Have a personal or library account? Click to login
MRI and 11C acetate PET/CT for prediction of regional lymph node metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer Cover

MRI and 11C acetate PET/CT for prediction of regional lymph node metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT variables dichotomized with ROC curve and analyzed with multiple logistic regression

Model

Model one through ten: presented with OR (95%CI), p-value.

M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10
3.74.18.42.7
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s(1.1–13.3),(1.1–14.7),(1.8–39.0),(0.8–9.5),
0.0400.0320.0070.110
5.62.74.72.3
LN-SUVmax(1.5–20.6),(0.6-11.1),(1.1-20.5),(0.5-10.7),
0.0100.1790.0400.30
5.73.76.22.8
LN-shape(1.5–21.2),(0.9–15.0),(1.4–27.2),(0.5–14.7),
0.0100.0690.0160.226
6.85.33.94.5
MRI T-stage T3b

T3a is not presented in the table, this is because it is not significant in any of the ten models above.

/ ≤ T2
(1.1–41.6),(1.0–28.6),(0.7–22.0),(0.8–25.2),
0.0390.0510.1260.083
7.54.83.89.3
LN-size mm(1.4–40.3),(0.7-34.7),(0.4-31.6),(1.4-61.1),
0.0180.116)0.2240.020

Nagelkerke’s R2

Psedo R2
0.270.300.390.260.240.290.220.330.230.34
AUC0.750.760.810.730.710.750.680.790.710.75
Sensitivity72746783636568747474
Specificity68687765667265836873
PPV52568040607552855670
NPV83826293686279718276
Cramers’V

Multicollinearity

0.090.150.160.250.540.280.660.370.720.34
Accuracy69707169646866787073

Investigational findings at MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT

MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT findings
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s, mean (SD) range917 (191) 582–1398
LN-SUVmax, mean (SD) range1.8 (1.2) 0.7–5.9
LN size mm, mean (SD) range6.6 (3.7) 3.8–28.3
Proportion of LNs with round shape, n19
Proportion of LNs with oval shape, n34
MRI T-stage, n
< T325
T3a14
T3b14
LN ADC Roi size mm2, median (range)42 (16–334)
Tumor ADC Roi size mm2≥ 80

MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT variables dichotomized using ROC curve and analyzed with simple logistic regression

N0 nN1 nOR95%CIp-valueThresholdAUCPseudo R2

Nagelkerke’s R2

Sensitivity/Specificity/PPV/NPV
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s21193.61.1-11.60.031 ≤ 8000.650.1258/73/76/53
LN-SUVmax28255.41.6-18.70.008≥ 1.60.680.1872/68/52/83
LN-size mm28258.71.7–44.90.010≥ 7.90.660.2083/63/40/93
LN round shape5145.91.7-20.40.0060.690.2074/68/56/82
LN oval shape2311refrefrefrefrefrefref
MRI-T-stage
≤ T2187refrefrefrefrefrefref
T3a772.000.4-10.50.412
T3b3116.01.2-29.40.0270.690.1765/67/65/67

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics
Patients, n53
Age, median (range)68 (55–76)
LN positive patients, n26
PSA level ng/ml, mean (median, range)24 (19, 3–112)
Biopsy Gleason score, n (%)
65 (9.4)
739 (73.6)
85 (9.4)
94 (7.5)
D’Amico risk classification, n (%)
Intermediate6 (11.3)
High47 (88.7)
Clincal T-stage, n (%)
T1c1 (1.9)
T211 (20.8)
T341 (77.4)
Risk of LN invasion

Calculated according to Briganti nomogram (26)

, n
19–59%27
≥ 60%26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 97
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2017
|
Accepted on: Nov 15, 2017
|
Published on: Jan 24, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Catrin von Below, Cecilia Wassberg, Rafael Grzegorek, Joel Kullberg, Charlotta Gestblom, Jens Sörensen, Mauritz Waldén, Håkan Ahlström, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.