Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantifying the changes in the tumour vascular micro-environment in spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy - a single arm prospective study Cover

Quantifying the changes in the tumour vascular micro-environment in spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy - a single arm prospective study

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the DP model. Contrast agent (CA) concentration within the vessel decreases with position (x) along the vessel length (L), producing concentration gradients between the arterial (x = 0) and venous (x = L) capillary ends. During the CA passage, a portion of the CA molecules diffuses between the plasma and extracellular, extravascular space (EES) at a controlled permeability surface area product (PS) rate, so that the plasma, Cp(x, t), and EES, Ce(x, t), concentrations show both spatial and temporal dependence.

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
1.Age ≥ 21 years1.Metastatic haematological and germ cell neoplasms
2.Proven metastatic disease2.Inability to undergo MRI or receive gadolinium contrast
3.Life expectancy > 3 months3.Prior radiotherapy to region of interest
4.Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG) 0–24.Recent immediate surgery surgical to affected intervention spinal levels, or patients requiring
5.≤ 3 contiguous vertebral body segments, including para-spinal disease5.Spinal instability score (SINS) > 12
6.Able to lie supine for ≥ 60 minutes6.Symptomatic cord compression (Bilksy grade 2 or 3), or worsening neurological deficits
Table 2

Patient characteristics

Dose (Gy)Fractions
169MRCCC1LungNon-opioidNoNoYes186Radioresistant histology, pain control243
260MRCCS1NilNilNoNoNo033Oligometatasis273
360MNSCLC-EGFR -T5Brain, lung bone.NilYesNoNo156Oligometastasis243
462FNSCLC-EGFR -C5Brain, bone nodal,OpioidNoNoNo187Oligometastasis, pain control242
575Madenocarcinoma ProstateT1BoneNilNoNoNo165Oligometastasis243
662Madenocarcinoma ColonL1LN, lungNilYesNoNo139Oligometastasis273
7a52MRCCL1BoneOpioidNoNoYes177Radioresistant histology, pain control27*3*
7b52MRCCL2BoneOpioidNoNoYes177Radioresistant histology, pain control27*3*
8a69FNSCLC-EGFR +T1Brain, lung bone.Non-OpioidNoNoYes135Oligometastasis243
8b69FNSCLC-EGFR +T10Brain, lung bone.Non-OpioidNoNoYes134Oligometastasis27*3*
8c69FNSCLC-EGFR +T12Brain, lung bone.Non-OpioidNoNoYes136Oligometastasis273
951Fductal Breast carcinoma InvasiveT4NilNilYesNoNo102Oligometastasis273
1072Madenocarcinoma ProstateL3NilNilNoNoNo232Oligometastasis242

[i] ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; F = female; LN = lymph nodes; M = male; Nil = nihil; NSCLC-EGFR - = non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation; NSCLC-EGFR + = non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation; RCC = renal cell carcinoma; SINS = spinal instability neoplastic score; VAS = visual analogue score

*Patient only completed 2 out of 3 fractions

Figure 2

Normalized values of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) parameters (A) time-dependent leakage (Ktrans); (B) permeability surface product (PS); (C) fractional plasma volume (Vp); (D) extracellular volume (Ve); and (E) perfusion.

Figure 3

(A) Representative images for Patient 7a showing at L1 with reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) parameters [i] time-dependent leakage (Ktrans); [ii] permeability surface product (PS); [iii] fractional plasma volume (Vp); [iv] extracellular volume (Ve); and [v] perfusion (F) across the 3 time points.

Figure 3

(B) [i] Metastatic deposit in L1 vertebral body (yellow arrow), as shown on T1 Axial MR (with gadolinium contrast); [ii] stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning image (CT, MRI fused). SBRT 27 Gy in 3 fractions, delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Clinical target volume (CTV) (blue outline), planning organ at risk volume (PRV)_cord (red outline), 95% isodose (orange colourwash).

Figure 4

Correlative plasma markers (A) acid sphingomyelinase (ASM); and (B) sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P).

Table 3

Clinical outcomes

Patient ID(Change Post-SBRT from VAS pre- SBRT baseline)Acute toxicityLate toxicityResponse at 3 months assessment (MD Anderson criteria)Follow-up duration (months)Local recurrence at last follow-upStatus of patient at last follow-up
10 (-8)G1 esophagitisNilPR39NoDead
20 (-3)NilNilPR54YesAlive
30 (-5)NilG1 compression fracturePR50NoAlive
40 (-8)G1 esophagitisNilSD15NoDead
53 (-3)G1 esophagitisNilPR22NoDead
60 (-3)NilNilSD13NoDead
7a2 (-5)NilG1 compression fracturePR42NoAlive
7b2 (-5)NilNilPR42NoAlive
8a-NilN/A-N/AN/ADead
8b-NilN/A-N/AN/ADead
8c-NilN/A-N/AN/ADead
90NilG3 compression fractureSD37NoAlive
100 (-3)NilNilPR22NoAlive

[i] Nil = nihil; PR = Partial response; SD = Stable disease; VAS = Visual analog scale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0046 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 525 - 534
Submitted on: Aug 24, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 29, 2022
Published on: Dec 13, 2022
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Balamurugan Vellayappan, Dennis Cheong, Salil Singbal, Jeremy Tey, Yu Yang Soon, Cheng Nang Leong, Alvin Wong, Sein Lwin, Chau Hung Lee, Pravin Periasamy, Simon Lo, Naresh Kumar, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.