Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy Cover

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy

Open Access
|Nov 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Positive reaction was defined as p16 brown signal and Ki-67 red signal (red arrow) present in the same cell with red stained nucleus and brown stained cytoplasm. Note: negative p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) reaction (black arrow) (p16/Ki-76 DS, magnification 400x).

Table 1

p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positivity and number of positive cells among different smear results

0 (Negative)1234≥ 51+ (Total Positive)
Normal70 (69.3)13 (12.9)9 (8.9)1 (1.0)1 (1.0)7 (6.9)31 (30.7)101
ASC-US14 (58.3)0 (0.0)1 (4.2)2 (8.3)1 (4.2)6 (25.0)10 (41.7)24
LSIL7 (50.0)3 (21.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)3 (21.4)7 (50.0)14
AGC-N0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (100.0)1 (100.0)1
HSIL0 (0.0)1 (3.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)28 (96.6)29 (100.0)29
ASC-H0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1(25.0)0 (0.0)3 (75.0)4 (100.0)4
Inv. cancer0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1(100.0)1 (100.0)1
Total91 (52.3)17 (9.8)10 (5.7)4 (2.3)3 (1.7)49 (28.2)83 (47.7)174

[i] ASC-H = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; AGC-N = atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified; ASC-US = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HSIL = high-grade intraepithelial lesion; LSIL = low-grade intraepithelial lesion

Figure 2

The association between the number of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positive cells and the risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). Observed values are marked as points. Smoothed line (Method spline) is added for better trend representation.

Table 2

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) according to the number of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positive cells

p16/Ki-67Histology
Positive cellsn< CIN2 n (%)CIN2+ n (%)
09186 (94.5)5 (5.5)
11715 (88.2)2 (11.8)
21010 (100.0)0 (0.0)
343 (75.0)1 (25.0)
432 (66.7)1 (33.3)
≥ 54916 (32.7)33 (67.3)
Total174132 (75.9)42 (24.1)
Table 3

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) according to cytology results and according to different cut-offs (number of positive cells) in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+)

Sensitivity (%, 95% CI)Specificity (%, 95% CI)PPV† (%, 95% CI)NPV‡ (%, 95% CI)
Cytology result
Negative66.770.46.598.6
(n = 101)3(9.4–99.2)(60.3–79.2)(0.8–21.4)(92.3–100.0)
ASC-US650.061.130.078.6
(n = 24)(11.8–88.2)(35.7–82.7)(6.7–65.2)(49.2–95.3)
LSIL250.050.014.385.7
(n = 14)(1.3–98.7)(21.1–78.9)(0.4–57.9)(42.1–99.6)
HSIL100.00.089.7
(n = 29)26(86.8–100.0)(0.0–70.8)(72.6–97.8)/
Number of positive p16/Ki-67 cells cut-off
1+88.165.244.694.5
(n = 174)42(74.4–96.0)(56.4–73.2)(33.7–55.9)(87.6–98.2)
2+4283.376.553.093.5
(n = 174)(68.6–93.0)(68.4–83.5)(40.3–65.4)(87.1–97.4)
3+4283.384.162.594.1
(n = 174)(68.6–93.0)(76.7–89.9)(48.5–75.1)(88.2–97.6)
4+4281.086.465.493.4
(n = 174)(65.9–91.4)(79.3–91.7)(50.9–78.0)(87.5–97.1)
5+78.687.967.392.8
(n = 174)42(63.2–89.7)(81.1–92.9)(52.5–80.1)(86.8–96.7)

[i] †positive predictive value; ‡negative predictive value; ASC-US = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HSIL = high-grade intraepithelial lesion; LSIL = low-grade intraepithelial lesion; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value

Figure 3

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) at different cut-offs (number of positive cells).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0043 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 426 - 432
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2021
Published on: Nov 19, 2021
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Ursula Salobir Gajsek, Andraz Dovnik, Iztok Takac, Urska Ivanus, Tine Jerman, Simona Sramek Zatler, Alenka Repse Fokter, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.