Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The prognostic significance of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand on lymphoma cells and tumor-immune cells in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified Cover

The prognostic significance of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand on lymphoma cells and tumor-immune cells in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified

Open Access
|Feb 2024

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Representable images of the double immunohistochemical staining for (A) PD-1/PAX5 and (B) PD-L1/PAX5. Red chromogen indicates PAX5 in DLBCL, NOS nuclei of LCs, with brown chromogen is labeled PD-1 (A) or PD-L1 (B), respectively (40x magnification).DLBCL = diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; LCs = lymphoma cells; NOS = not otherwise specified; PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand
Representable images of the double immunohistochemical staining for (A) PD-1/PAX5 and (B) PD-L1/PAX5. Red chromogen indicates PAX5 in DLBCL, NOS nuclei of LCs, with brown chromogen is labeled PD-1 (A) or PD-L1 (B), respectively (40x magnification).DLBCL = diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; LCs = lymphoma cells; NOS = not otherwise specified; PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand

FIGURE 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival, representing only significant differences among all analyzed clinicopathological characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified patients.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival, representing only significant differences among all analyzed clinicopathological characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified patients.

FIGURE 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) for PD-1 and PD-L1 on tumor-immune cells. The cases were divided into four groups based on the cell count per high-power field. Furthermore, these cases were stratified into two classifications: negative (cell counts 0 and 1) and positive (cell counts 2 and 3).PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand; TICs = tumor immune cells.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) for PD-1 and PD-L1 on tumor-immune cells. The cases were divided into four groups based on the cell count per high-power field. Furthermore, these cases were stratified into two classifications: negative (cell counts 0 and 1) and positive (cell counts 2 and 3).PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand; TICs = tumor immune cells.

FIGURE 4.

Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival representing the influence of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on lymphoma cells (LCs). PD-1 expression on LCs was categorized as negative below 10%. PD-L1 expression on LCs was categorized as negative below 30%.PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival representing the influence of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on lymphoma cells (LCs). PD-1 expression on LCs was categorized as negative below 10%. PD-L1 expression on LCs was categorized as negative below 30%.PD-1 = programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1 = PD-1 ligand

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in association with clinicopathological characteristics of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified

PD-1 expression on TICsPD-1 expression on LCsPD-L1 expression on TICsPD-L1 expression on LCs
[N, (%)]PositiveNegativep valuePositiveNegativep valuePositiveNegativep valuePositiveNegativep value
Total83 (38.4)133 (61.6) 19 (8.8)197 (91.2) 135 (62.5)81 (37.5) 14 (6.5)202 (93.5)
Age 0.775 0.466 0.885 0.406
  ≤6031 (14.4)53 (24.5) 9 (4.2)75 (34.7) 53 (24.5)31 (14.4) 7 (3.2)77 (35.6)
  >6052 (24.1)80 (37.0) 10 (4.6)122 (56.5) 82 (38.0)50 (23.1) 7 (3.2)125 (57.9)
Sex 0.889 0.811 0.265 1.000
  Male39 (18.1)65 (30.1) 10 (4.6)94 (43.5) 61 (28.8)43 (19.9) 7 (3.2)97 (44.9)
  Female44 (20.4)68 (31.5) 9 (4.2)103 (47.7) 74 (34.2)38 (17.6) 7 (3.2)1,5 (48.6)
Ann Arbor stage 1.000 1.000 0.116 0.134
  I–II32 (14.8)52 (24.1) 7 (3.2)77 (35.6) 47 (21.8)37 (17.1) 3 (1.4)81 (37.5)
  III–IV51 (23.6)81 (37.5) 12 (5.6)120 (55.6) 88 (40.7)44 (20.4) 11 (5.1)121 (56.0)
Involvement of an extranodal organ 0.643 0.412 0.332 0.738
  Yes33 (18.9)39 (22.3) 8 (4.6)64 (36.6) 44 (25.1)28 (16.0) 3 (1.7)69 (39.4)
  No43 (24.6)60 (34.3) 7 (4.0)96 (54.9) 71 (40.6)32 (18.3) 6 (3.4)97 (55.4)
Involvement of spleen 0.847 1.000 0.540 1.000
  Yes15 (9.2)19 (11.7) 3 (1.8)31 (19.0) 25 (15.3)9 (5.5) 1 (0.6)33 (20.2)
  No61 (37.4)68 (41.7) 11 (6.7)118 (72.4) 87 (53.4)42 (25.8) 7 (4.3)122 (74.8)
B symptoms 0.366 0.598 0.536 0.085
  Yes27 (14.1)49 (25.5) 5 (2.6)71 (37.0) 52 (27.1)24 (12.5) 9 (4.7)67 (34.9)
  No50 (26.0)66 (34.4) 11 (5.7)105 (54.7) 73 (38.0)43 (22.4) 5 (2.6)111 (57.8)
IPI score 0.780 0.228 0.575 1.000
  0–245 (20.8)69 (31.9) 13 (6.0)101 (46.8) 69 (31.9)45 (20.8) 7 (3.2)107 (49.5)
  3–538 (17.6)64 (29.6) 6 (2.8)96 (44.4) 66 (30.6)36 (16.7) 7 (3.2)95 (44.0)
Hans Algorithm classification 0.258 0.224 0.887 0.047
Non-GCB31 (14.4)61 (28.2) 11 (5.1)88 (37.5) 58 (26.9)34 (15.7) 10 (4.6)82 (38.0)
GCB52 (24.1)72 (33.3) 8 (3.7)116 (53.7) 77 (35.6)47 (21.8)) 4 (1.9)120 (55.6)
Patients’ outcome 0.124 0.639 0.779 0.788
Alive45 (20.8)57 (26.4) 10 (4.6)92 (42.6) 65 (30.1)37 (17.1) 6 (2.8)96 (44.4)
Dead38 (17.6)76 (35.2) 9 (4.2)105 (48.6) 70 (32.4)44 (20.4) 8 (3.7)106 (49.1)

Description of the PAX5, PD-1 And PD-L1 antibodies and immunohistochemistry staining protocols

Primary AbCloneVendorReaction typeAntigen retrieval [100°C]Ab dilutionAb incubation time [min]IHC detection kit
PAX5SP34VentanaNuclearCC1 56 minRTU32 (37°C)UltraView Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red
PD-1NAT105DakoCytoplasmic, MembranousCC1 88 min1:20060 (37°C)OptiView DAB
PD-L1SP263VentanaCytoplasmic, MembranousCC1 64 minRTU16 (37°C)OptiView DAB

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the patients’ survival based on their clinicopathological characteristics and PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions on lymphoma cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in tissue samples of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis

PFSOSPFSOS

p valueMedian when patients have relapse [months]p valueMedian when patients died [months]p valueHR (95% CI)p valueHR (95% CI)
Age≤ 60 vs. > 600.33091.8 vs. 59.7< 0.001110.1 vs. 73.5 < 0.0012.907 (1.710–4.940)
SexMale vs. Female0.94569.1 vs. 80.90.32478.3 vs. 90.8
Ann Arbor stageI–II vs. III–IV0.04491.3 vs. 59.7< 0.001113.8 vs. 72.00.8451.072 (0.532–2.130)0.0731.654 (0.955–2.865)
Involvement of an extranodal organ(−) vs. (+)0.88677.4 vs. 74.10.45181.8 vs. 82.3
Involvement of the spleen(−) vs. (+)0.91569.9 vs. 81.80.84480.1 vs. 81.8
B symptoms(−) vs. (+)0.02585.3 vs. 30.80.00491.8 vs. 65.30.3381.319 (0.748–2.326)0.1701.354 (0.879–2.087)
IPI score0–2 vs. 3–50.00688.8 vs. 29.3< 0.001101.2 vs. 62.70.0481.945 (1.005–3.767)0.4941.205 (0.706–2.058)
Hans classificationNon-GCB vs. GCB0.91466.5 vs. 80.70.09577.6 vs. 85.9
PD-1 on TICs(−) vs. (+)0.79781.6 vs. 76.00.47885.9 vs. 80.7
PD-1 on LCs(−) vs. (+)0.65777.8 vs. 76.00.88284.9 vs. 76.3
PD-L1 on TICs(−) vs. (+)0.95585.9 vs. 76.20.623111.0 vs. 79.2
PD-L1 on LCs(−) vs. (+)0.01577.7 vs. 15.60.37385.1 vs. 22.30.0342.393 (1.070–5.352)

Clinicopathological characteristics of the Slovenian patient cohort (N = 216) included in the analysis

PD-1 on TICs ExpressionPD-1 on LCs ExpressionPD-L1 on TICs ExpressionPD-L1 on LCs Expression
(N, %)PositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegative
All cases (N = 216)83133191971358114202
Non-GCB subtype (N = 92)31 (37.3)61 (45.9)11 (57.9)81 (41.1)58 (43.0)34 (42.0)10 (71.4)82 (40.6)
GCB subtype (N = 142)52 (62.7)72 (54.1)8 (42.1)116 (58.9)77 (57.0)47 (58.0)4 (28.6)120 (59.4)
Non-GCB versus GCB subtype (p value)0.2580.2240.8870.047
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 109
Submitted on: Nov 7, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2023
Published on: Feb 21, 2024
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2024 Teja Cas Slak, Simona Miceska, Gorana Gasljevic, Lucka Boltezar, Veronika Kloboves-Prevodnik, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.