References
- Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Taheri S, Salehiniya H. Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Womens Health 2019; 11: 287-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S197604
- Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips K-A, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 2017; 317: 2402-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112
- Neff RT, Senter L, Salani R. BRCA mutation in ovarian cancer: testing, implications and treatment considerations. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9: 519-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068
- Bast RC Jr. Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(10 Suppl): 200s-5s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068
- Yawn BP, Barrette BA, Wollan PC. Ovarian cancer: the neglected diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 1277-82. doi: 10.4065/79.10.1277
- Bottoni P, Scatena R. The role of CA 125 as tumor marker: biochemical and clinical aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 867: 229-44. doi: 10.1007/978-94017-7215-0_14
- Yang WL, Lu Z, Bast RC. The role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2017; 17: 577-91. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017
- Sundar S, Neal RD, Kehoe S. Diagnosis of ovarian cancer. BMJ 2015; 351: h4443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4443
- Elies A, Rivière S, Pouget N, Becette V, Dubot C, Donnadieu A, et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18: 555-66. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1458614
- du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 2009; 115: 1234-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24149
- Arab M, Jamdar F, Sadat Hosseini M, Ghodssi-Ghasemabadi R, Farzaneh F, Ashrafganjoie T. Model for prediction of optimal debulking of epithelial ovarian cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 1319-24. doi: 10.22034/ APJCP.2018.19.5.1319
- Vorgias G, Iavazzo C, Savvopoulos P, Myriokefalitaki E, Katsoulis M, Kalinoglou N, et al. Can the preoperative Ca-125 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? A single institution cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.020
- Kang S, Kim TJ, Nam BH, Seo SS, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. Preoperative serum CA-125 levels and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101: 13-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21398
- Chi DS, Zivanovic O, Palayekar MJ, Eisenhauer EL, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, et al. A contemporary analysis of the ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict primary cytoreductive outcome in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.010
- Rodriguez N, Rauh-Hain JA, Shoni M, Berkowitz RS, Muto MG, Feltmate C, et al. Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.006
- Pelissier A, Bonneau C, Chéreau E, de La Motte Rouge T, Fourchotte V, Daraï E, et al. CA125 kinetic parameters predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135: 542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.005
- Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Cliby WA, Coleman RL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3460-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6907
- Orr B, Edwards RP. Diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2018; 32: 943-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.010
- Eisenhauer EA. Real-world evidence in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2017; 28(Suppl 8): viii61-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx443
- Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 943-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806
- Schwartz PE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the management of ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 16: 585-96. doi: 10.1053/ beog.2002.0304
- Morice P, Dubernard G, Rey A, Atallah D, Pautier P, Pomel C, et al. Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 955-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.06.004
- Pecorelli S, Odicino F, Favalli G. Interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 16: 573-83. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0302
- Zeng J, Yin J, Song X, Jin Y, Li Y, Pan L. Reduction of CA125 levels during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can predict cytoreduction to no visible residual disease in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma. J Cancer 2016; 7: 2327-32. doi: 10.7150/jca.16761
- Mahdi H, Maurer KA, Nutter B, Rose PG. The impact of percent reduction in CA-125 levels on prediction of the extent of interval cytoreduction and outcome in patients with advanced-stage cancer of Müllerian origin treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 823-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000434
- Gupta M, Patel SM, Arora R, Tiwari R, Dave P, Desai A, et al. Does preoperative CA-125 cutoff value and percent reduction in CA-125 levels correlate with surgical and survival outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer? – Our experience from a tertiary cancer institute. South Asian J Cancer 2020; 9: 30. doi: 10.4103/sajc. sajc_53_17
- Kessous R, Wissing MD, Piedimonte S, Abitbol J, Kogan L, Laskov I, et al. CA-125 reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with success of cytoreductive surgery and outcome of patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 933-40. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13814
- Mueller JJ, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, O’Cearbhaill RE, Alvi FA, El Haraki A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140: 436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.008
- Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson GC, Kitchener H, Lopes T, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 249-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
- Mahner S, Trillsch F, Chi D, Harter P, Pfisterer J, Hilpert F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer revisited. Ann Oncol 2016; 27(Suppl 1): i30-2. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw092
- Machida H, Tokunaga H, Matsuo K, Matsumura N, Kobayashi Y, Tabata T, et al. Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 868-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.520
- du Bois A, Baert T, Vergote I. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 2398-405. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00022