Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantitative SSTR-PET/CT: a potential tool for predicting everolimus response in neuroendoctine tumour patients Cover

Quantitative SSTR-PET/CT: a potential tool for predicting everolimus response in neuroendoctine tumour patients

Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

63-year-old female with responding liver metastasis of ileal neuroendocrine tumor. On the pretherapeutic PETCT (A, B) there were high tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio. After three months of treatment with everolimus, the liver metastasis showed no significant shrinkage in size, but a significantly reduced uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE (C, D) compared to pretherapeutic PET/CT (Tmax/Lmax: 0.94 vs. 2,09 and Tmean/Lmax 1.54 vs. 0.76).
63-year-old female with responding liver metastasis of ileal neuroendocrine tumor. On the pretherapeutic PETCT (A, B) there were high tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio. After three months of treatment with everolimus, the liver metastasis showed no significant shrinkage in size, but a significantly reduced uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE (C, D) compared to pretherapeutic PET/CT (Tmax/Lmax: 0.94 vs. 2,09 and Tmean/Lmax 1.54 vs. 0.76).

FIGURE 2.

31-year-old male with non-responding liver metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. On the pretherapeutic PET/CT (A, B) there were low tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratios. After three months of treatment with everolimus, liver metastasis (arrow) showed an increase in size on CT (C), but also a significantly increased uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE (D) compared to pretherapeutic PET/CT.
31-year-old male with non-responding liver metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. On the pretherapeutic PET/CT (A, B) there were low tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratios. After three months of treatment with everolimus, liver metastasis (arrow) showed an increase in size on CT (C), but also a significantly increased uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE (D) compared to pretherapeutic PET/CT.

FIGURE 3.

Predictive value of %-change of Tmean/Lmax ratio and %-change of Tmax/Lmax ratio.
Predictive value of %-change of Tmean/Lmax ratio and %-change of Tmax/Lmax ratio.

Clinical and imaging parameters at baseline and follow-up with changes

ResponderPre- vs. Post-therapyNon-responderp-valueR vs. NR Pre-treatmentR vs. NR Post-treatment


Pre-treatmentPost-treatmentpPre-treatmentPost-treatmentpp
Clinical parameters
Age63.5 +- 12.5 62.4 +- 13.4 0.42
Sex (male)10 (45%) 7 (37%) 0.2
Ki-67 %7.9 (+- 7.8) 10.5 (+-7) 0.28
Pre Bilirubin0.6 (0.2) 0.7 (0.3) 0.13
Pre CgA551 (77.6–933.5) 422 (47–1414) 0.11
Imaging parameters
SUVmax Liver8 (6–9.3)9.4 (5–10.9)0.176.9 (4.9–9.2)6.4 (3.5–10)0.050.60.1
SUVmean Spleen12.3 (9.9–18.6)16.4 (9.9–20.1)0.0213.8 (10.1–16.9)11 (9.8–15.1)0.040.30.5
SUVmax LM28.1 (15.1–35.3)22.2 (14.2–31.7)< 0.0121.3 (12.7–34.7)22.5 (9.4–29.6)0.190.30.6
SUVmean LM12.4 (10.5–19.1)12.9 (9.3–18.9)0.0314.5 (9.3–18.3)13.5 (7.8–17.4)0.130.40.5
Tmax/Lmax LM3.0 (2.4–4.3)2.4 (2–3.3)0.022.8 (2.4–3.8)3 (1.9–4.6)0.360.30.8
Tmean/Lmax LM1.8 (1.4–2.3)1.6 (1.2–1.9)0.021.9 (1.2–2.2)1.6 (1.4–2.5)0.260.20.7
Tmax/Smean LM1.6 (1.3–2.4)1.3 (0.9–1.7)0.251.5 (1.2–2.3)1.5 (0.9–3.0)0.30.40.8
Tmean/Smean LM1.0 (0.8–1.1)0.8 (0.5–1.0)0.490.9 (0.6–1.6)0.9 (0.5–1.6)0.460.51.0
Size LM21 (17–29)20 (15–31.2)0.6421 (15–32)21 (15–32)0.950.70.5
Density LM (HU)101.9 (± 19.9)90.5 (± 20.5)0.0389.4 (± 22.6)81.7 (± 22.1)0.10.20.3
SUVmax NET32.8 (6.9–39.8)30.4 (10.3–31.5)0.4936.4 (28.8–47.4)43.1 (29.7–53.7)0.970.50.3
SUVmean NET16 (4.6–16.9)13.4 (7.1–14.7)0.917.6 (14–19.4)22.3 (13.6–28.5)0.250.40.3
Size NET18 (15-36)25 (11.2–37.3)0.4843.5 (24–60.8)44.5 (25.3–66)0.370.70.5
Density NET83.3 (± 9.1)81.5 (± 18)0.989.3 (± 17.5)78.2 (± 11.6)0.40.60.8
Change (%) between pre- and post-treatmentResponderNon-responderR vs. NR p
SUVmax Liver−9.5 (−14–19.9)−13 (−37.5–8.7)0.04
SUVmean Spleen13 (−6.6–29.1)−10.7 (−26.3–2.6)0.01
SUVmax LM−20.4 (−27–6)−0.9 (−22.8–26.3)0.21
SUVmean LM−10 (−28.5–12.7)−7 (−23.4–11.1)0.62
Tmax/Lmax LM−15.5 (−47–5.5)5.5 (−20.4–20.7)0.01
Tmean/Lmax LM−16.3 (−37–9)7 (−22.3–31.1)0.03
Tmax/Smean LM−16.6 (−44.2–13.6)4.5 (−16.8–51.4)0.01
Tmean/Smean LM−16.3 (−39.3–8.8)0.9 (−17.4–50)0.04
Size LM−7 (−27.8–6.1)14.3 (−17.6–28)0.77
Density LM−5.6 (−12.3–0.2)−7 (−16.5–4.1)0.8
SUVmax NET−7.3 (−16.2–35.5)−18.1 (−41.6–25.6)0.77
SUVmean NET15.6 (−0.6–48)18.4 (−7.8–40.5)0.65
Size NET−15.9 (−37.4–11.1)3.6 (−2.1–13.3)0.72
Density NET−5.2 (−20–14.5)−18.3 (−22.9– −4.6)0.69
Bilirubin−33 (−61.7–0)−25 (−66.7–0)0.43
CgA56.4 (17.4–144.9)32.1 (−2.8–72.8)0.18

Patients demographics

Sex (male)17 (59%)
Age (mean + SD )63 ± 13.2
Grading
  G17 (24%)
  G220 (69%)
  G31 (3%)
  n/a1 (3%)
Ki-67 (mean + SD)9.1 ± 7.6
Primary tumor site
  Pancreas11 (38%)
  Stomach1 (3%)
  Liver1 (3%)
  Lung1 (3%)
  Small-intestine11 (38%)
  Kidney1 (3%)
  Breast1 (3%)
  Retroperitoneal1 (3%)
  Rectum1 (3%)
Bilirubin prior to therapy (mg/dl)0.6 (0.3–1.3)
Bilirubin after therapy (mg/dl)0.5 (0.2–2.6)
Median CgA prior to therapy (ng/ml) (range)487 (10 –8983)
Median CgA after therapy (ng/ml) (range)929 (43–23348)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0032 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 348 - 356
Submitted on: Mar 12, 2024
Accepted on: May 10, 2024
Published on: Jun 12, 2024
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Homeira Karim, Michael Winkelmann, Freba Grawe, Friederike Völter, Christoph Auernhammer, Johannes Rübenthaler, Jens Ricke, Maria Ingenerf, Christine Schmid-Tannwald, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.