Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The role of haematological parameters in predicting the response to radical chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal squamous cell cancer Cover

The role of haematological parameters in predicting the response to radical chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal squamous cell cancer

Open Access
|Oct 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for the whole patient group.
Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for the whole patient group.

Figure 2

(A) Kaplan-Meier plots for Disease-free survival (DFS), (B) progression-free survival (PFS), and (C) overall survival (OS) in relation to response to treatment after 6 months.
(A) Kaplan-Meier plots for Disease-free survival (DFS), (B) progression-free survival (PFS), and (C) overall survival (OS) in relation to response to treatment after 6 months.

Figure 3

Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve for the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in relation to response to treatment after 6 months.
Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve for the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in relation to response to treatment after 6 months.

Results of the ROC analysis for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and relevant events

CharacteristicsNLRPLR
AUC ROCa (95% CI)65.2% (45.3–85.2%)76.2% (59.5–92.9%)
Likelihood ratio testbnsp < 0.05
ROC-cut-off valuec-145.2
Sensitivity (95% CI)-68.7% (43.7–87.5%)
Specificity (95% CI)-75.0% (56.1–93.7%)

Patients’ disease, treatment and outcomes characteristics

CharacteristicsN (%)CharacteristicsN (%)
Age (years) NLR
    Mean (SD)61.9 (10.0)    Mean (SD)2.7 (1.7)
    Median (Range)63.0 (40.0–81.0)    Median (Range)2.1 (0.8–7.0)
Gender PLR
    Female36 (76.6%)    Mean (SD)159.4 (92.1)
    Male11 (23.4%)    Median (Range)132.9 (51.7–401.2)
Performance status (PS)1 RT technique
    ECOG 013 (27.7%)2D23 (48.9%)
    ECOG 133 (70.2%)3D24 (51.1%)
    ECOG 21 (2.1%)The first RT part-dose (Gy)
T in clinical TNM     Mean (SD)36.1 (1.6)
    T218 (38.3%)    Median (Range)36 (30–45)
    T324 (51.1%)The second RT part-dose (Gy)
    T45 (10.6%)    Mean (SD)22.8 (2.5)
N in clinical TNM     Median (Range)23.4 (9–26)
    N017 (36.2%)Total dose (Gy)
    N130 (63.8%)    Mean (SD)58.9 (1.6)
UICC staging     Median (Range)59.4 (52–59.4)
    IIA10 (21.3%)OTT (days)
    IIB7 (14.9%)    Mean (SD)74.7 (14.2)
    IIIA8 (17.0%)    Median (Range)77 (51–134)
    IIIC22 (46.8%)Acute toxicity-first part
Tumour differentiation     Without or gr. I/II26 (55.3%)
    well24 (51.1%)    Grade III/IV21 (44.7%)
    moderate13 (27.7%)Acute toxicity-second part
    poor4 (8.5%)    Without or gr. I/II32 (68.1%)
    without data6 (12.8%)    Grade III/IV15 (31.9%)
Tumour size (cm) Tumour response at 6 months
    Mean (SD)5.2 (2.0)    CR30 (63.8%)
    Median (Range)5.4 (2.1–10.0)    PR15 (31.9%)
Initial haemoglobin level (g/L)     SD1 (2.1%)
    Mean (SD)116.3 (20.3)    PD1 (2.1%)
    Median (Range)124 (66–154)Follow-up period (months)
Pretreatment colostomy     Mean (SD)53.0 (30.9)
    No42 (89.4%)    Median (Range)44 (11–136)
    Yes5 (10.6%)Total47 (100%)

Comparison of characteristics of complete responders (CR) and non-complete responders (non-CR) to chemoradiotherapy

CharacteristicThe response to treatment after 6 months
CRnon-CRrank Wilcoxon sum test
Age (years)
    Mean (SD)60 (10.7)65.1 (7.8)ns
    Median (Range)59.5 (40.0–80.0)65.0 (52.0–81.0)
Gender
    Male6 (20%)5 (29.4%)ns*
    Female24 (80%)12 (70.6%)
T in clinical TNM
    T213 (43.3%)5 (29.4%)
    T314 (46.7%)10 (58.2%)ns#
    T43 (10.0%)2 (11.8%)
N in clinical TNM
    N015 (50.0%)2 (11.8%)
    N115 (50.0%)15 (88.2%)p* < 0.05
Tumour size (cm)
    Mean (SD)4.7 (1.8)6.0 (2.1)p < 0.05
    Median (Range)4.9 (2.1–8.0)5.8 (2.3–10.0)
Initial haemoglobin level (g/L)
    Mean (SD)124.2 (16.9)103.0 (18.8)p < 0.01
    Median (Range)127.0 (66.0–154.0)101.0 (68.0–132.0)
Pretreatment colostomy
    No28 (93.3%)14 (82.3%)
    Yes2 (6.7%)3 (17.6%)ns#
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
    N (%)16/30 (50%)16/17 (50%)
    Mean (SD)2.4 (1.8)3.1 (1.6)ns
    Median (Range)1.9 (0.8–7.0)3.2 (0.9–5.6)
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
    N (%)16/30 (50%)16/17 (50%)
    Mean (SD)118.3 (54.9)200.5 (104.4)
    Median (Range)108.3 (51.7–256.6)158.9 (79.5–401.2)p < 0.05
DFS (months)
    Median (95% CI)NRNRp$ < 0.05
PFS (months)
    Median (95% CI)NR26 (> 17)p$ < 0.01
OS (months)
    Median (95% CI)NR71 (> 33)p$ < 0.01
ACSOS (months)
    Median (95% CI)NRNRp$ < 0.05
CFS (months)
    Median (95% CI)NR11 (> 10)p$ < 0.01
Total30 (100%)17 (100%)-

The value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-tolymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prediction of CR vs_ non-CR

CharacteristicThe response to treatment after 6 months
CRnon-CRFisher Exact Test
NLR (literature cut-off value)
    < 3.013 (81.2%)7 (43.8%)
    ≥ 3.03 (18.8%)9 (56.2%)p = 0.06
PLR (literature cut-off value)
    < 160.013 (81.2%)9 (56.2%)
    ≥ 160.03 (18.8%)7 (43.8%)p = 0.25
PLR (ROC cut-off value)
    < 145.212 (75%)5 (31.3%)
    ≥ 145.24 (25%)11(68.7%)p = 0.03
Total16 (100%)16 (100%)-

Logistic regression analysis of the response to treatment after 6 months

CharacteristicLogistic regression
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)Wild testOR (95%CI)Likelihood Ratio test
Age
    > 63 y vs. ≤ 63 y1.7 (0.4–6.6)p = 0.213-p = 0.884
Gender
    Male vs. Female2.1 (0.6–7.2)p = 0.468-p = 0.082
T in clinical TNM
    T3 vs. T2 T4 vs. T21.9 (0.5–6.9) 1.7 (0.2–13.7)p = 0.634-p = 0.940
N in clinical TNM
    N1 vs. N07.5 (1.4–38.7)p = 0.006-p = 0.133
Tumour size (cm)
    > 4 cm vs. ≤ 4 cm6.6 (1.3–33.8)p = 0.011-p = 0.602
Initial haemoglobin level (g/L)
    < 120 g/L vs. ≥ 120 g/L8.9 (2.2–35.6)p = 0.00113.4 (2.4–74.3)p* = 0.003
RT technique
    2D vs. 3D1.3 (0.4–4.2)p = 0.679-p = 0.784
Treatment break
    > 10 days vs. ≤ 10 days6.0 (1.6–22.3)p = 0.0059.6 (1.7–52.5)p* = 0.009
Completed chemotherapy
    No vs. Yes2.0 (0.4–9.3)p = 0.379-p = 0.555
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0039 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 449 - 458
Submitted on: May 18, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jul 16, 2021
|
Published on: Oct 8, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Suzana Stojanovic-Rundic, Mladen Marinkovic, Milena Cavic, Vesna Plesinac Karapandzic, Dusica Gavrilovic, Radmila Jankovic, Richarda M. de Voer, Sergi Castellvi-Bel, Zoran Krivokapic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.