Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy Cover

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy

Open Access
|Nov 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Positive reaction was defined as p16 brown signal and Ki-67 red signal (red arrow) present in the same cell with red stained nucleus and brown stained cytoplasm. Note: negative p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) reaction (black arrow) (p16/Ki-76 DS, magnification 400x).
Positive reaction was defined as p16 brown signal and Ki-67 red signal (red arrow) present in the same cell with red stained nucleus and brown stained cytoplasm. Note: negative p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) reaction (black arrow) (p16/Ki-76 DS, magnification 400x).

Figure 2

The association between the number of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positive cells and the risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). Observed values are marked as points. Smoothed line (Method spline) is added for better trend representation.
The association between the number of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positive cells and the risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). Observed values are marked as points. Smoothed line (Method spline) is added for better trend representation.

Figure 3

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) at different cut-offs (number of positive cells).
Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) at different cut-offs (number of positive cells).

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) according to the number of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positive cells

p16/Ki-67Histology

Positive cellsn< CIN2 n (%)CIN2+ n (%)
09186 (94.5)5 (5.5)
11715 (88.2)2 (11.8)
21010 (100.0)0 (0.0)
343 (75.0)1 (25.0)
432 (66.7)1 (33.3)
≥ 54916 (32.7)33 (67.3)
Total174132 (75.9)42 (24.1)

Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) according to cytology results and according to different cut-offs (number of positive cells) in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+)

CIN2+(n)p16/Ki-67
Sensitivity (%, 95% CI)Specificity (%, 95% CI)PPV† (%, 95% CI)NPV‡ (%, 95% CI)
Cytology result
Negative 66.770.46.598.6
(n = 101)3(9.4–99.2)(60.3–79.2)(0.8–21.4)(92.3–100.0)
ASC-US650.061.130.078.6
(n = 24) (11.8–88.2)(35.7–82.7)(6.7–65.2)(49.2–95.3)
LSIL250.050.014.385.7
(n = 14) (1.3–98.7)(21.1–78.9)(0.4–57.9)(42.1–99.6)
HSIL 100.00.089.7
(n = 29)26(86.8–100.0)(0.0–70.8)(72.6–97.8)/
Number of positive p16/Ki-67 cells cut-off
1+ 88.165.244.694.5
(n = 174)42(74.4–96.0)(56.4–73.2)(33.7–55.9)(87.6–98.2)
2+4283.376.553.093.5
(n = 174) (68.6–93.0)(68.4–83.5)(40.3–65.4)(87.1–97.4)
3+4283.384.162.594.1
(n = 174) (68.6–93.0)(76.7–89.9)(48.5–75.1)(88.2–97.6)
4+4281.086.465.493.4
(n = 174) (65.9–91.4)(79.3–91.7)(50.9–78.0)(87.5–97.1)
5+ 78.687.967.392.8
(n = 174)42(63.2–89.7)(81.1–92.9)(52.5–80.1)(86.8–96.7)

p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (p16/Ki-67 DS) positivity and number of positive cells among different smear results

Cervical cytologyNumber of p16/Ki-67 positive cells (n, [%])
Total
0 (Negative)1234≥ 51+ (Total Positive)
Normal70 (69.3)13 (12.9)9 (8.9)1 (1.0)1 (1.0)7 (6.9)31 (30.7)101
ASC-US14 (58.3)0 (0.0)1 (4.2)2 (8.3)1 (4.2)6 (25.0)10 (41.7)24
LSIL7 (50.0)3 (21.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)3 (21.4)7 (50.0)14
AGC-N0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (100.0)1 (100.0)1
HSIL0 (0.0)1 (3.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)28 (96.6)29 (100.0)29
ASC-H0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1(25.0)0 (0.0)3 (75.0)4 (100.0)4
Inv. cancer0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1(100.0)1 (100.0)1
Total91 (52.3)17 (9.8)10 (5.7)4 (2.3)3 (1.7)49 (28.2)83 (47.7)174
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0043 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 426 - 432
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2020
|
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2021
|
Published on: Nov 19, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Ursula Salobir Gajsek, Andraz Dovnik, Iztok Takac, Urska Ivanus, Tine Jerman, Simona Sramek Zatler, Alenka Repse Fokter, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.