Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer: A comparative analysis of dosimetry for target volume and organs at risk Cover

Image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer: A comparative analysis of dosimetry for target volume and organs at risk

Open Access
|Nov 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Dosimetry of PTV

IGBTVMAT
Parametersn=38n=38p-value
mean S.Dmean S.D
V95 (%)92.1 3.098.4 0.9<0.05
V98 (%)90.2 3.290.4 3.7>0.05
V100 (%)89.0 3.476.7 8.9<0.05
D90 (%)98.6 4.798.2 0.8<0.05
D100 (%)58.6 9.087.0 3.2<0.05

[i] Abbreviations: S.D., standard deviation; PTV, planning target volume; IGBT, image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; n, number of patients for analysis; VX, relative volume of the PTV receiving at least X% of the PD; DX, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to X% of the PTV.

Table 2

Dosimetry of mandible and spinal cord

IGBTVMAT
Parametersp-value
meanS. DmeanS.D
Mandible, n=38
D0.1cm3 (%)77.017.285.47.9<0.05
D1cm3 (%)56.913.474.59.6<0.05
D2cm3 (%)48.412.268.49.5<0.05
Spinal cord, n=37*
D0.1cm3 (%)9.72.612.34.1<0.05
D1cm3 (%)6.82.010.83.7<0.05
D2cm3 (%)5.91.910.03.6<0.05

Abbreviations: S.D., standard deviation; IGBT, image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; n, number of patients for analysis; DXcm3, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to most exposed X cm3 of the organs.

* in one patient the spinal cord was not detected because it was excluded from the field-of-view of the CT scans.

Table 3

Dosimetry of parotid gland

IGBTVMAT
Parametersp-value
meanS.DmeanS. D
ipsilateral side (n=34*)
Dmean (%)4.61.44.62.6>0.05
D0.1cm3 (%)11.22.818.07.1<0.05
D1cm3 (%)8.12.112.96.3<0.05
D2cm3 (%)7.02.010.55.7<0.05
D10 (%)7.32.111.25.6<0.05
D30 (%)5.51.65.54.0>0.05
D50 (%)4.51.33.03.1<0.05
V10 (%)3.14.018.016.9<0.05
V30 (%)0.00.00.73.9N.A
V50 (%)0.00.00.10.5N.A
contralateral side (n=35**)
Dmean (%)3.00.93.92.1>0.05
D0.1cm3 (%)8.92.115.35.9<0.05
D1cm3 (%)5.91.610.85.9<0.05
D2cm3 (%)4.91.59.15.4<0.05
D10 (%)5.41.39.94.4<0.05
D30 (%)4.01.04.93.7>0.05
D50 (%)3.20.82.22.3<0.05
V10 (%)0.50.314.213.2<0.05
V30 (%)0.00.00.84.7N.A
V50 (%)0.00.00.21.3N.A

Abbreviations: S.D., standard deviation; IGBT, image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; n, number of patients for analysis; Dmean, mean relative dose of the PD delivered to the organs; DXcm3, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to most exposed X cm3 of the organs; DX, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to X% of the organs; VX, relative volume of the organs receiving at least X% of the PD; N.A., not available.

* in one patient the parotid gland was not detected because it was excluded from the field-of-view of the CT scans, and in three patients parotid glands were not evaluated because of central implantation.

** three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

Table 4

Dosimetry of submandibular gland

IGBTVMAT
Parametersp-value
meanS.DmeanS. D
ipsilateral side
Dmean (%), n=20*16.410.721.919.9>0.05
D0.1cm3 (%), n=20*27.415.639.923.3>0.05
D1cm3 (%), n=18**19.411.227.217.6>0.05
D2cm3 (%), n=17**16.19.420.814.7>0.05
D10 (%), n=20*22.613.933.223.0>0.05
D30 (%), n=20*18.311.725.821.9>0.05
D50 (%), n=20*15.710.421.020.9>0.05
V10 (%), n=20*61.338.663.933.6>0.05
V30 (%), n=20*14.528.030.138.7>0.05
V50 (%), n=20*1.43.714.127.4>0.05
contralateral side
Dmean (%), n=34***8.24.816.910.8<0.05
D0.1cm3 (%), n=34***13.45.329.712.0<0.05
D1cm3 (%), n=32****9.43.221.78.6<0.05
D2cm3 (%), n=32***8.12.918.38.3<0.05
D10 (%), n=34***11.15.625.312.2<0.05
D30 (%), n=34***9.25.120.411.4<0.05
D50 (%), n=34***8.04.716.711.4<0.05
V10 (%), n=34***26.030.269.927.5<0.05
V30 (%), n=34***1.27.014.125.1<0.05
V50 (%), n=34***0.00.02.712.1N.A

Abbreviations: S.D., standard deviation; IGBT, image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; n, number of the patients for analysis; Dmean, mean relative dose of the PD delivered to the organs; DXcm3, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to most exposed X cm3 of the organs; DX, minimum relative dose of the PD delivered to X% of the organs; VX, relative volume of the organs receiving at least X% of the PD, N.A., not available.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

** two and three patients, respectively, were additionally excluded from the analysis of D1cm3 and D2cm3 because the volume was too small.

** two and three patients, respectively, were additionally excluded from the analysis of D1cm3 and D2cm3 because the volume was too small.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

* in fifteen patients the submandibular glands were resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

**** two and two patients, respectively, were additionally excluded from the analysis of D1cm3 and D2cm3 because the volume was too small.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

*** in one patient the submandibular gland was resected by operation and three patients were not evaluated because of central implantation.

Figure 1

Representative dose distribution of (A) image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IGBT) and (B) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0042 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 461 - 467
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 6, 2018
Published on: Nov 12, 2018
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Hironori Akiyama, Csilla Pesznyák, Dalma Béla, Örs Ferenczi, Tibor Major, Csaba Polgár, Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.