium peroxydisulfate concentrations and their influence on the determined salivary iodine concentration. Comparison between 0.5 and 1.5 mol/L, as well as between 0.5 and 1.0 mol/L for all three samples showed significantly different values (P<0.001) for all three samples, whereas P values for samples 1, 2, and 3, showed no difference between 1.0 and 1.5 mol/L. The corresponding P values were 0.275, 0.085, and 0.761, respectively.
Comparison of different ammonium peroxydisulfate concentrations and their influence on the determined salivary iodine concentration. Comparison between 0.5 and 1.5 mol/L, as well as between 0.5 and 1.0 mol/L for all three samples showed significantly different values (P<0.001) for all three samples, whereas P values for samples 1, 2, and 3, showed no difference between 1.0 and 1.5 mol/L. The corresponding P values were 0.275, 0.085, and 0.761, respectively.

FIGURE 3.

Comparison of salivary iodine concentration (SLIC) determined by the Sandell-Kolthoff (S-K) method using ammonium peroxydisulfate on microplate and by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Passing-Bablock regression. The solid line shows the regression line, dashed lines show 95% confidence interval (CI) for the regression line, and dotted line shows the identity line Y = X. The sample size is N = 110. The regression equation is Y = 0.89*X+6.2. The slope is 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86−0.92), and the intercept is 6.2 (95% CI, 3.3−8.6). The Cusum test for linearity showed no significant deviation from linearity (P = 0.89).
Comparison of salivary iodine concentration (SLIC) determined by the Sandell-Kolthoff (S-K) method using ammonium peroxydisulfate on microplate and by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Passing-Bablock regression. The solid line shows the regression line, dashed lines show 95% confidence interval (CI) for the regression line, and dotted line shows the identity line Y = X. The sample size is N = 110. The regression equation is Y = 0.89*X+6.2. The slope is 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86−0.92), and the intercept is 6.2 (95% CI, 3.3−8.6). The Cusum test for linearity showed no significant deviation from linearity (P = 0.89).

FIGURE 4.

Bland-Altman plot of comparison of salivary iodine concentration (SLIC) determined by the Sandell-Kolthoff method (S-K) and by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Differences between the methods are plotted against the ICP-MS method, which is a gold standard method. Sample size is N = 110. Horizontal lines represent the mean SLIC by ICP-MS, zero difference, and 95% confidence interval limits of agreement, which are defined as mean difference plus/minus 1.96 times the standard deviation (SD) of the differences. The mean shows a positive bias of 5.9%.
Bland-Altman plot of comparison of salivary iodine concentration (SLIC) determined by the Sandell-Kolthoff method (S-K) and by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Differences between the methods are plotted against the ICP-MS method, which is a gold standard method. Sample size is N = 110. Horizontal lines represent the mean SLIC by ICP-MS, zero difference, and 95% confidence interval limits of agreement, which are defined as mean difference plus/minus 1.96 times the standard deviation (SD) of the differences. The mean shows a positive bias of 5.9%.

Recoveries of 6 different saliva samples spiked with 19_6, 38_5, 74_1, and 193_5 mg/L of stock solutions of potassium thiocyanate and of caffeine to saliva samples_ Recoveries are expressed as percentages of observed amount of iodine over expected amount of iodine after thiocyanate or caffeine stock solutions added to samples_ Each sample was measured 8 times and results are presented as mean salivary iodine concentration (SLIC) (SD) and as the mean percentage recovery (range) of iodine at each concentration level

ThiocyanateCaffeine

SLIC, μg/L (SD)Recovery, % (range)SLIC, μg/L (SD)Recovery, % (range)
Sample 134.7 (3.0)97.9 (97.3–100.5)29.1 (1.0)93.2 (90.7–96.3)
Sample 286.0 (7.4)101.2 (99.0–102.8)73.0 (1.6)99.3 (97.0–100.9)
Sample 390.7 (3.7)102.4 (99.0–105.0)75.2 (1.9)96.1 (92.0–100.4)
Sample 4109.0 (3.9)109.0 (95.9–104.9)101.3 (3.8)96.3 (94.1–99.0)
Sample 5143.0 (2.2)106.2 (103.8–108.7)142.1 (2.5)98.7 (96.1–105.3)
Sample 6150.6 (3.3)102.4 (98.2–107.7)152.8 (3.0)99.3 (97.3–101.3)

Dilutions of 4 saliva samples with deionised water_ Each sample was measured 8 times and results are presented as mean measured concentration (SD)_ Recoveries are expressed as the percentages of mean measured amount of iodine over expected amount of iodine after dilution

DilutionMeasured (M) μg/L (SD)Expected (E) μg/LM/E %
Sample 1Non-diluted105.7 (1.3)//
1:256.9 (1.3)52.9107.7
1:428.8 (2.0)26.4109
Sample 2Non-diluted35.6 (1.0)//
1:219.2 (1.4)17.8108.2
Sample 3Non-diluted76.7 (1.3)//
1:240.2 (1.7)38.4104.8
1:417.3 (1.2)19.290.3
Pooled sampleNon-diluted165.1 (5.4)//
1:265.0 (3.6)61.9105.0
1:433.8 (1.7)31.0109.1
1:817.2 (1.6)15.5111.1

Coefficients of variation (CV [%]) for intra- and inter-assay for 4 different iodine concentrations for salivary iodine concentration (SLIC)

LevelTarget value, μg/LNumber of measurementsIntra-assay imprecision, %Number of measurementsInter-assay imprecision, %
1204018.419820.7
2100405.11926.7
3350402.81214.3
Pooled sample165405.7805.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0035 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 357 - 365
Submitted on: Apr 16, 2024
Accepted on: May 28, 2024
Published on: Jul 22, 2024
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Adrijana Oblak, Jernej Imperl, Mitja Kolar, Gregor Marolt, Blaz Krhin, Katja Zaletel, Simona Gaberscek, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.