Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can dynamic imaging, using 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT perfusion differentiate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules? Cover

Can dynamic imaging, using 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT perfusion differentiate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules?

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Furtado CD, Aguirre DA, Sirlin CB, Dang D, Stamato SK, Lee P, et al. Whole-body CT screening: spectrum of findings and recommendations in 1192 patients. Radiology 2005; 237: 385-94. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041741
  2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277-84. doi: 10.1056/nejmra072149
  3. Callister MEJ, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, et al. British thoracic society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015; 70: ii1-54. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207168
  4. Shinohara S, Hanagiri T, Takenaka M, Chikaishi Y, Oka S, Shimokawa H, et al. Evaluation of undiagnosed solitary lung nodules according to the probability of malignancy in the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Radiol Oncol 2014; 48: 50-5. doi: 10.2478/ raon-2013-0064
  5. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017; 284: 228-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161659
  6. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG, Doi K. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 2002; 225: 673-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2253011375
  7. Joo HO, Ie RY, Sung HK, Hyung SS, Soo KC. Clinical significance of small pulmonary nodules with little or no 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images of patients with nonthoracic malignancies. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 15-21.
  8. Chen S, Harmon S, Perk T, Li X, Chen M, Li Y, et al. Diagnostic classification of solitary pulmonary nodules using dual time 18F-FDG PET/CT image texture features in granuloma-endemic regions. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 9370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08764-7
  9. Wilson R, Devaraj A. Radiomics of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6: 86-91. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.01.04
  10. Hawkins S, Wang H, Liu Y, Garcia A, Stringfield O, Krewer H, et al. Predicting malignant nodules from screening CT scans. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 21208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.002
  11. Xu Y, Lu L, Lin-Ning E, Lian W, Yang H, Schwartz LH, et al. Application of radiomics in predicting the malignancy of pulmonary nodules in different sizes. Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213: 1213-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21490
  12. Ather S, Kadir T, Gleeson F. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in pulmonary nodule management: current status and future applications. Clin Radiol 2020; 75: 13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.017
  13. Khawaja A, Bartholmai BJ, Rajagopalan S, Karwoski RA, Varghese C, Maldonado F, et al. Do we need to see to believe? – radiomics for lung nodule classification and lung cancer risk stratification. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12: 3303-16. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.105
  14. Feng B, Chen X, Chen Y, Liu K, Li K, Liu X, et al. Radiomics nomogram for preoperative differentiation of lung tuberculoma from adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary solid nodule. Eur J Radiol 2020; 128: 109022. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109022
  15. Palumbo B, Bianconi F, Palumbo I, Fravolini ML, Minestrini M, Nuvoli S, et al. Value of shape and texture features from 18F-FDG PET/CT to discriminate between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: an experimental evaluation. Diagnostics 2020; 10: 696. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090696
  16. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Yip R, Reeves AP, Farooqi A, Xu D, et al. Lung cancers diagnosed at annual CT screening: volume doubling times. Radiology 2012; 263: 578-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12102489
  17. Koroscil MT, Bowman MH, Morris MJ, Skabelund AJ, Hersh AM. Effect of a pulmonary nodule fact sheet on patient anxiety and knowledge: a quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Qual 2018; 7: e000437. doi: 10.1136/ bmjoq-2018-000437
  18. Slatore CG, Wiener RS, Golden SE, Au DH, Ganzini L. Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13: 1983-91. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-555OC
  19. Cronin P, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Carlos RC. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. Radiology 2008; 246: 772-82. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2463062148
  20. Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JAO. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W678-82. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4659
  21. Huang MD, Weng HH, Hsu SL, Hsu LS, Lin WM, Chen CW, et al. Accuracy and complications of CT-guided pulmonary core biopsy in small nodules: a single-center experience. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19: 51. doi: 10.1186/ s40644-019-0240-6
  22. Folkman J. How is blood vessel growth regulated in normal and neoplastic tissue? – G. H. A. clowes memorial award lecture. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 46773. PMID: 2416426
  23. Cavalcanti PG, Shirani S, Scharcanski J, Fong C, Meng J, Castelli J, et al. Lung nodule segmentation in chest computed tomography using a novel background estimation method. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016; 6: 16-24. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2016.02.06
  24. Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H, Seki S, Tsubakimoto M, Fujisawa Y, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2015; 274: 563-75. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.14132289
  25. Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H, Miura S, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto S, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for pulmonary nodule assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: 515-29. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11888
  26. Huang YE, Lu HI, Liu FY, Huang YJ, Lin MC, Chen CF, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules differentiated by dynamic F-18 FDG PET in a region with high prevalence of granulomatous disease. J Radiat Res 2012; 53: 306-12. doi: 10.1269/jrr.11089
  27. Yuan X, Zhang J, Quan C, Cao J, Ao G, Tian Y, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2469-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2842-x
  28. Ohno Y, Koyama H, Fujisawa Y, Yoshikawa T, Seki S, Sugihara N, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion area detector CT for non-small cell lung cancer patients: influence of mathematical models on early prediction capabilities for treatment response and recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.009
  29. Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H, Fujisawa Y, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto S, et al. Comparison of quantitatively analyzed dynamic area-detector CT using various mathematic methods with FDG PET/CT in management of solitary pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: W593-602. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.12.9197
  30. Karakatsanis NA, Lodge MA, Tahari AK, Zhou Y, Wahl RL, Rahmim A. Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58: 7391-418. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7391
  31. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Strauss LG. Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients. Cancer Imaging 2012; 12: 283-9. doi: 10.1102/14707330.2012.0033
  32. Yi CA, Kyung SL, Kim BT, Joon YC, Kwon OJ, Kim H, et al. Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 443-50. PMID: 16513614
  33. Ohno Y, Koyama H, Matsumoto K, Onishi Y, Takenaka D, Fujisawa Y, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with quantitative first-pass 320-detector row perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2011; 258: 599-609. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100245
  34. Mirsadraee S, Reid JH, Connell M, MacNee W, Hirani N, Murchison JT, et al. Dynamic (4D) CT perfusion offers simultaneous functional and anatomical insights into pulmonary embolism resolution. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 188390. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.018
  35. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983; 3:1-7. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1
  36. Evangelista L, Cuocolo A, Pace L, Mansi L, Del Vecchio S, Miletto P, et al. Performance of FDG-PET/CT in solitary pulmonary nodule based on pre-test likelihood of malignancy: results from the ITALIAN retrospective multicenter trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45: 1898-907. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4016-1
  37. Weir-McCall JR, Harris S, Miles KA, Qureshi NR, Rintoul RC, Dizdarevic S, et al. Impact of solitary pulmonary nodule size on qualitative and quantitative assessment using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: the SPUTNIK trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; [Ahead of print] doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05089-y
  38. Sim YT, Poon FW. Imaging of solitary pulmonary nodule-a clinical review. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2013; 3: 316-26. doi: 10.3978/j. issn.2223-4292.2013.12.08
  39. Ambrosini V, Nicolini S, Caroli P, Nanni C, Massaro A, Marzola MC, et al. PET/ CT imaging in different types of lung cancer: an overview. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 988-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.020
  40. Chen CJ, Lee BF, Yao WJ, Cheng L, Wu PS, Ching LC, et al. Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 475-9. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.07.3457
  41. Cloran FJ, Banks KP, Song WS, Kim Y, Bradley YC. Limitations of dual time point PET in the assessment of lung nodules with low FDG avidity. Lung Cancer 2010; 68: 66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.05.013
  42. Chiu CH, Yeh YC, Lin KH, Wu YC, Lee YC, Chou TY, et al. Histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma have differential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptakes on the positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 1697-703. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318226b677
  43. Veronesi G, Bellomi M, Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Scanagatta P, et al. Role of positron emission tomography scanning in the management of lung nodules detected at baseline computed tomography screening. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 959-66. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.058
  44. Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K. Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. Lung Cancer 2004; 45: 19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.009
  45. Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: Correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1005-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741005
  46. Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim EA, Han J, Kim H, Kwon OJ, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Dynamic enhanced multi-detector row CT study and comparison with vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. Radiology 2004; 233: 191-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331031535
  47. Zhang M, Kono M. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Evaluation of blood flow patterns with dynamic CT. Radiology 1997; 205: 471-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356631
  48. Hornick JL, Fletcher CDM. PEComa: What do we know so far? Histopathology 2006; 48: 75-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02316.x
  49. Stallmann S, Fisseler-Eckhoff A. [Mesenchymal tumors of the lungs]. [German]. Pneumologe 2014; 12: 34-43. doi: 10.1007/s10405-014-0808-6
  50. Chakrabarti A, Bandyopadhyay M, Purkayastha B. Malignant perivascular epitheloid cell tumour (PEComa) of the lung-A rare entity. Innov Surg Sci 2020; 2: 39-42. doi: 10.1515/iss-2016-0032
  51. Kim WJ, Kim SR, Choe YH, Lee KY, Park SJ, Lee HB, et al. Clear cell “sugar”tumor of the lung: a well-enhanced mass with an early washout pattern on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Korean Med Sci 2008; 23: 1121-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.6.1121
  52. Suljic A, Tomse P, Jensterle L, Skrk D. The impact of reconstruction algorithms and time of flight information on PET/CT image quality. Radiol Oncol 2015; 49: 227-33. doi: 10.1515/raon-2015-0014
  53. Bhalla A, Das A, Naranje P, Irodi A, Raj V, Goyal A. Imaging protocols for CT chest: a recommendation. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2019; 29: 236. doi: 10.4103/ijri.ijri_34_19
  54. Dolde K, Naumann P, Dávid C, Kachelriess M, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, et al. Comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of various gating approaches for PBS proton therapy of pancreatic cancer using 4D-MRI datasets. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64: 085011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1175
  55. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin N Am 2009; 47: 27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006
  56. Qureshi NR, Rintoul RC, Miles KA, George S, Harris S, Madden J, et al. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules – The SPUtNIk study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2016; 3: e000156. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000156
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0024 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 259 - 267
Submitted on: Mar 26, 2021
|
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2021
|
Published on: May 31, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Aleksander Marin, John T. Murchison, Kristopher M. Skwarski, Adriana A.S. Tavares, Alison Fletcher, William A. Wallace, Vladka Salapura, Edwin J.R. van Beek, Saeed Mirsadraee, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.