References
- 1. Alia, Valerie. 2004. Media Ethics and Social Change. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474463898
- 2. Anderson, Robert. 2016. “The Rashomon Effect and Communication.” Canadian Journal of Communication 41: 249–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3068
- 3. Barthes, Roland. 1985. Rhetoric of the image. New York: Hill & Wang
- 4. Coy, Peter. 1971. “A Watershed in Mexican Rural History: Some Thoughts on the Reconciliation of Conflicting Interpretations.” Journal of Latin American Studies (Cambridge University Press) 3 (1): 39-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/156099
- 5. Dánél, Mónika. 2017. “Multiple Revolutions. Remediating and Re-enacting the Romanian Events of 1989.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies (De Gruyter) 14 (1): 95–130. doi:10.1515/ausfm-2017-0005
- 6. Davis, Blair , Robert Anderson, and Jan Walls, . 2018. Rashomon Effects. Kurosawa, Rashomon and their legacies. Routledge
- 7. DeGuzman, Kyle. 2022. “What is The Rashomon Effect in Film?” studiobinder.com. 11 September . Accessed 12 01, 2022. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-the-rashomon-effect-definition/
- 8. German, Lavinia. 2018. “The relation between “seeing” and “being seen”: a diachronic perspective on photographic view.” Comunicarea interpersonală. Arta și educația ca mijloace de comunicare. Iași: Ars Longa. 187-193
- 9. German, Lavinia, and Bogdan Teodorescu. 2016. Limbajul artistic al fotografiei. Iași: Artes.
- 10. Gheorghe, Cătălin. 2010. Condiția Critică. Iași: Institutul European
- 11. Gheorghe, Catalin, Lavinia German, Daniel Sofron, Catalin Soreanu, and Mihai Verestiuc, . 2020. Aparte Gallery. Exhibitions. Translated by Sorana Lupu and Cezara Popescu. Iasi: Artes
- 12. Gütschow, Beate. 2021. S Series. 01 01. Accessed 11 26, 2022. https://beateguetschow.de/s-series/
- 13. Heider, Karl G. 1988. “The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree.” American Anthropologist (Blackwell Publishing) 90 (1): 73-81. Accessed 01 04, 2009. https://www.jstor.org/stable/678455
- 14. Huyghe, Pierre, and Philippe Parreno. 2003. No Ghost Just a Shell. 01 01. Accessed 11 26, 2022. http://www.noghostjustashell.com/
- 15. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Massachusets: The MIT Press
- 16. McElhinney, David. 2022. The Rashomon Effect: In a Grove at 100 Years Old. 15 04. Accessed 11 26, 2022. https://www.tokyoweekender.com/2022/04/rashomon-effect/
- 17. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. UK: Routledge
- 18. Orfano, Sheila Marie. 2021. “How do you know what’s true?” TEDed. Accessed 11 26, 2022. https://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-trust-your-memory-sheila-marie-orfano
- 19. Sofron, Daniel. 2015. “The Hierarchical Perspective.” Anastasis. Research in Medieval Culture and Art (Artes) 252-261.
- 20. Soreanu, Catalin. 2018. Artă și publicitate. Medii de expresie în publicitatea contemporană. Iași: Artes
- 21. Soreanu, Catalin. 2016. “The Sacred In Contemporary Advertising.” Edited by Codrina-Laura Ioniță, Puiu Ioniţă and Brînduşa Grigoriu. ANASTASIS - Research in Medieval Culture and Art (Artes) 3 (1): 149-158. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4588182
- 22. Teodorescu, Bogdan. 2012. “Fotoperformance-ul între formă și atitudine.” Arta (6-7): 94-97
- 23. Teodorescu, Bogdan. 2012. “Images of a Revolution.” In Vector - Critical Research in Context. Trial, edited by Gheorghe Cătălin and Acostioaei Dan . Iasi: Artes
- 24. tvtropes.org. 2022. “Rashomon”-Style. Accessed 11 26, 2022. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RashomonStyle
- 25. Verestiuc, Mihai. 2022. “Object and objecthood in post-minimal sculpture.” Review of Artistic Education (Artes) (24): 194 - 203. doi:10.2478 / rae – 2022 – 0024
- 26. Yang, Jialin. 2022. “Class Solidification and “Korean-Style” Dilemma: Analysis of Metaphors in the Film Parasite.” Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences 2(8): 125–130. doi:10.54691/fhss.v2i8.1x669