Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Regional Perspectives on Chemical Weapons: A Middle East and the EU Comparison Cover

Regional Perspectives on Chemical Weapons: A Middle East and the EU Comparison

By: Zoltán Őze  
Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Adachi, K. (2012). Grasping the transformation of a norm: From poison ban norm to chemical weapon ban norm. Journal of International Relations, 18(2). Available at: https://globalgovernance.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GlobalGovernance_2nd_englishsummary.pdf.
  2. Altman, D., Rojas-de-Galarreta, F., & Urdinez, F. (2021). An interactive model of democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research, 58(3), 489-504. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022343319883672.
  3. Blair, C.W., Chu, J.A., & Schwartz, J.A. (2022). The Two Faces of Opposition to Chemical Weapons: Sincere Versus Insincere Norm-Holders. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), 66(4-5), 677-703. DOI: 10.1177/00220027211057057.
  4. Britannica. (2025). Iran-Iraq War. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/event/Iran-Iraq-War.
  5. Chapman, G., Elbahtimy, H., & Martin, S.B. (2018). The Future of Chemical Weapons: Implications from the Syrian Civil War. Security Studies, 27(4), 704-737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2018.1483640.
  6. Chemical Weapons Convention Coalition/CWCC. (2025). Statements, recommendations & reports. Available at: https://www.cwccoalition.org/statements-recommendations-reports/
  7. CNBC. (2018). Russian diplomats expelled: The list of countries punishing Moscow grows. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/27/russian-diplomats-expelled-the-list-of-countries-punishing-moscow-grows.html.
  8. Collins, L. (2019). A modern-day nerve agent attack: Military lessons from Salisbury. Modern War Institute, New York: West Point. Available at: https://mwi.westpoint.edu/modern-day-nerve-agent-attack-military-lessons-salisbury/.
  9. Council of the European Union. (2018, October 15). Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 of 15 October 2018 concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons. Official Journal of the European Union, L 262/1. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2018/1544/oj.
  10. Ekzayez, A., et al. (2019). Chemical weapons and public health: Assessing impact of chemical weapons use on public health in conflict areas. Journal of Public Health, 42(3), e334-e342. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz145.
  11. European Commission. (2025). Exporting dual-use items. Trade and Economic Security Policy. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/help-exporters-and-importers/exporting-dual-use-items_en.
  12. Ghionis, A. (2023). The OPCW and Civil Society: Considerations on Relevant Themes and Issues. CBWNet. Available at: https://cbwnet.org/media/pages/publications/working-paper/the-opcw-and-civil-society-considerations-on-relevant-themes-and-issues/f047a99e86-1702984096/wp-10-website-version.pdf.
  13. Haviland, S. (2021). A Reflection on Accountability for Chemical Weapon Use in Syria. InterAction. Available at: https://www.interaction.org/blog/a-reflection-on-accountability-for-chemical-weapon-use-in-syria/.
  14. Human Rights Watch. (1993). Genocide in Iraq: The Anfal Campaign against the Kurds. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/ANFALINT.htm.
  15. Human Rights Watch. (2017). Death by chemicals: The Syrian governments widespread and systematic use of chemical weapons. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/05/01/death-chemicals/syrian-governments-widespread-and-systematic-use-chemical-weapons.
  16. Jaber, B. (2020). Working Methods of the United Nations Security Council: Failures in Syria. Queen’s University Faculty of Law, Global Justice Journal. Available at: https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/working-methods-of-the-united-nations-security-council-failures-in-syria.
  17. Kamrava, M. (2016). Weak States in the Middle East (Chapter I). In Fragile Politics: Weak States in the Greater Middle East. Oxford Academic, 1-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190246211.003.0001.
  18. Kelle, A. (1997). The OPCW Verification Regime. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Available at: https://media.nti.org/pdfs/Kelle_OPCW_Verification_Regime.pdf.
  19. Larsson, S. (2005). Weak states? A pursuit for a weak state definition and feasible reconstruction theories. Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=download File&recordOId=1332751&fileOId=1332752.
  20. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682-693. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513.
  21. Médecins Sans Frontières. (2013, August). Thousands suffering neurotoxic symptoms treated in hospitals supported by MSF. Available at: https://www.msf.org/syria-thousands-suffering-neurotoxic-symptoms-treated-hospitals-supported-msf.
  22. Nuclear Threat Initiative/NTI. (2015). Libya chemical weapons overview. Available at: https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/libya-chemical/, accessed on November 12, 2025.
  23. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2020, October 6). S/1906/2020 ‒ Note by the Technical Secretariat. Summary of the Report on Activities Carried out in Support of a Request for Technical Assistance by Germany (Technical Assistance Visit – TAV/01/20). Available at: https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/s-1906-2020%28e%29.pdf.
  24. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2023, January 27). S/2125/2023 ‒ Note by the Technical Secretariat. Third Report by the OPCW Investigation and Identification Team Pursuant to Paragraph 10 of Decision C-SS-4/Dec.3 “Addressing the Threat from Chemical Weapons Use” Douma (Syrian Arab Republic) – 7 April 2018. Available at: https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2023/01/s-2125-2023%28e%29.pdf.
  25. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2023, December 21). European Union contributes €5.35M to strengthen OPCW activities. Available at: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2023/12/european-union-contributes-eu535m-strengthen-opcw-activities.
  26. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2024, February 22). Investigation and Identification Team - Fourth report: Investigation into the chemical weapons attack in Marea on 1 September 2015 (IIT Fourth Report). Available at: https://www.opcw.org/iit.
  27. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2025, December 22). European Union Contributes EUR 4.45 million to support OPCW missions. Available at: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2025/12/european-union-contributes-eur-445-million-support-opcw-missions
  28. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2025, February 14). S/2370/2025 ‒ Note by the Technical Secretariat. Report of the OPCW Technical Assistance Visit on the Activities Carried out in Support of a Request by Ukraine (Technical Assistance Visit TAV/05/24 and TAV/01/25). Available at: https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2025/02/s-2370-2025(e).pdf.
  29. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.OPCW. (2025a, February 14). OPCW Issues Report on Second Technical Assistance Visit to Ukraine Following Three Incidents of Alleged Use of Toxic Chemicals as a Weapon. Available at: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2025/02/opcw-issues-report-second-technical-assistance-visit-ukraine-following.
  30. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons/OPCW. (2025b, June 26). OPCW Issues Report on Third Technical Assistance Visit to Ukraine Following an Incident of Alleged Use of Toxic Chemicals as a Weapon. Available at: https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2025/06/opcw-issues-report-third-technical-assistance-visit-ukraine-following.
  31. Palkki, D.D., & Rubin, L. (2021). Saddam Hussein’s role in the gassing of Halabja. The Nonproliferation Review, 28(1-3), 115-129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2020.1795600.
  32. Price, R. (2019). Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 37-52. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jogss/article-abstract/4/1/37/5347905.
  33. Razavi, S.M., Razavi, M.S., Pirhosseinloo, M., & Salamati, P. (2014). Iraq-Iran chemical war: calendar, mortality and morbidity. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 17(3), 165-169. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24889980/.
  34. Rodriguez-Llanes, J.M., Guha-Sapir, D., Schlüter, B.S., & Hicks, M.H. (2018). Epidemiological findings of major chemical attacks in the Syrian war are consistent with civilian targeting: a short report. Conflict and Health, 12(16). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-018-0150-4.
  35. Risse, T. (2025). Democracy and State Support for Arms Control. Foreign Policy Analysis, 21(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf026.
  36. Russett, B. (1995). The Democratic Peace. International Security, 19(4), 164-175. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539124.
  37. Sandhu, E. (2014). Completing the norm life cycle: the post-treaty involvement of NGOs in the Mine Ban Treaty and Chemical Weapons Convention (Master’s thesis). University of British Columbia. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/50244.
  38. Security Council Report. (2025, March 5). Syria (Chemical Weapons): Briefing and Consultations. What’s in Blue. Available at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2025/03/syria-chemical-weapons-briefing-and-consultations-3.php.
  39. Shenon, P. (2002, December 21). Declaration Lists Companies that Sold Chemicals to Iraq. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/21/world/threats-responses-suppliers-declaration-lists-companies-that-sold-chemicals-iraq.html.
  40. Tehran Peace Museum. (n.d.). An open wound: Consequences of the use of chemical weapons against Iran [PDF]. Available at: https://www.tehranpeacemuseum.org/files/pdf%20resources/English%20Text-%20chemical%20warfare.pdf.
  41. UK Government. (2018, March 17). Novichok nerve agent use in Salisbury: UK government response. Gov.UK Press Release. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/novichok-nerve-agent-use-in-salisbury-uk-government-response.
  42. United Nations. General Assembly Security Council. (2013, September 16). Report of the United Nations Mission to Investigate Allegations of the Use of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic on the alleged use of chemical weapons in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013 (Document A/67/997S/2013/553). Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/A/67/997.
  43. United Nations Security Council. (2004, April 28). Resolution 1540 (2004) [on non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons]. United Nations. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/520326.
  44. United Nations Security Council. (2017). S/2017/904 - Seventh report of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism. Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/S/2017/904.
  45. Zanders, J.P. (2019). Preventing the re-emergence of chemical weapons. Brussels: European Union Institute for Security Studies/EU ISS. Available at: https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/preventing-re-emergence-chemical-weapons.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 3100-5071 | Journal ISSN: 3100-5063
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 105
Submitted on: Nov 14, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Zoltán Őze, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.