Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Image reconstruction using small-voxel size improves small lesion detection for positron emission tomography Cover

Image reconstruction using small-voxel size improves small lesion detection for positron emission tomography

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Derlin T, Grünwald V, Steinbach J, Wester HJ, Ross TL. Molecular imaging in oncology using positron emission tomography. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 175-81. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0175
  2. Simianu VV, Varghese TK, Flanagan MR, Flum DR, Shankaran V, Oelschlager BK, et al. Positron emission tomography for initial staging of esophageal cancer among medicare beneficiaries. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7: 395402. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2015.10.03
  3. Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, Mottaghy FM, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 571-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305
  4. Schöder H, Erdi YE, Larson SM, Yeung HWD. PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 1419-37. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1299-6
  5. Townsend DW. Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 938-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051276
  6. Kolthammer JA, Su KH, Grover A, Narayanan M, Jordan DW, Muzic RF. Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59: 3843-59. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3843
  7. Conti M. Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38: 1147-57. doi: 10.1007/ s00259-010-1711-y
  8. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 42: 328-54. doi: 10.1007/ s00259-014-2961-x
  9. van der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, Arends AJ, Boellaard R, van Dalen JA, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44(Suppl 1): 4-16. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3727-z
  10. Fukui MB, Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC. PET/CT imaging in recurrent head and neck cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003; 24: 157-63. doi: 10.1016/ s0887-2171(03)90037-0
  11. Tarantola G, Zito F, Gerundini P. PET instrumentation and reconstruction algorithms in whole-body applications. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 2003; 44: 756-69. PMID: 12732678
  12. Li CY, Klohr S, Sadick H, Weiss C, Hoermann K, Schoenberg SO, et al. Effect of time-of-flight technique on the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med Technol 2014; 42: 181-7. doi: 10.2967/ jnmt.114.141192
  13. Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Lagerweij MCM, Arkies H, de Boer J, Oostdijk AHJ, et al. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions. J Nucl Med Technol 2015; 43: 21-7. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.114.147215
  14. Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Arkies H, Oostdijk AHJ, Francken AB, Bart J, et al. Diagnostic implications of a small-voxel reconstruction for loco-regional lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using FDG-PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8: 3. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0359-7
  15. Petranović Ovčariček P, Giovanella L, Carrió Gasset I, Hindié E, Huellner MW, Luster M, et al. The EANM practice guidelines for parathyroid imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48: 2801-22. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05334-y
  16. Guedj E, Varrone A, Boellaard R, Albert NL, Barthel H, van Berckel B, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49: 632-51. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05603-w
  17. Øen SK, Aasheim LB, Eikenes L, Karlberg AM. Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems-a phantom study. EJNMMI Phys 2019; 6: 16. 10.1186/s40658-019-0251-1
  18. Adler S, Seidel J, Choyke P, Knopp MV, Binzel K, Zhang J, et al. Minimum lesion detectability as a measure of PET system performance. EJNMMI Phys 2017; 4: 13. doi: 10.1186/s40658-017-0179-2
  19. Jakoby BW, Bercier Y, Conti M, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Townsend DW. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 2375-89. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/8/004
  20. Meechai T, Tepmongkol S, Pluempitiwiriyawej C. Partial-volume effect correction in positron emission tomography brain scan image using super-resolution image reconstruction. Br J Radiol 2015; 88(1046): 20140119. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140119
  21. Lee YS, Kim JS, Kim KM, Kang JH, Lim SM, Kim H-J. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med 2014; 28: 340-8. doi: 10.1007/ s12149-014-0815-z
  22. Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 237-45. doi: 10.2967/ jnumed.109.068098
  23. Rogasch JM, Steffen IG, Hofheinz F, Großer OS, Furth C, Mohnike K, et al. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases. EJNMMI Res 2015; 5: 31. doi: 10.1186/ s13550-015-0111-5.
  24. Akamatsu G, Ishikawa K, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Ohya N, Baba S, et al. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters. J Nucl Med 2012; 53: 1716-22. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103861
  25. Treglia G, Piccardo A, Imperiale A, Strobel K, Kaufmann PA, Prior JO, et al. Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46: 751-65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 142 - 149
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2022
Published on: Apr 13, 2022
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2022 Sebastijan Rep, Petra Tomse, Luka Jensterle, Leon Jarabek, Katja Zaletel, Luka Lezaic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.