References
- Allied Command Transformation. (2023). Strategic Foresight Analysis. NATO, 85-86. Available at: https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SFA2023_rev2.pdf.
- Center for Strategic and International Studies/CSIS. (2023). Lessons from the Ukraine Conflict: Modern Warfare in the Age of Autonomy, Information, and Resilience. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/lessons-ukraine-conflict-modern-warfare-age-autonomy-information-and-resilience.
- Chirilă, D.-E. (2025). Pragmatismul decizional în contextul agresiunii de tip hibrid. Buletinul Universității Naționale de Apărare „Carol I”, 14(2), 69-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53477/2065-8281-25-13.
- Christensen, J.G., & Renic, N. (2024). Drones, the Russo-Ukrainian War and the Future of Armed Conflict. Djøf Publishing In cooperation with the Centre for Military Studies, 65-66, 85-86. Available at: https://pure.au.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/437235031/Drones_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War_And_the_Future_of_Armed_Conflict.pdf.
- Department of the Army. (2014). FM 4-01: Army transportation operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1-7–1-12.
- Department of the Army. (2019). ADP 4-0: Sustainment. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 3-1–3-17.
- Department of the Army. (2024). FM 4-0: Sustainment operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 122-154.
- Friedrich, H., & Gumpp, J. (2014). Simplified modeling and solving of logistics optimization problems. International Journal of Transportation, 2(1), 33-52. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2014.2.1.03.
- Genini, D. (2025). Countering hybrid threats: How NATO must adapt (again) after the war in Ukraine. New Perspectives, 33(18). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389342973_Countering_hybrid_threats_How_NATO_must_adapt_again_after_the_war_in_Ukraine.
- Hamilton, C. (2025). The Logistics of Victory: Ukraine’s Sustainment Challenge. Real Clear Defense. Available at: https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2025/03/17/the_logistics_of_victory_ukraines_sustainment_challenge_1097974.html.
- Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars, 12-34. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. Available at: https://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf.
- Hoffman, F.G. (2009). Hybrid warfare and challenges. Joint Force Quarterly, 52(1), 34-39. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA516871.pdf.
- Kress, M. (2016). Operational logistics: The art and science of sustaining military operations (2nd ed.). 27-136. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
- Lopez T. (2024). DOD Needs Solutions for the Proliferation of Autonomous Vehicles, Defense Official Says. Defense Logistics Agency. Available at: https://www.dla.mil/About-DLA/News/News-Article-View/Article/3869110/dod-needs-solutions-for-the-proliferation-of-autonomous-vehicles-defense-offici/.
- Mehrjerdi, Y.Z., & Lotfi, R. (2019). Development of a mathematical model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain with efficiency and resilience systematic framework. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 6(4), 360-388. DOI: 10.22034/2019.4.6.
- Mészáros, E.L., & Țoca, C.V. (2023). The EU’s resilience and the management of hybrid threats coming from the Eastern neighbourhood: Belarus and the deliberate facilitation of irregular immigration. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 14(1), 5-7. DOI: 10.47743/ejes-2023-0101.
- Minculete, G. (2025). Essential Determinants in the Transformation of Military Operational Logistics Management. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 31(1), 144-152. DOI: 10.2478/kbo-2025-0017.
- Mohammed, S.S., Schaefer, D., & Milisavljevic-Syed, J. (2023). Towards pre-emptive resilience in military supply chains: A compromise decision support model-based approach. Production & Manufacturing Research, 11(1), 1-24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2023.2220768.
- NATO Standardization Office. (2022). AJP-3.2: Allied joint doctrine for land operations. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 20-22.
- NATO Standardization Office. (2024). APP-28. Tactical planning for land forces. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 2-23–2-24.
- NATO Standardization Office. (2025). AJP-4: Allied Joint Doctrine for Sustainment of Operations. Edition C Version 1. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 25-27.
- Pawelczyk, M. (2018). Contemporary challenges in military logistics support. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20(3), 85-98. Available at: https://securityanddefence.pl/pdf-103332-36169.
- Romandash, A. (2025). Hybrid Warfare: Ukraine, Russia and Western Lessons. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Policy Brief No. 209 - September 2025, 1-9. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/PB_no.209.pdf.
- Sharma, A. (2023). Managing Complex Supply Chains: Lessons from Military Logistics. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 12(6), 26-38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v12i6.6215.
- Toubman, A., et al. (2025). Simulation-Based Analysis of Logistics and Sustainment for the Armed Forces. STO-MP-MSG-229, 2025, pp. 21-1–12-12. Available at: https://publications.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STO-MPMSG-229/MP-MSG-229-12.pdf.
- Vrysagotis, V., Vidalis, M, & Paris, A. (2017). A quantitative model for the distribution operations in defense logistics. Journal of Computations & Modelling, 7(3), 1-19. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318673171_A_quantitative_model_for_the_distribution_operations_in_defense_logistics.
- Watling. J., & Reynolds, N. (2023). Stormbreak: Fighting Through Russian Defences in Ukraine’s 2023 Offensive. Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. RUSI Special Report, September 2023, 1-25. Available at: https://static.rusi.org/Stormbreak-Special-Report-web-final_0.pdf.