Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer – dilemmas and solutions Cover

Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer – dilemmas and solutions

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 47 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Feb 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Chabner BA, Bertino J, Cleary J, Ortiz T, Lane A, Supko JG, et al. Chapter 61. Cytotoxic agents. In: Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollmann BC, editors.. 12th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011. Available from: http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=16680251. Accessed April 16, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Sørensen M, Pijls-Johannesma M, Felip E. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.2010;v120-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Kuo YH, Lin ZZ, Yang YY, Shao YY, Shau WY, Kuo RN, et al. Survival of patients with small cell lung carcinoma in Taiwan.2012;19-24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Kagohashi K, Ohara G, Satoh H, Sekizawa K. Chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer with paraneoplastic nephritic syndrome.2004;153-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Dolenšek M, Bavčar Vodovnik T. [Imaging detetection in early lung cancer]. [Slovenian].2006;S53-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Panov SZ. Molecular biology of the lung cancer.2005;197-210.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Terčelj M. [Early detetection of lung cancer]. [Slovenian].2006;S59-66.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis.1992;890-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer.2002;85-91.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/ cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer.2006;2038-43.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Califano R, Abidin AZ, Peck R, Faivre-Finn C, Lorigan P. Management of small cell lung cancer. Recent Developments for Optimal Care.2012;471-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, Boiocchi M. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.2004;441-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Montecucco A, Biamonti G. Cellular response to etoposide treatment.2007;9-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Hande KR. The importance of drug scheduling in cancer chemotherapy: etoposide as an example.1996;234-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Greco FA, Johnson DH, Hande KR, Porter LL, Hainsworth JD, Wolff SN. High-dose etoposide (VP-16) in small-cell lung cancer.1985;42-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Slevin ML, Clark PI, Joel SP, Malik S, Osborne RJ, Gregory WM, et al. A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.1989;1333-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Miller AA, Herndon JE II, Hollis DR, Ellerton J, Langleben A, Richards F II, et al. Schedule dependency of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in combination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase III study of the cancer and leukemia group B.1995;1871-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Seiter K. Toxicity of the topoisomerase II inhibitors.2005;219-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. 19 Clark PI. Current role of oral etoposide in the management of small cell lung cancer.1999:17-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Prolonged administration of low-daily dose etoposide: a superior dosing schedule?1994;101-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Sørensen M, Felip E. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.2009;iv71-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.1997;110-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Payne SA. A study of quality of life in cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.1992;1505-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Johnson DH, Ruckdeschel JC, Keller JH, Lyman GH, Kallas GJ, Macdonald J, et al. A randomized trial to compare intravenous and oral etoposide in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.1991;245-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Pashko S, Johnson DH. Potential cost savings of oral versus intravenous etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.1992;293-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Fujiwara Y, Ohune T, Okusaki K, Niitani K, Sumiyoski H, Takemoto V, et al. Bioavailability of 50- and 75-mg oral etoposide in lung cancer patients.1996;327-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Joel SP, Clark PI, Heap L, Webster L, Robbins S, Craft H, et al. Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide.1995;125-33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Barnett MJ, Smythe MM, Ang LM, et al. The pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide (VP16-213).1984; 3: 24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH. Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide.1993;374-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Hande K, Messenger M, Wagner J, Krozely M, Kaul S. Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration.1999;2742-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Würthwein G, Krümpelmann S, Tillmann B, Real E, Schulze-Westhoff P, Jürgens H, et al. Population pharmacokinetic approach to compare oral and i.v. administration of etoposide.1999;807-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Slevin ML, Joel SP, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey VJ, Osborne RJ, et al. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation.1989;329-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Desoize B, Maréchal F, Cattan A. Correlations between clinical pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and etoposide.1993;125-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. You B, Tranchand B, Girard P, Falandry C, Ribba B, Chabaud S, et al. Etoposide pharmacokinetics and survival in patients with small cell lung cancer: A multicentre study.2008;261-72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Roden DM. Chapter 5. Principles of Clinical Pharmacology. In: Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors.18th edition. New York: McGraw- Hill; 2012. Available form: http://www.accessmedicine.com/content.aspx?aID=9092427. Accessed April 16, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Franke RM, Gardner ER, Sparreboom A. Pharmacogenetics of drug transporters.2010;220-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Brinkmann U, Roots I, Eichelbaum M. Pharmacogenetics of the human drug-transporter gene MDR1: impact of polymorphisms on pharmacotherapy.2001;835-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Dietrich CG, Geier A, Oude Elferink RPJ. ABC of oral bioavailability: transporters as gatekeepers in the gut.2003;1788-95.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Kunta J, Yan J, Makhey VD, Sinko PJ. Active efflux kinetics of etoposide from rabbit small intestine and colon.2000;83-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Allen JD, van Dort SC, Buitelaar M, van Tellingen O, Schinkel AH. Mouse breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp1/Abcg2) mediates etoposide resistance and transport, but etoposide oral availability is limited primarily by P-glycoprotein.2003;1339-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Guo A, Marinaro W, Hu P, Sinko PJ. Delineating the contribution of secretory transporters in the efflux of etoposide using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells overexpressing P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistanceassociated protein (MRP1), and canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter (cMOAT).2002;457-63.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Cui Y, Konig J, Buchholz JK, Spring H, Leier I, Keppler D. Drug resistance and ATP-dependent conjugate transport mediated by the apikal multidrug resistance protein, MRP2, permanently expressed in human and canine cells.1999;929-37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Kool M, van der Linden M, de Haas M, Scheffer GL, de Vree JM, Smith AJ, et al. MRP3, an organic anion transporter able to transport anti-cancer drugs.1999;6914-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Wijnholds J, Scheffer GL, van der Valk M, van der Valk P, Beijnen JH, Scheper RJ, et al. Multidrug resistance protein 1 protects the oropharyngeal mucosal layer and the testicular tubules against drug-induced damage.1998;797-808.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Stephens RH, O’Neill CA, Bennett J, Humphrey M, Henry B, Rowland M. Resolution of P-glycoprotein effects on drug permeability using intestinal tissues from mdr1a (-/-) mice.2002;2038-46.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Lagas JS, Fan L, Wagenaar E, Vlaming MLH, van Tellingen O, Beijnen JH, et al. P-glycoprotein (P-gp/Abcb1), Abcc2, and Abcc3 determine the pharmacokinetics of etoposide.2010;130-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Relling MV, Nemec J, Schuetz EG, Schuetz JD, Gonzalez FJ, Korzekwa KR. O-demethylation of epipodophyllotoxins is catalyzed by human cytochrome P450 3A4.1994;352-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Zhuo X, Zheng N, Felix CA, Blair IA. Kinetics and regulation of cytochrome P450-mediated etoposide metabolism.2004;993-1000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Kawashiro T, Yamashita K, Zhao X-J, Koyama E, Tani M, Chiba K, et al. A study on the metabolism of etoposide and possible interactions with antitumor or supporting agents by human liver microsomes.1998;1294-300.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Mans DRA, Retèl J, van Maanen JMS, Lafleur MVM, van Schaik MA, Pinedo HM, et al. Role of the semi-quinone free radical of the anti-tumor agent etoposide (VP-16-213) in the inactivation of single- and double-stranded ΦX174 DNA.1990;54-60.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. 51. van Maanen JMS, de Vries J, Pappie D, van den Akker E, Lafleur MVM, Retèl J, et al. Cytochrome P-450-mediated O-demethylation: A route in the metabolic activation of etoposide (VP-16-213).1987;4658-62.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Haim N, Nemec J, Roman J, Sinha BK. In vitro metabolism of etoposide (VP-16-213) by liver microsomes and irreversible binding of reactive intermediates to microsomal proteins.1987;527-36.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. 53. Mans DR, Lafleur MV, Westmijze EJ, Horn IR, Bets D, Schuurhuis GJ, et al. Reactions of glutathione with the catehol, the ortho-quinone and the semi-quinone free radical of etoposide. Consequences for DNA inactivation.1992;1761-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Wen Z, Tallman MN, Ali SY, Smith PC. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Is the principal enzyme responsible for etoposide glucuronidation in human liver and intestinal microsomes: Structural characterization of phenolic and alcoholic glucuronides of etoposide and estimation of enzyme kinetics.2007;371-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Watanabe Y, Nakajima M, Ohashi N, Kume T, Yokoi T. Glucuronidation of etoposide in human liver microsomes is specifically catalyzed by UDPglucuronosyltransferase 1A1.2003;589-95.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Del Amo EM, Heikkinen AT, Mönkkönen J. In vitro-in vivo correlation in p-glycoprotein mediated transport in intestinal absorption.2009;200-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Matheny CJ, Lamb MW, Brouwer KR, Pollack GM. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic implications of P-glycoprotein modulation.2001;778-96.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. 58. Kerb R. Implications of genetic polymorphisms in drug transporters for pharmacotherapy.2006;4-33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. 59. Robert J, Le Morvan V, Smith D, Pourquier P, Bonnet J. Predicting drug response and toxicity based on gene polymorphisms.2005;171-96.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. 60. Strother RM, Jones D, Li L, Younger A, Einhorn LH, Williams S, et al. Effect of the C3435T genetic polymorphism in MDR1 on etoposide pharmacokinetics.2008;(May 20 suppl; abstr 2500).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. 61. Hoffmeyer S, Burk O, von Richter O, Arnold H, Brockmoller J, Johne A, et al. Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo.2000;3473-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. 62. Nakamura T, Sakaeda T, Horinouchi M, Tamura T, Aoyama N, Shirakawa T, et al. Effect of the mutation (C3435T) at exon 26 on the MDR1 gene on expression level of MDR1 messenger ribonucleic acid in duodenal enterocytes of healthy Japanese subjects.2002;297-303.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. 63. Gerritsen-van Schieveen P, Royer B. Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring for etoposide after oral administration.2011;277-82.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. 64. Aita P, Robieux I, Sorio R, Tumolo S, Corona G, Cannizzaro R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.1999;287-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. 65. Taal BG, Beijnen JH, Teller FG, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Dubbelman R, Boot H. Bioavailability of oral etoposide in gastric cancer.1994;420-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  66. 66. Ando M, Minami H, Ando Y, Sakai S, Shimono Y, Sugiura S, et al. Pharmacological analysis of etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer.1999;1690-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. 67. Fijiwara Y, Ohune T, Niitani K, Okusaki K, Sumiyoshi H, Ohashi N. Clinical pharmacological profile of etoposide in the elderly.1996;174
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. 68. Miyazaki M, Fujiwara Y, Oguri T, Takahashi T, Ohune T, Sumiyoshi H, et al. Clinical pharmacological profile of etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer.2005;92-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. 69. Blower P, de Wit R, Goodin S, Aapro M. Drug-drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized?2005;117-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. 70. Thomas HD, Porter DJ, Bartelink I, Nobbs JR, Cole M, Elliott S, et al. Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.2002,83-91.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  71. 71. Bisogno G, Cowie F, Boddy A, Thomas HD, Dick G, Pinkerton CR. High-dose cyclosporin with etoposide - toxicity and pharmacokinetic interaction in children with solid tumors.1998;2304-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  72. 72. Kan WM, Liu YT, Hsiao CL, Shieh CY, Kuo JH, Huang JD, et al. Effect of hydroxizide on the transport of etoposide in rat small intestine.2011;267-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  73. 73. Leu BL, Huang JD. Inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein and effects on etoposide absorption.1995;432-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. 74. Zhang J, Zhou F, Wu X, Gu Y, Ai H, Zheng Y, et al. 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rh2 noncompetitively inhibits P-glycoprotein in vitro and in vivo: A case for herb-drug interactions.2010;2179-87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  75. 75. Li C, Li X, Choi JS. Enhanced bioavailability of etoposide after oral or intravenous administration of etoposide with kaempferol in rats.2009;133-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  76. 76. Li X, Yun JK, Choi JS. Effects of morin on the pharmacokinetics of etoposide in rats.2007;151-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  77. 77. Li X, Choi JS. Effects of quercetin on the pharmacokinetics of Etoposide after oral or intravenous administration of etoposide in rats.2009;1411-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. 78. Piao YJ, Li X, Choi JS. Effects of verapamil on etoposide pharmacokinetics after intravenous and oral administration in rats.2008;159-64.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  79. 79. Keller RP, Altermatt, HJ, Donatsch P, Zihlmann H, Laissue JA, Hiestand PC. Pharmacologic interactions between the resistance-modifying cyclosporine SDZ PSC 833 and etoposide (VP 16-213) enhancecytostatic activity and toxicity.1992;433-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  80. 80. Peng Yong W, Desai AA, Innocenti F, Ramirez J, Shepard D, Kobayashi K, et al. Pharmacokinetic modulation of oral etoposide by ketoconazole in patients with advanced cancer.2007;811-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  81. 81. Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Johnston A, Wrigley PFM. The effect of food and concurent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposide.1985;363-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  82. 82. Reif S, Nicolson MC, Bisset D, Reid M, Kloft C, Jaehde U, et al. Effects of grapefruit juice intake on etoposide bioavailability.2002;491-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  83. 83. Najar IA, Sharma SC, Singh GD, Koul S, Gupta PN, Javed S, et al. Involvment of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 in the enhancement of etoposide bioavailability by a piperine analogue.2011;84-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  84. 84. Lee CK, Ki SH, Choi JS. Effects of oral curcumin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral etoposide in rats: possible role of intestinal CYP3A and P-gp inhibition by curcumin.2011;245-51.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  85. 85. Rodman JH, Murry DJ, Madden T, Santana VM. Altered etoposide pharmacokinetics and time to engraftment in pediatric patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.1994;2390-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  86. 86. Shah JC, Chen JR, Chow D. Preformulation study of etoposide: Identification of physicochemical characteristics responsible for the low and erratic oral bioavailability of etoposide.1989;408-12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  87. 87. Slevin ML. The clinical pharmacology of etoposide.1991;319-29.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  88. 88. Joel SP, Clark PI, Slevin ML. Stability of the i.v. and oral formulations of etoposide in solution.1995;117-24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  89. 89. Arai R, Kodema N, Tsuruta M, Furuse K, Nishiwaki Y, Nemoto E, et al. A cooperative phase II study of NK 171 (etoposide) in small cell lung cancer - comparison of results between the intravenous administration and the oral administration.1986;110
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  90. 90. Furuse K. [A Phase II study of etoposide (NK171) in small cell lung cancer - comparison of results between intravenous administration and oral administration]. [Japanese].1985;2352-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. 91. Ohno S, Sugama Y, Sugiyama Y, Kitamura S. Comparison of chronic oral and intravenous etoposide administration in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of small cell lung cancer. [Abstract].1991;118
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  92. 92. Miller AA, Herndon JE 2nd, Hollis DR, Ellerton J, Langleben A, Richards F 2nd, et al. Schedule dependency of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in combination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase III study of the cancer and leukemia group B.1995;1871-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  93. 93. Girling DJ. Comparison of oral etoposide and standard intravenous multidrug chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a stopped multicentre randomised trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.1996;563-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. 94. Souhami RL, Spiro SG, Rudd RM, Ruiz de Elvira MC, James LE, Gower NH, et al. Five-day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison with intravenous chemotherapy.1997,577-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  95. 95. Sparreboom A, de Jonge MJA, Verweij J. The use of oral cytotoxic and cytostatic drugs in cancer treatment.2002;18-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  96. 96. Zhang T, Chen J, Zhang Y, Shen Q, Pan W. Characterization and evaluation of nanostructured lipid carrier as a vehicle for oral delivery of etoposide.2011;174-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  97. 97. Wu Z, Guo D, Deng L, Zhang Y, Yang Q, Chen J. Preparation and evaluation of a self-emulsifying drug delivery sistem of etoposide-phospholipid complex.2011;103-12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  98. 98. Zhang F, Koh GY, Hollingsworth J, Russo PS, Stout RW, Liu Z. Reformulation of etoposide with solubility-enhancing rubusoside.2012;453-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  99. 99. Mo R, Xiao Y, Sun M, Zhang C, Ping Q. Enhancing effect of N-octyl-O-sulfate chitosan on etoposide absorption.2011;38-45.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  100. 100. Chabot GG, Armand JP, Terret C, de Forni M, Abigerges D, Winograd B, et al. Etoposide bioavailability after oral administration of the prodrug etoposide phosphate in cancer patients during a phase I study.1996;2020-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  101. 101. 96 Sessa C, Zucchetti M, Cerny T, Pagani O, Cavalli F, De Fusco M, et al. Phase I clinical and harmacokinetic study of oral etoposide phosphate.1995;200-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  102. 102. de Jong RS, Mulder NH, Uges DRA, Kaul S, Winograd B, Sleijfer DTh, et al. Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.1997;: 1660-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  103. 103. Mathijssen RHN, de Jong FA, Loos WJ, van der Bol JM, Verweij J, Sparreboom A. Flat-fixed dosing versus body surface area-based dosing of anticancer drugs in adults: does it make a difference?2007;913-23.
    Search in Google Scholar
  104. 104. Lowis SP, Price L, Pearson ADJ, Newell DR, Cole M. A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children.1998;2318-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  105. 105. El-Yazigi A, Ezzat A, Berry J, Raines DA, Yusuf A, Al-Rawithi S, et al. Optimization of oral etoposide dosage in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using the fraction of dose absorbed measured for each patient.2000;153-60.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  106. 106. Holz JB, Köppler H, Schmidt L, Fritsch HW, Pflüger KH, Jungclas H. Limited sampling models for reliable estimation of etoposide area under the curve.1995;1794-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  107. 107. Gentili D, Zucchetti M, Torri V, Sessa C, de Jong J, Cavalli F, et al. A limited sampling model for the pharmacokinetics of etoposide given orally.1993;482-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  108. 108. Millward MJ, Newell DR, Yuen K, Matthews JP, Balmanno K, Charlton CJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer.1995;161-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  109. 109. Minami H, Ando Y, Sakai S, Shimokata K. Clinical and pharmacologic analysis of hyperfractionated daily oral etoposide.1995;191-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  110. 110. Tranchand B, Amsellem C, Chatelut E, Freyer G, Iliadis A, Ligneau B, et al. A limited-sampling strategy for estimation of etoposide pharmacokinetics in cancer patients.1999;316-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  111. 111. Palle J, Frost BM, Gustafsson G, Hellebostad M, Kanerva J, Liliemark E. Etoposide pharmacokinetics in children treated for acute myeloid leukaemia.2006;1087-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  112. 112. Lowis SP, Pearson ADJ, Newell DR, Cole M. Etoposide pharmacokinetics: the development and prospective validation of a dosing equation.1993;4881-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  113. 113. Ando Y, Minami H, Saka H, Ando M, Sakai S, Shimokata K. Therapeutic drug monitoring in 21-day oral etoposide treatment for lung cancer.1996;856-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  114. 114. Lowis SP, Price L, Pearson ADJ, Newell DR, Cole M. A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children.1998;2318-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  115. 115. Aarons L. Population pharmacokinetics: theory and practice.1991;669-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  116. 116. Nguyen I, Chatelut E, Chevreau C, Tranchand B, Lochon I, Bachaud JM, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound etoposide.1998;125-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  117. 117. Toffoli G, Corona G, Sorio R, Robieux I, Basso B, Colussi AM, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.2001;511-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  118. 118. Ciccolini J, Monjanel-Mouterde S, Bun SS, Blanc C, Duffaud F, Favre R, et al. Population pharmacokientics of etoposide: application to therapeutic drug monitoring.2002;709-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  119. 119. Nebert DW. Polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes: what is their clinical relevance and why do they exist?1997;265-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  120. 120. Miller AA, Tolley EA, Niell HB, Griffin JP, Mauer AM. Pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.1993;1179-88.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  121. 121. Miller AA, Tolley EA, Niell HB. Therapeutic drug monitoring of 21-day oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.1998;1705-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Published on: Feb 1, 2013
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
oral etoposide,
bioavailability,
pharmacokinetic variability,
small cell lung cancer
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Radiology

© 2013 Renata Rezonja, Lea Knez, Tanja Cufer, Aleš Mrhar, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 47 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
Next article