Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Portal hypertension may influence the registration of hypointensity of small hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatobiliary phase in gadoxetic acid MR Cover

Portal hypertension may influence the registration of hypointensity of small hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatobiliary phase in gadoxetic acid MR

Open Access
|Aug 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Non-adequate quality in the liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the 20 minutes hepatobiliary phase. (A) and (B): patient with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B and clinically significant portal hypertension. (A): Baseline T1w-3D VIBE sequence. (B): the liver showed poor or non-apparent contrast uptake compared to the liver before contrast injection. (C) and (D): patient with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A 5 points with no clinically significant portal hypertension. (C): Baseline T1w-3D VIBE sequence. (D): the liver parenchyma showed very heterogeneous uptake of the contrast media, especially in the periphery of the right hepatic lobe.
Non-adequate quality in the liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the 20 minutes hepatobiliary phase. (A) and (B): patient with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B and clinically significant portal hypertension. (A): Baseline T1w-3D VIBE sequence. (B): the liver showed poor or non-apparent contrast uptake compared to the liver before contrast injection. (C) and (D): patient with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A 5 points with no clinically significant portal hypertension. (C): Baseline T1w-3D VIBE sequence. (D): the liver parenchyma showed very heterogeneous uptake of the contrast media, especially in the periphery of the right hepatic lobe.

Figure 2

Location of the 6 regions of interest (ROIs) in the liver parenchyma, to calculate the liver signal intensity (LSI) in the pre-contrast sequence (LSIpre) (A), at 10 minutes (LSI10) (B) and at 20 minutes (LSI20) hepatobiliary phase (C). Four of the ROIs were located in the anterior and posterior segments respectively of the right hepatic lobe, and two more were placed in the lateral and medial segments of the left lobe respectively. ROIs were drawn avoiding the inclusion of vascular structures and possible focal liver lesions.
Location of the 6 regions of interest (ROIs) in the liver parenchyma, to calculate the liver signal intensity (LSI) in the pre-contrast sequence (LSIpre) (A), at 10 minutes (LSI10) (B) and at 20 minutes (LSI20) hepatobiliary phase (C). Four of the ROIs were located in the anterior and posterior segments respectively of the right hepatic lobe, and two more were placed in the lateral and medial segments of the left lobe respectively. ROIs were drawn avoiding the inclusion of vascular structures and possible focal liver lesions.

Figure 3

Location of the region of interest in the 20 minutes hepatobiliary phase in the spleen (A), in the right paravertebral muscle (B), and in the upper pole of the right kidney (C) to calculate the different quantitative parameters of contrast liver uptake: spleen-liver intensity (SLI) and liver-spleen contrast ratio (LSCR), muscle-liver intensity (MLI) and the liver-muscle contrast ratio (LMCR) and kidney-liver intensity (KLI) and the liver-kidney contrast ratio (LKCR), respectively.
Location of the region of interest in the 20 minutes hepatobiliary phase in the spleen (A), in the right paravertebral muscle (B), and in the upper pole of the right kidney (C) to calculate the different quantitative parameters of contrast liver uptake: spleen-liver intensity (SLI) and liver-spleen contrast ratio (LSCR), muscle-liver intensity (MLI) and the liver-muscle contrast ratio (LMCR) and kidney-liver intensity (KLI) and the liver-kidney contrast ratio (LKCR), respectively.

Quantitative assessment of liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) during hepatobiliary phase (HPB) at 10 and 20 minutes in the study group considering the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH)_ On the left, including all study cohort and on the right, considering only cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A 5 points)_ Variables described as median and interquartile range

INDEXNo CSPH (all CP A-5 points)CSPHP valueNo CSPH (all CP A-5 points)CP A-5 points and CSPHP value
N1943 1925
RLE100.73 [0.52-0.89]0.57 [0.47-0.69]0.0270.73 [0.52-0.89]0.65 [0.51-0.77]NS
RLE200.73 [0.56-0.85]0.59 [0.47-0.74]NS0.73 [0.56-0.85]0.66 [0.54-0.77]NS
LSCR101.54 [1.37-1.67]1.23 [1.15-1.39]< 0.0011.54 [1.37-1.67]1.29 [1,15-1.51]0.014
LSCR201.68 [1.53-1.84]1.35 [1.20-1.57]0.0031.68 [1.53-1.84]1.37 [1.26-1.74]0.036
LMCR102.41 [2.12-2.83]2.06 [1.75-2.45]0.0062.41 [2.12-2.83]1.88 [1.76-2.50]0.034
LMCR202.49 [2.24-2.96]1.95 [1.77-2.39]0.0052.49 [2.24-2.96]1.92 [1.78-2.6]0.036
LKCR101.15 [0.98-1.34]0.93 [0.81-1.13]0.0011.15 [0.98-1.34]1.01 [0.84-1.21]0.032
LKCR201.25 [1.16-1.43]0.98 [0.88-1.28]0.0011.25 [1.16-1.43]1.05 [0.88-1.03]0.017
CEI101.46 [1.34-1.59]1.36 [1.26-1.52]NS1.46 [1.34-1.59]1.47 [1.31-1.58]NS
CEI201.50 [1.38-1.71]1.41 [1.24-1.54]NS1.50 [1.38-1.71]1.48 [1.33-1.65]NS
HUI10609.7 [501.4-970.3]327.8 [191.7-511.8]0.004609.7 [501.4-970.3]411.4 [223.4-1210.7]NS
HUI20803.6 [678.7-1091.2]450.5 [274.8-864.4]0.033803.6 [678.7-1091.2]569.0 [341.8-987.1]NS

Quantitative parameters evaluating the liver uptake in the 20 minutes hepatobiliary phase (HPB) of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) according to the quality of the HBP_ In one patient the HBP at 20 minutes was not available (n = 61)_ Variables described as median and interquartile range

INDEXQualitative assessment adequateQualitative assessment Non-adequateP value
N4912
RLE200.68 [0.57-0.83]0.40 [0.31-0.51]< 0.001
LSCR201.53 [1.34-1.78]1.19 [1.06-1.22]< 0.001
LMCR202.34 [1.88-2.78]1.91 [1.50-2.11]0.002
LKCR201.20 [0.95-1.35]0.89 [0.78-0.98]0.001
CEI201.23 [1.09-1.32]1.00 [0.90-1.10]0.001
HUI20744.1 [444.8-1024.1]251.5 [65-4-331.0]< 0.001

Formulas used for qualitative assessment of liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HPB)

FormulaVariables definition
Relative Liver Enhancement (RLE) RLE10=( LSI10  LSIPRE)  LSIPRE  $RLE10=\frac{(\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }-\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE) }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$RLE10 and RLE20: RLE at 10- and 20-min HBP
RLE20=( LSI20 - LSIPRE ) LSIPRE  $RLE20=\frac{(\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI20 - LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ })}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$LSIpre, LSI10 and LSI20: Liver signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20-min HBP, respectively
Liver to Spleen Contrast Ratio (LSCR) LSCRpre= LSIPRE  SSIPRE  $LSCRpre\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ SSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$LSCRpre LSCR10 and LSCR20r: LSCR pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
LSCR10=LSI10SSI10 $LSCR10=\frac{\text{LSI}10}{\text{SSI}10}$LSIpre, LSI10 and LSI20: Liver signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
LSCR20 = LSI20  SSI20  $LSCR\text{20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ SSI20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$SSIpre, SSI10 and SSI20: Spleen signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
Liver to muscle Contrast Ratio (LMCR) LMCRpre= LSIPRE  MSIPRE  $LMCRpre\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ MSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$LMCRpre, LMCR10 and LMCR20r: LMCR pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
LMCR10=LSI10MSI10 $LMCR10=\frac{\text{LSI}10}{\text{MSI}10}$LSIpre, LSI10 and LSI20: Liver signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
LMCR20 =LSI20MSI20 $LMCR\text{20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{LSI}20}{\text{MSI}20}$MSIpre, MSI10 and MSI20: Muscle signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
Liver to Kidney Contrast Ratios (LKCR) LKCRpre= LSIPRE  KSIPRE  $LKCRpre\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ KSIPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$LKCR LKCR and LKCR: LKCR pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively pre, 10 20r
LKCR10= LSI10  KSI10  $LKCR10=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ KSI10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$LSIpre, LSI10 and LSI20: Liver signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
LKCR20 = LSI20  KSI20  $LKCR\text{20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ KSI20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$KSIpre, KSI10 and KSI20: Kidney signal intensity pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
Contrast Enhancement Index (CEI) CEI10 =LMCR10  LMCRPRE  $\text{CEI10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }LMCR\text{10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LMCRPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$- LMCRpre, LMCR10 and LMCR20r: LMCR pre-contrast, at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
CEI20 =LMCR20 LMCRPRE  $\text{CEI20 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }=\frac{LMCR20}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LMCRPRE }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}$- CEI10 and CEI20: Contrast Enhancement Index at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
Hepatic Uptake index (HUI) HUI10=VOLLIVER ( LSI10  SSI10)1 $\text{HU}{{\text{I}}_{10}}=\text{VO}{{\text{L}}_{\text{LIVER }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}}\left( \frac{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ LSI10 }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}{\text{ }\!\!~\!\!\text{ SSI10}} \right)-1$- HUI10 and HUI20: Hepatic Uptake index at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
HUL20=VOLLIVER (512058120)=1 $\text{HU}{{\text{L}}_{20}}=\text{VO}{{\text{L}}_{\text{LIVER }\!\!~\!\!\text{ }}}\left( \frac{5120}{58120} \right)=1$LSI10 and LSI20: Liver signal intensity at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively
SSI10 and SSI20: Spleen signal intensity at 10- and 20- min HBP, respectively

Quantitative assessment of liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) during the hepatobiliary phase (HPB) at 10 and 20 minutes considering the degree of liver function impairment according to Child-Pugh classification_ Variables described as median and interquartile range

INDEXStudy groupChild-Pugh AChild-Pugh BP valueChild-Pugh A-5 pointsChild-Pugh A-6 points + BP value
N62539 4418
RLE100.65 [0.49-0.75]0.68 [0.51-0.81]0.41 [0.30-0.52]<0.0010.68 [0.52-0.82]0.50 [0.40-0.58]0.005
RLE200.63 [0.51-0.78]0.67 [0.55-0.82]0.41 [0.30-0.52]<0.0010.68 [0.56-0.83]0.52 [0.40-0.61]0.006
LSCR101.32 [1.17-1.55]1.35 [1.11-1.59]1.20 [0.99-1.28]0.0161.43 [1.19-1.61]1.20 [1,11-1.28]0.001
LSCR201.48 [1.23-1.71]1.51 [1.30-1.80]1.20 [1.01-1.43]0.0061.54 [1.32-1.81]1.25 [1.17-1.53]0.008
LMCR102.14 [1.78-2.51]2.16 [1.81-2.62]1.78 [1.52-2.13]0.0302.26 [1.81-2.71]2.08 [1.73-2.16]NS
LMCR202.25 [1.86-2.63]2.29 [1.89-2.69]1.79 [1.52-2.23]0.0302.34 [1.88-2.70]2.05 [1.75-2.31]NS
LKCR101.02 [0.85-1.17]1.04 [0.89-1.21]0.83 [0.74-0.90]0.0051.06 [0.91-1.25]0.87 [0.76-1.05]0.008
LKCR201.14 [0.90-1.13]1.19 [0.96-1.33]0.89 [0.80-0.96]0.0091.20 [0.96-1.38]0.91 [0.81-1.22]0.012
CEI101.39 [1.27-1.57][1.341.43 -1.1.58]1.26 [1.22-1.32]0.0061.47 [1.34-1.58]1.33 [1.25-1.38]0.003
CEI201.43 [1.30-1.61]1.45 [1.35-1.63]1.32 [1.19-1.37]0.0071.50 [1.39-1.66]1.35 [1.19-1.42]0.001
HUI10407.3 [223.7-640.9]486.2 [235.3-845.4]312.4 [-3.31- 400]0.022522.4 [284.9-1036.4]265.7 [130.5-383.7]<0.001
HUI20660.5 [301.5-956.5]697.8 [367.1-1028.9]265 [72.5-620.4]0.009720.1 [450.5-1062.4]327.2 [198.1-772.2]0.004

Quantitative assessment of liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) during hepatobiliary phase (HPB) at 10 minutes in patients with normal liver (control group) compared with all Child-Pugh (CP) A 5 points patients (left panel) and with patients Child-Pugh A 5 points patients without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH)_ Variables described as median and interquartile range

INDEXControl groupChild-Pugh A-5 pointsP valueControl groupNo CSPH (all CP A-5 points)P value
N2044 2019
RLE101.06 [0.82-2.16]0.68 [0.52-0.82]< 0.0011.06 [0.82-2.16]0.73 [0.52-0.89]< 0.001
LSCR102,27 [2.06-2.88]1.43 [1.19-1.61]< 0.0012,27 [2.06-2.88]1.54 [1.37-1.67]< 0.001
LMCR103.11 [2.90-3.55]2.26 [1.81-2.71]< 0.0013.11 [2.90-3.55]2.41 [2.12-2.83]< 0.001
LKCR101.82 [1.51-1.99]1.06 [0.91-1.25]< 0.0011.82 [1.51-1.99]1.15 [0.98-1.34]< 0.001
CEI101.71 [1.55-1.85]1.47 [1.34-1.58]0.0011.71 [1.55-1.85]1.46 [1.34-1.59]0.007
HUI101449.6 [1259-1717.7]522.4 [284.9-1036.4]< 0.0011449.6 [1259-1717.7]609.7 [501.4-970.3]< 0.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0024 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 292 - 302
Submitted on: Feb 4, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2022
Published on: Aug 14, 2022
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Carla Caparroz, Alejandro Forner, Jordi Rimola, Anna Darnell, Ángeles García-Criado, Juan Ramón Ayuso, María Reig, Jordi Bruix, Carmen Ayuso, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.