Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Long-term toxicity and survival outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with centrally located thoracic tumors

Open Access
|Jun 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curves for locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS). (A) LRFS of all patients according to primary tumor type (colorectal cancer vs. others). (B) LRFS of all patients according to radiographic response 3 months after radiotherapy (complete response vs. no complete response). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.
Kaplan-Meier curves for locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS). (A) LRFS of all patients according to primary tumor type (colorectal cancer vs. others). (B) LRFS of all patients according to radiographic response 3 months after radiotherapy (complete response vs. no complete response). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS). (A) OS of all patients according to development of a grade 3 or higher toxicity (vs. not). (B) OS of all patients according to primary tumor type (lung cancer vs. others). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS). (A) OS of all patients according to development of a grade 3 or higher toxicity (vs. not). (B) OS of all patients according to primary tumor type (lung cancer vs. others). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.

Figure 3

Computed tomographic imaging examples of patients with a grade 3 or higher toxicity. (A) Patient with a tracheal rupture after reirradiation. (B) Patient with vocal cord paralysis after reirradiation (previous chest wall radiotherapy). The circled portion indicates the planning target volume.
Computed tomographic imaging examples of patients with a grade 3 or higher toxicity. (A) Patient with a tracheal rupture after reirradiation. (B) Patient with vocal cord paralysis after reirradiation (previous chest wall radiotherapy). The circled portion indicates the planning target volume.

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier Curves for grade 3 or higher toxicity-free survival (TFS). (A) TFS for all patients according to reirradiation vs. no reirradiation. (B) TFS for all patients according to the distance of the planning target volume from the tracheobronchial tree (> 1 cm or ≤ 1 cm). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.
Kaplan-Meier Curves for grade 3 or higher toxicity-free survival (TFS). (A) TFS for all patients according to reirradiation vs. no reirradiation. (B) TFS for all patients according to the distance of the planning target volume from the tracheobronchial tree (> 1 cm or ≤ 1 cm). Tick marks on lines indicate censored patients.

Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics for 65 patients (70 tumors) receiving stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

CharacteristicValue

Values are median (range) or No. of patients/tumors (%).

Age, year64 (2295)
Men50 (77)
Primary cancer
        Lung49 (70)
        Colorectal10 (14)
        Other (breast, gastric, melanoma, germ cell, RCC)11 (16)
Treatment indication
        Primary lung (medically inoperable T1–T2)12 (17)
        Relapse (primary lung and oligometastatic)24 (34)
        Oligometastatic34 (49)
Previous radiation to chest20 (29)
Tumor location
        ≤ 1 cm from tracheobronchial tree24 (34)
        > 1 cm but ≤ 2 cm from tracheobronchial tree12 (17)
        Lesions intersecting mediastinum22 (31)
        ≤ 1 cm from thoracic aorta12 (17)
Left laterality37 (53)
Lesion size (PTV), cc33.4 (7.3–461.5)
Total dose, Gy55 (30–60)
Dose per fraction, Gy9.75 (4–18)
Fractions5 (3–10)
BED10, Gy110 (48–151.2)
BED10
        < 100 Gy16 (23)
        ≥ 100 Gy54 (77)
BED3, Gy228 (90–378)
Treatment time, days10 (5–19)
Treatment time
< 10 days30 (43)
≥ 10 days40 (57)
Treatment on consecutive days6 (9)

Tumor and patient outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for central lung tumors

CharacteristicValue

Values are No. patients/tumors (%) or No. patients unless otherwise stated.

Response on 3-month PET/CT after SABR
        Complete response43 (61)
        Partial response19 (27)
        Progression2 (3)
        Unknown (patient died before 3 months or imaging not performed)6 (9)
Locoregional control
        2-year84%
        5-year70%
        MedianNot reached
Overall survival
        2-year52%
        5-year28%
        Median28 months
2-Year toxicity-free survival81%
        All Toxicities (grade 2 or higher)17 (26.2%)
        RT-induced pneumonitis9 (13.8%)
        Brachial and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury3 (4.6%)
        Esophagitis2 (3%)
        Tracheal perforation1 (1.5%)
        Fatal hemoptysis1 (1.5%)
        Possible RT-related death1 (1.5%)
Toxicity, grade 5 (fatal)5 (7.7%)
        RT-induced pneumonitis2 (3%)
        Tracheal perforation1 (1.5%)
        Fatal hemoptysis1 (1.5%)
        Possible RT-related death1 (1.5%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0039 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 480 - 487
Submitted on: Apr 2, 2020
Accepted on: May 30, 2020
Published on: Jun 26, 2020
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Banu Atalar, Teuta Zoto Mustafayev, Terence T. Sio, Bilgehan Sahin, Gorkem Gungor, Gokhan Aydın, Bulent Yapici, Enis Ozyar, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.