Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Correlation of t(14;18) translocation breakpoint site with clinical characteristics in follicular lymphoma Cover

Correlation of t(14;18) translocation breakpoint site with clinical characteristics in follicular lymphoma

Open Access
|Jul 2023

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Diagram of the BCL2/JH t(14;18) translocation breakpoints. Relative positions of major breakpoint region (MBR), 3′MBR subcluster, 5′mcr subcluster and minor cluster region (mcr) are shown according to the report of van Dongen JJM et al.16
Diagram of the BCL2/JH t(14;18) translocation breakpoints. Relative positions of major breakpoint region (MBR), 3′MBR subcluster, 5′mcr subcluster and minor cluster region (mcr) are shown according to the report of van Dongen JJM et al.16

FIGURE 2.

Comparison of progression-free survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.157. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr group: 0.235.MBR = major breakpoint region; mcr = minor cluster region
Comparison of progression-free survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.157. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr group: 0.235.MBR = major breakpoint region; mcr = minor cluster region

FIGURE 3.

Comparison of overall survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.426. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr group: 0.351.MBR = major breakpoint region; mcr = minor cluster region
Comparison of overall survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.426. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr group: 0.351.MBR = major breakpoint region; mcr = minor cluster region

FIGURE 4.

Comparison of lymphoma-specific overall survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.409. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr groups: 0.301.MBR = major breakpoint region, mcr = minor cluster region
Comparison of lymphoma-specific overall survival between the 3′MBR (blue), MBR (red) and mcr (green) groups. Censored cases are marked as vertical lines on their respective curves. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance: 0.409. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) significance comparing the MBR and mcr groups: 0.301.MBR = major breakpoint region, mcr = minor cluster region

Comparison of clinical features at diagnosis between the breakpoint-site groups (major breakpoint region [MBR], 3′MBR, mcr)

MBR (N = 63)3′MBR (N = 4)mcr (N = 17)p1p2
Median (mean) stage4 (3.70)4 (3.75)4 (3.94)0.3610.023
Median (mean) FLIPI2 (2.51)3 (2.75)3 (3.00)0.2260.094
Median (mean) age61 (60.25)62 (63.25)64 (63.71)0.4230.218

Sequences of primers used for detection of the t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation_ Relative positions of primers are indicated downstream of the first nucleotide of corresponding reference sequence

t(14;18) MBR primers

primer nameNCBI accession no.positionprimer sequence
MBR1AY220759.1(+193443)5′-GACCAGCAGATTCAAATCTATGG-3′
MBR2AY220759.1(+192940)5′-ACTCTGTGGCATTATTGCATTATAT-3′
t(14;18) 3′MBR primers
primer nameNCBI accession no.positionprimer sequence
3′MBR1AH010747.2(+717)5′-GCACCTGCTGGATACAACACTG-3′
3′MBR2AH010747.2(+1530)5′-GGTGACAGAGCAAAACATGAACA-3′
3′MBR3AH010747.2(+1787)5′-GTAATGACTGGGGAGCAAATCTT-3′
3′MBR4AH010747.2(+2718)5′-ACTGGTTGGCGTGGTTTAGAGA-3′
t(14;18) mcr primers
primer nameNCBI accession no.positionprimer sequence
mcr1AF275873.1(+1961)5′-TAGAGCAAGCGCCCAATAAATA-3′
mcr2AF275873.1(+2407)5′-TGAATGCCATCTCAAATCCAA-3′
5′mcrAH010747.2(+15849)5′-CCTTCTGAAAGAAACGAAAGCA-3′
Consensus JH primer
primer nameNCBI accession no.positionprimer sequence
JHOL807663.1(+239)3′-CCAGTGGCAGAGGAGTCCATTC-5′

Comparison of clinical features at diagnosis between the breakpoint-site groups (MBR, 3′MBR, mcr) using Fisher's exact test

MBR (N = 63)3′MBR (N = 4)mcr (N = 17)p1p2
Male sex24 (38%)1 (25%)4 (24%)0.5710.391
Grade* 311 (20%)2 (50%)4 (25%)0.3030.729
B-symptoms23 (37%)2 (50%)8 (47%)0.6410.576
Bulky disease**17 (27%)1 (25%)2 (12%)0.4970.335
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0030 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 487 - 492
Submitted on: Apr 4, 2023
Accepted on: May 31, 2023
Published on: Jul 13, 2023
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Matej Panjan, Lucka Boltezar, Srdjan Novakovic, Ira Kokovic, Barbara Jezersek Novakovic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.